Why is it that when conservatives accuse Michael Moore of giving false information in his films, they never go out and prove it? For instance, this Fred Thompson, who calls Moore's information 'falsehoods' and says it's well documented information of his falsehoods. I'm sorry, but this is coming from a guy, who is with a party that is FULL of falsehoods?! Check it out.
http://apnews.excite.com/article/2007051...biggotry at it's best!
I think Michael Moore should do a documentary on these alledged falsehoods and expose them for what all of this is really about.
Dude, how can you really call Moore a serous journalist? He makes movies, loosely based on historical facts. He takes full artistic license, and I'm sure he admits it unless he is completely full of crap. What he does is called propaganda, albeit leftist one, but never the less, it is propaganda. People who are smart enough watch his work but take it with a grain of salt. The Internet blogging Liberals on the war pass brigade however, due to their lack of basic intelligence, treats his stuff as gospel. But hey, they do the same for Loose Change, when anybody who has ever took a materials engineering course can show exactly how the buildings collapsed.
Excuse me? And what does bush and all of his goons do? The point is, he brings proof, they don't. Why is that' is the question?
Alex Jones is a better filmmaker than Michael Moore. Alex Jones touched base on Norad standing down and Mr. Moore wouldn't touch that... Look up: Operation Northwoods... Identical to the attacks of 9/11. Moore made fun of Bush and didn't tackle the hard issues that needed to be exposed.
A liberal who uses Michael Moore and his work as their basis for arguement don't represent the rest of the liberal nationm, but a lot of conservatives tend to really believe that they do. Funny.
Hey buddy, don't ever call me a liberal again. I'm a Democrat and that's that! You' know what this thread is about. And it just so happens, I like Moores films. Nothing wrong with that!
