Knicks · 3rd Seed in Sight (page 2)

Knicks                                       Sixers
March
 ------------------------------------------  Mon, Mar 19 	@ Charlotte Bobcats		
Tue, Mar 20 	Toronto Raptors                            
Wed, Mar 21 	@ Philadelphia 76ers         Wed, Mar 21 	New York Knicks
Fri, Mar 23 	@ Toronto Raptors	     Fri, Mar 23 	Boston Celtics 			
Sat, Mar 24 	Detroit Pistons 
-------------------------------------------  Sun, Mar 25 	@ San Antonio Spurs			
Mon, Mar 26 	Milwaukee Bucks 
-------------------------------------------  Tue, Mar 27 	Cleveland Cavaliers				
Wed, Mar 28 	Orlando Magic				
Fri, Mar 30 	@ Atlanta Hawks 	     Fri, Mar 30 	@ Washington Wizards			
Sat, Mar 31 	Cleveland Cavaliers          Sat, Mar 31 	Atlanta Hawks
Tue, Apr 3 	@ Indiana Pacers 	     Tue, Apr 3 	@ Miami Heat
-------------------------------------------  Wed, Apr 4 	Toronto Raptors			
Thu, Apr 5 	@ Orlando Magic 
-------------------------------------------  Sat, Apr 7 	Orlando Magic			
Sun, Apr 8 	Chicago Bulls 		     Sun, Apr 8 	@ Boston Celtics	
Tue, Apr 10 	@ Chicago Bulls 	     Tue, Apr 10 	@ New Jersey Nets			
Wed, Apr 11 	@ Milwaukee Bucks 	     Wed, Apr 11 	@ Toronto Raptors			
Fri, Apr 13 	Washington Wizards 	     Fri, Apr 13 	New Jersey Nets			
Sun, Apr 15 	Miami Heat	
-------------------------------------------  Mon, Apr 16 	@ Orlando Magic			
Tue, Apr 17 	Boston Celtics 		     Tue, Apr 17 	Indiana Pacers		
Wed, Apr 18 	@ New Jersey Nets	     Wed, Apr 18 	@ Cleveland Cavaliers	
Fri, Apr 20 	@ Cleveland Cavaliers		
-------------------------------------------  Sat, Apr 21 	@ Indiana Pacers		
Sun, Apr 22 	@ Atlanta Hawks 	
-------------------------------------------  Mon, Apr 23 	@ New Jersey Nets			
Wed, Apr 25 	Los Angeles Clippers 	     Wed, Apr 25 	@ Milwaukee Bucks			
Thu, Apr 26 	@ Charlotte Bobcats 	     Thu, Apr 26 	@ Detroit Pistons					
	

By my strong estimation they will have an easier schedule, but we have Lin on our side.

nixluva, I admire your formatting skills.

MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:I count 7 Tough Cookies for Knicks and 5 Tough Cookies for Sixers (included us as a Tough Cookie for them!).

By my strong estimation they will have an easier schedule, but we have Lin on our side.

nixluva, I admire your formatting skills.

Yeah it took me a little bit to put it together The Knicks road is definitely tougher than Philly. This is what makes it very hard for the Knicks to catch them, but really it's gonna be about how serious the Knicks are about playing D every night. If the Knicks defend, they will win a majority of their games. This team is just too deep to fail if they all commit to D. I think they really are finally ready to give a consistent effort. That last game said a lot to me. That's the kind of game that tells you a team is locked in and can go on a run, much like during Linsanity.

eViL wrote:let's go!!

That Woody smiley is just a touch too small now. If you can make it a bit bigger then it would be perfect! Just my .02

nixluva wrote:

MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:I count 7 Tough Cookies for Knicks and 5 Tough Cookies for Sixers (included us as a Tough Cookie for them!).

By my strong estimation they will have an easier schedule, but we have Lin on our side.

nixluva, I admire your formatting skills.

Yeah it took me a little bit to put it together The Knicks road is definitely tougher than Philly. This is what makes it very hard for the Knicks to catch them, but really it's gonna be about how serious the Knicks are about playing D every night. If the Knicks defend, they will win a majority of their games. This team is just too deep to fail if they all commit to D. I think they really are finally ready to give a consistent effort. That last game said a lot to me. That's the kind of game that tells you a team is locked in and can go on a run, much like during Linsanity.

It is the games against weaker opponents that worry me. I have no doubt they will show up for the Tough Cookie games; in this way, we might have an advantage over the Sixers because our Tough Cookies are games that will draw the best from us!

nixluva wrote:

eViL wrote:let's go!!

