mrKnickShot wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Lakers lose - Bryant with 43 points on 14 for 32! I hate KobeBury ball!
43 points on 32 shots is pretty good. The rest of his team was 21 for 58. You seem obsessed with Melo-Kobe comparisons.
Hows 12 for 26?
How dare you blaspheme against the great Kobe? He's miles ahead of that chucker StarYoutubeMelobury in efficiency and large sample size!
mrKnickShot wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Lakers lose - Bryant with 43 points on 14 for 32! I hate KobeBury ball!
43 points on 32 shots is pretty good. The rest of his team was 21 for 58. You seem obsessed with Melo-Kobe comparisons.
Hows 12 for 26?
Better than 12 for 27 but worse than 12 for 25.
McGee pulling a Jerome James on Denver.
I just don't know how the Nuggets overcome Gallo's obvious 4-13 +4 talent. I guess that's better than 3-13 and worse than 5-13.
They barely won folks. Let's not go nuts. Bynum looked like he was sleepwalking through most of that. He wakes up next game, close out.
I wonder (not really) why Birdman's not been playing for a month and a half?
jrodmc wrote:I just don't know how the Nuggets overcome Gallo's obvious 4-13 +4 talent. I guess that's better than 3-13 and worse than 5-13.They barely won folks. Let's not go nuts. Bynum looked like he was sleepwalking through most of that. He wakes up next game, close out.
I wonder (not really) why Birdman's not been playing for a month and a half?

The Black Mamba went out of his mind but it wasn't enough to put away those pesky nuggets. Coach Karl gets to smile for another day.
Iso Paul ball?
AnubisADL wrote:Iso Paul ball? 
PaulyBury
Blake Griffin injured his knee.

Knee injuries this season seems out of control.
wow if we tanked--wed be playing the C's in round 2!! luck of the irish!!
Atlanta is such an enigma.
Smith is a talented as they come. Yet he can't put it all together.
AnubisADL wrote:Al Horford > Amare
He certainly is but he just cost his team the series - missing a free throw with 2 seconds left
I guess you're just allowed to foul a shooter in the last second from his own half, huh? That's two games tonight it happened.
markvmc wrote:I guess you're just allowed to foul a shooter in the last second from his own half, huh? That's two games tonight it happened.
Not sure what you mean.
I mean in both games so far tonight, the shooter was fouled, as the clock expired, but there was no call either time.
markvmc wrote:I mean in both games so far tonight, the shooter was fouled, as the clock expired, but there was no call either time.
Oh the heave - Yeah there looked like there was contact but no road team is getting that call
Yeah, I know they're not making the call. That's exactly what's ridiculous about it though. NBA rules only apply at certain times and to certain players.
markvmc wrote:Yeah, I know they're not making the call. That's exactly what's ridiculous about it though. NBA rules only apply at certain times and to certain players.
It has never been fair and consistent. That goes for all sports - as long as humans are in control then it will always be this way.
mrKnickShot wrote:markvmc wrote:Yeah, I know they're not making the call. That's exactly what's ridiculous about it though. NBA rules only apply at certain times and to certain players.
It has never been fair and consistent. That goes for all sports - as long as humans are in control then it will always be this way.
so you think robot refs can do better?
BasketballJones wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:markvmc wrote:Yeah, I know they're not making the call. That's exactly what's ridiculous about it though. NBA rules only apply at certain times and to certain players.
It has never been fair and consistent. That goes for all sports - as long as humans are in control then it will always be this way.
so you think robot refs can do better?
it fixed the strike zone - but yes. Absolutely.