Knicks · This euphoria is a little over the top (page 12)
THE ROAD TO MEDIOCRITY
It all depends on how you look at it. Its the core of eternal triangle struggle between the Haters, Sombers and Homers. In a word its "expectations".
That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards! 
ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.
Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.
but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.
You speak as if we've been to the postseason frequently lol. Like we're some sort of Spurs organization that is expected to compete for the ring.
This is new territory for the Knicks. We got swept 2 years ago, won 1 game last season, and won a round this year.
Of course, it would've been nice to get to the ECF, but it's been 13-14 years since we've been in this position.
Ehh phuck it, no need to explain our awful history. We're mediocre!
Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.
If its all about post-season and championships then there's about 25 teams along with the Knicks in a traffic jam on the same mediocre road because none of them have a shot to win it all or even advance to the finals...
Uptown wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.If its all about post-season and championships then there's about 25 teams along with the Knicks in a traffic jam on the same mediocre road because none of them have a shot to win it all or even advance to the finals...
Nevermind Uptown, if we're not competing for rings on an annual basis, we're mediocre! 
Uptown wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.If its all about post-season and championships then there's about 25 teams along with the Knicks in a traffic jam on the same mediocre road because none of them have a shot to win it all or even advance to the finals...
Right but many of them are rebuilding rather than being teams with mostly 10 to 20 year veterans.
29 wins and no playoffs! We're not happy!
IT and Starmoobles and the truck! We're not happy!
No rings in 40 years! We're not happy!
Nate shooting at the wrong basket! We're not happy!
Al Harrington slapping backboards! We're not happy!
3 years of rebuilding and cap spacing and marginal draft picks! Wait!!! We WERE happy!
DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the champions
jrodmc wrote:Sombers need change!:29 wins and no playoffs! We're not happy!
IT and Starmoobles and the truck! We're not happy!
No rings in 40 years! We're not happy!
Nate shooting at the wrong basket! We're not happy!
Al Harrington slapping backboards! We're not happy!3 years of rebuilding and cap spacing and marginal draft picks! Wait!!! We WERE happy!
Now, you're just making stuff up. Many here have not been happy with what Dolan's done over the past 10 years - including both the failed starphucking and the brief failed rebuilding with draft picks.
Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the champions
Did you read the Magic Johnson article about the state of the KNicks. Was pretty spot on imo.
DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the championsDid you read the Magic Johnson article about the state of the KNicks. Was pretty spot on imo.
Is that this here? http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-04...
The Heat are better than the Knicks but they're still not very impressive to me. Wade is aging badly. I think a few western conference teams will surpass them.
Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the championsDid you read the Magic Johnson article about the state of the KNicks. Was pretty spot on imo.
Is that this here? http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-04...
The Heat are better than the Knicks but they're still not very impressive to me. Wade is aging badly. I think a few western conference teams will surpass them.
Not that article.
This one.
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/knicks/...
Basically saying the Knicks are the 4th best team in the East.
Bonn1997 wrote:jrodmc wrote:Sombers need change!:29 wins and no playoffs! We're not happy!
IT and Starmoobles and the truck! We're not happy!
No rings in 40 years! We're not happy!
Nate shooting at the wrong basket! We're not happy!
Al Harrington slapping backboards! We're not happy!3 years of rebuilding and cap spacing and marginal draft picks! Wait!!! We WERE happy!
Now, you're just making stuff up. Many here have not been happy with what Dolan's done over the past 10 years - including both the failed starphucking and the brief failed rebuilding with draft picks.
I'm making stuff up? Who's talking about the past 10 years? I said 3 years; smaller sample size, I know, but I thought the consensus Somber Happyrite UK view was that Walsh was actually sort of in charge up until the Melo trade debacle/breakdown/collapse/trainwreck/fiasco?
jrodmc wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:jrodmc wrote:Sombers need change!:29 wins and no playoffs! We're not happy!
IT and Starmoobles and the truck! We're not happy!
No rings in 40 years! We're not happy!
Nate shooting at the wrong basket! We're not happy!
Al Harrington slapping backboards! We're not happy!3 years of rebuilding and cap spacing and marginal draft picks! Wait!!! We WERE happy!
Now, you're just making stuff up. Many here have not been happy with what Dolan's done over the past 10 years - including both the failed starphucking and the brief failed rebuilding with draft picks.I'm making stuff up? Who's talking about the past 10 years? I said 3 years; smaller sample size, I know, but I thought the consensus Somber Happyrite UK view was that Walsh was actually sort of in charge up until the Melo trade debacle/breakdown/collapse/trainwreck/fiasco?
You mentioned 29 wins, IT, Marbury, Nate, and Al Harrington. You really don't understand why I thought you were talking about the past 10 years?
ChuckBuck wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the championsDid you read the Magic Johnson article about the state of the KNicks. Was pretty spot on imo.
Is that this here? http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-04...
The Heat are better than the Knicks but they're still not very impressive to me. Wade is aging badly. I think a few western conference teams will surpass them.Not that article.
This one.
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/knicks/...
Basically saying the Knicks are the 4th best team in the East.
Eh there's nothing original or surprising in the article.
Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:If 54 Wins is mediocre, I can't wait to see what truly euphoric is (73 wins?)!That's it! We beat the 96 Bulls record with 73 wins and reel off 34 wins in a row, then sweep the playoffs 18-0...
Nah, someone here will still find fault in that. 9 losses! Couldn't go 82-0! SMDH, damn 9 loss losers...
Mediocre bastards!
Unless you're new to the game, you should know by now that people give more weight to the post-season than the regular season. No one said 54 wins was mediocre - they may have implied that it's irrelevant if it's followed by a 6-6 post-season though.but getting to the 2nd round and losing to Indian...a team that I came to recognize as superior to New York IS nothing to be ashamed of either. Sometimes the better man or team does win.
Unless Miami makes a comeback, I guess we can say we lost to the team that lost to the team that lost to the championsDid you read the Magic Johnson article about the state of the KNicks. Was pretty spot on imo.
Is that this here? http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2013-04...
The Heat are better than the Knicks but they're still not very impressive to me. Wade is aging badly. I think a few western conference teams will surpass them.Not that article.
This one.
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/knicks/...
Basically saying the Knicks are the 4th best team in the East.
Eh there's nothing original or surprising in the article.
Yup, basically telling your boy Tyson Chandler learn how to not suck so much in the postseason.