I would still trade Tyson + Amare for Dwight, Turk and maybe redick.
C - Dwight
PF - Turk, Melo, Jorts
SF - Melo
PG - Lin + FA + TD
SG - Fields, Redick, Shump
I think it is more of a fit for what the Knicks are trying to run and less redundant
he wants to go to brooklyn
I think he might be willing to play in NY - or maybe not. Who knows - its worth a try
you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
mrKnickShot wrote:I think he might be willing to play in NY - or maybe not. Who knows - its worth a try
i would do it talent wise but Dwight has proven to me that he is a big baby. Also he has a hard on for deron williams for a while now. I mean i have never haerd him interested in teh knicks only the nets
nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
mrKnickShot wrote:nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
The problem is that dwight would be gone in a year. I mean he wants the nets and thats it from what he has said.
IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
The problem is that dwight would be gone in a year. I mean he wants the nets and thats it from what he has said.
He would obviously have to sign
mrKnickShot wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
The problem is that dwight would be gone in a year. I mean he wants the nets and thats it from what he has said.
He would obviously have to sign
Of course and maybe if deron went the dallas he would but i just dont trust him. He changes his mind all the time
IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
The problem is that dwight would be gone in a year. I mean he wants the nets and thats it from what he has said.
He would obviously have to sign
Of course and maybe if deron went the dallas he would but i just dont trust him. He changes his mind all the time
No trust involved. Knicks can't do it if Dwight does not extend.
mrKnickShot wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:nyk4ever wrote:you really think you're in the minority about that? it would be impossible to turn that trade down...
Well ... I remember this trade suggestion in a previous post(s) and many rejected the idea
How about if we had to throw in shump?
Tyson/Amare/Shump for Howard/Turk/Redick
I still do it.
The problem is that dwight would be gone in a year. I mean he wants the nets and thats it from what he has said.
He would obviously have to sign
Of course and maybe if deron went the dallas he would but i just dont trust him. He changes his mind all the time
No trust involved. Knicks can't do it if Dwight does not extend.
ya i mean i would do it if he would extend but i for some reason he has his heart set on the nets
So amar'e is finished because he has a bulging disc, but Howard is going to be fine after having back surgery for a herniated disc?
smackeddog wrote:So amar'e is finished because he has a bulging disc, but Howard is going to be fine after having back surgery for a herniated disc?
Amare does not just have a back problem. He has eye, knee, back and (lack of) explosive issues. Do you think Howard's contract will be insurable?
I just dont see it happening. I'd rather just go with what we have now especially since we have had to deal with the melo/d'antoni crap last year. I mean Dwight will be crying when woodson gets on him the first time i imagine
Makes sense but it wont happen...theres no chance of that happening at all
Combining the drama mama of the 2010-2011 season with the drama mama of the 2011-2012 season would make for a pretty unlikeable team in my opinion.
Pre-injury I would have done it. Now I don't want to give up that much. I would trade Amare and parts. Then trade Tyson for a high end SG. Of ORL doesn't do it phuck them and phuck Howard too.
That would be a terrible deal for the Knicks. Howard is not much of an upgrade over Chandler then throw in STAT to boot?
CashMoney wrote:That would be a terrible deal for the Knicks. Howard is not much of an upgrade over Chandler then throw in STAT to boot?
Can he get a rim shot.
