Woodson. Who cares. I hope the reporters just boo him.
But Dolan won't take any questions, as is his sh!tty way.
The spoiled child king has a new coach for his favorite toy.
I'd be shocked if Dolan faces the media tonight.
MSG3 wrote:I'd be shocked if Dolan faces the media tonight.
he'll introduce the coach, won't take any questions.
Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
"They're all temporary, baby." - James Dolan's new blues song.
Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
Knicksfan wrote:Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
I would prefer "F U DOLAN"
Mike Woodson is as boring as Mike Brown. Both coaches look alike.
Knicksfan wrote:Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan Sucks". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
fixed
crzymdups wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
I would prefer "F U DOLAN"
Man if that were said on MSG blogs knick board
it would earn a "Ban" for 1 yr
crzymdups wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
I would prefer "F U DOLAN"
I am, however, a man of compromise and would accept this proposal
SupremeCommander wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Hope the crowd is ready to chant "Fire Dolan Sucks". Yes, he is the boss, but the message will come across.
fixed
thanks! 
Or, as someone in this board once wrote -- 'DUCK FOLAN'
as far as chants go, how about: TRADE CAR - MEL - O. CLAP CLAP. CLAPCLAPCLAP.
Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
Now we are equal with lakers in number of coaches since 1990 - 11.
Now we need to catch up in championships but changing coaches is part of the big city way.
mrKnickShot wrote:Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
Now we are equal with lakers in number of coaches since 1990 - 11.
Now we need to catch up in championships but changing coaches is part of the big city way.
that's some pretty healthy rationalizing you just did there.
the lakers had a rough 90s after winning 5 rings in the 80s. then they won 5 rings in 00s.
how can you possibly compare this crap franchise to the way the lakers have run theirs the last 20 years?
crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
Now we are equal with lakers in number of coaches since 1990 - 11.
Now we need to catch up in championships but changing coaches is part of the big city way.
that's some pretty healthy rationalizing you just did there.
the lakers had a rough 90s after winning 5 rings in the 80s. then they won 5 rings in 00s.
how can you possibly compare this crap franchise to the way the lakers have run theirs the last 20 years?
I am not comparing at all. I am just making a point that changing coaches often does not mean it is the wrong move. The lakers had many coaches that did not work and changed them frequently. Eventually, they got back to winning with PJax.
Changing coaches frequently != bad franchise
A douche owner who cares too much about money and not enough about the team - that is what kill franchises.
mrKnickShot wrote:crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
Now we are equal with lakers in number of coaches since 1990 - 11.
Now we need to catch up in championships but changing coaches is part of the big city way.
that's some pretty healthy rationalizing you just did there.
the lakers had a rough 90s after winning 5 rings in the 80s. then they won 5 rings in 00s.
how can you possibly compare this crap franchise to the way the lakers have run theirs the last 20 years?
I am not comparing at all. I am just making a point that changing coaches often does not mean it is the wrong move. The lakers had many coaches that did not work and changed them frequently. Eventually, they got back to winning with PJax.
Changing coaches frequently != bad franchise
A douche owner who cares too much about money and not enough about the team - that is what kill franchises.
the Lakers won 61 games and made the western conference finals in 1998 and that was an off year for them. if the knicks did that, dolan would build a 500-ft statue of himself made of golden candy bars.
there is literally no comparison whatsoever between the two franchises.
Hello Phil Jackson!
(The worst thing that could have happened would have been a killer playoff run... and MDA getting an extension a la Jeff Van Gundy...)
It is Phil Jackson time... in 4 months.
-KD
crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Bippity10 wrote:New, temporary coach
Now we are equal with lakers in number of coaches since 1990 - 11.
Now we need to catch up in championships but changing coaches is part of the big city way.
that's some pretty healthy rationalizing you just did there.
the lakers had a rough 90s after winning 5 rings in the 80s. then they won 5 rings in 00s.
how can you possibly compare this crap franchise to the way the lakers have run theirs the last 20 years?
I am not comparing at all. I am just making a point that changing coaches often does not mean it is the wrong move. The lakers had many coaches that did not work and changed them frequently. Eventually, they got back to winning with PJax.
Changing coaches frequently != bad franchise
A douche owner who cares too much about money and not enough about the team - that is what kill franchises.
the Lakers won 61 games and made the western conference finals in 1998 and that was an off year for them. if the knicks did that, dolan would build a 500-ft statue of himself made of golden candy bars.
there is literally no comparison whatsoever between the two franchises.
You are preaching to the choir my friend.
