Wait, I thought Melo did his mutiny cuz he wanted the ball? You get Lin and Nash, and an active Amare again you got some nice ball movement but then that slug Melo again holding the ball?
So, is this a chemistry thing again?
Put Novak or Extra E in the corner why not just bring back MDA?
This team just seems to chase its tail!
So where are we getting a cheap 2 guard :)
Agree 100% I thought we we were finallh getting back to knicks basketball now we are back to Dantoni ball without Dantoni!
if u are checking the current news J.Lin will get a loaded contract offer
which can kick in yr 2, 3 up to $$$ mils per yr the Knicks will be hard
pressed to match from Houston Rockets
J.Lin has a 50-50 chance to end up a Rocket or Maverick
you'd think he's going to be a Knick if Nash is here ?
*smiles the board has become funny, its like trade everyone now that Nets are relevant talk
and knicks aren't doing anything or can do deals worthwhile
I think its a real possibility houston, dallas and toronto's offers are so incomprehensible that even the knicks get priced out. Its not just the board in full panic mode. Most importantly its Dolan
The 1st thing I though was "now we get Nash?". WTF? This team is hilariously sad when u think we had made the shift to Melo ball with Woody and defense and now they're headed right back to MDA's playbook! Not that I'm complaining cuz I happen to be a big believer in his offense but WTF is the deal with change of plans?
The thought process had to be that it was as clear to them that MOST of the team was gonna play best in MDA's style! STAT in particular but also Tyson, Novak and role players in general. If you bring in Nash you have to let him do his thing and get out the way. TEAM BALL works and i guess they figured out you cant abandon team ball for one guy when your paying tons of cash to other players that need team ball to thrive. I guess it'll be MDA's Revenge! LOL 
All the reason we should not have bothered with Nash to begin with
gunsnewing wrote:All the reason we should not have bothered with Nash to begin with
Lets say shumpert comes back good as new with no effects which is a big IF and we get kidd do you honestly think we will go far.
IrishKnickFan wrote:gunsnewing wrote:All the reason we should not have bothered with Nash to begin with
Lets say shumpert comes back good as new with no effects which is a big IF and we get kidd do you honestly think we will go far.
I guess it depends on how much Lin and Shump develop! It's still a good back court with loads of potential. If they add Kidd you have a steady leader to help teach our young guards. Far from a bad situation.
nixluva wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:gunsnewing wrote:All the reason we should not have bothered with Nash to begin with
Lets say shumpert comes back good as new with no effects which is a big IF and we get kidd do you honestly think we will go far.
I guess it depends on how much Lin and Shump develop! It's still a good back court with loads of potential. If they add Kidd you have a steady leader to help teach our young guards. Far from a bad situation.
Ya i never said i didnt wnat shumpert but his injury really hurt us in my opinion. Its a seriosu injury that will keeep him out most of the season and even when he comes back it might take him a while to get back to normal if he ever does. We dint have a young team if we were gonna win it was gonna be within 2-3 yaesr unless we pull off a miracle and get paul