That Woody smiley is just a touch too small now. If you can make it a bit bigger then it would be perfect! Just my .02

hmmm, for it to fit nicely into our forums, it has to be of similar size to the others. It can be wide, but we are limited on height.

martin wrote:

nixluva wrote:

eViL wrote:let's go!!

That Woody smiley is just a touch too small now. If you can make it a bit bigger then it would be perfect! Just my .02

hmmm, for it to fit nicely into our forums, it has to be of similar size to the others. It can be wide, but we are limited on height.

This should give you a better perspective of what I see. Gotta at least be as big as the Pringles smiley. LOL

eViL wrote:i made it 15 pixels by 15 pixels which is what i think the other ones are (except pringles).

GOTTA MATCH THE PRINGLES SMILEY SIZE!!! The Pringles one is definitely Wider than all the rest. Can't have Woody be smaller. Must increase his Girth. Woody isn't a small man after all.

nixluva wrote:

eViL wrote:i made it 15 pixels by 15 pixels which is what i think the other ones are (except pringles).

GOTTA MATCH THE PRINGLES SMILEY SIZE!!! The Pringles one is definitely Wider than all the rest. Can't have Woody be smaller. Must increase his Girth. Woody isn't a small man after all.

wow!! from staunch MDA defender to publicly demanding woody's girth!!! scandalous!!!

He looks like a "South Park" head. Woodsons is kind of like a cantaloupe,a sort of oval.

Nalod wrote:But his head is not as wide as the one depicted.

He looks like a "South Park" head. Woodsons is kind of like a cantaloupe,a sort of oval.

HA! Yeah but I really don't want to see Woody come up short in a thread where both heads are present. Maybe we can get a compromise between the wide girth Woody and the standard Woody. That Pringles head is huge!

eViL wrote:it's true. his head should actually be more narrow.

try the opposite dimensions of the pringles icon: more tall than wide, i think we can handle that

Uptown wrote:Just looking over both schedules, we have a better shot at catching and surpassing Boston than Philly. I dont see Philly losing more than 27 or 28 games for the season. We are already at 24 with some tough games coming up. Boston, on the other hand still has some tough games and may fall to us.

Philly has been so tough all year. This 3 game losing streak is about the only gift we're likely to get unless they lose a trap game against

Knicks                                       Sixers
March
 ------------------------------------------  Mon, Mar 19 	@ Charlotte Bobcats		
Tue, Mar 20 	Toronto Raptors                            
Wed, Mar 21 	@ Philadelphia 76ers         Wed, Mar 21 	New York Knicks
Fri, Mar 23 	@ Toronto Raptors	     Fri, Mar 23 	Boston Celtics 			
Sat, Mar 24 	Detroit Pistons 
-------------------------------------------  Sun, Mar 25 	@ San Antonio Spurs			
Mon, Mar 26 	Milwaukee Bucks 
-------------------------------------------  Tue, Mar 27 	Cleveland Cavaliers				
Wed, Mar 28 	Orlando Magic				
Fri, Mar 30 	@ Atlanta Hawks 	     Fri, Mar 30 	@ Washington Wizards			
Sat, Mar 31 	Cleveland Cavaliers          Sat, Mar 31 	Atlanta Hawks

It seems to me that if the Knicks can beat Toronto to stay even with the Sixers who will likely beat Charlotte, then we have a chance to beat the Sixers and get to 3 games back and then have to hope that the Celtics can step up and knock off the Sixers for us. Then maybe the Spurs do us a further favor and beat the Sixers. Of course we can't have any slip up ourselves, but we can get as close as 2 games back with some good luck.

The more realistic path as you say is to pass Boston tho.

martin wrote:

eViL wrote:it's true. his head should actually be more narrow.

try the opposite dimensions of the pringles icon: more tall than wide, i think we can handle that

Egg-shaped?

BasketballJones wrote:

martin wrote:

eViL wrote:it's true. his head should actually be more narrow.

try the opposite dimensions of the pringles icon: more tall than wide, i think we can handle that

Egg-shaped?

upside-down egg

martin wrote:

BasketballJones wrote:

martin wrote:

eViL wrote:it's true. his head should actually be more narrow.

try the opposite dimensions of the pringles icon: more tall than wide, i think we can handle that

Egg-shaped?

upside-down egg

gettin warmer?

eViL wrote:

martin wrote:

BasketballJones wrote:

martin wrote:

eViL wrote:it's true. his head should actually be more narrow.

try the opposite dimensions of the pringles icon: more tall than wide, i think we can handle that

Egg-shaped?

upside-down egg

gettin warmer?

I'm curious did you resize your graphic using vector or bitmap? It looks like it's suffering from too low resolution. It's like an 1980's Atari game character now. You want to be able to resize and keep the quality at a level where it's still a smooth circle or oval!