mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
well, the knicks literally have no chance of acquiring chris paul if they don't re-sign Lin. and even if they do re-sign Lin they have no chance of acquiring chris paul.
and since when is chris paul gonna beat the heat?
crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
well, the knicks literally have no chance of acquiring chris paul if they don't re-sign Lin. and even if they do re-sign Lin they have no chance of acquiring chris paul.
and since when is chris paul gonna beat the heat?
Chris Paul would at least give them a chance.
AnubisADL wrote:Dam. Cant wait to see Felton and Shumpert in the backcourt. 2 Rottweilers in the backcourt.Small ball lineup. AKA the beat the Heat lineup.
Amare
Melo
Smith
Shumpert
Felton
My view of competing with the Heat is to beat them at every other position that's not Bron and Wade..that means PG, PF, C and the bench...Defense has to be big with this team, man I can't wait...
JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
agreed. knicks fans always operate under the assumption that we're one big trade away from competing. this is what lands us the zach randolphs, eddy currys and carmelo anthonys of the world.
we are not one trade away, guys. unless that trade is amar'e for lebron. then maybe.
JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
The 90's Knicks were always right there, down to the wire. They made 2 Finals appearances and they fought some fought ECF battles when they weren't in the Finals. Let's see if this team can even come close to duplicating those playoff performances before we say if they're a contender or not. They have a lot to prove.
CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
again, this is kinda the "we were one trade away..." fallacy. i always think it, too. i always want to think there's this one trade that will be the magic salve.
there usually isn't that one trade.
CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
Hey what's wrong with Kiki, Ro Blackman, Xman, Charles Smith and D Harper??
mrKnickShot wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
i heard this young stud jeremy lin is available because his idiot original team is to stupid to sign him.
JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
The 90's Knicks were always right there, down to the wire. They made 2 Finals appearances and they fought some fought ECF battles when they weren't in the Finals. Let's see if this team can even come close to duplicating those playoff performances before we say if they're a contender or not. They have a lot to prove.
They do and it will be a telling year.
I think that the only team better then them in the east is Miami.
I am rooting for at least a competitive ECF and my expectations were met and surpassed.
crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
i heard this young stud jeremy lin is available because his idiot original team is to stupid to sign him.
Is he better than Doc Rivers and Ron Harper?
mrKnickShot wrote:crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
i heard this young stud jeremy lin is available because his idiot original team is to stupid to sign him.
Is he better than Doc Rivers and Ron Harper?
the knicks never had ron harper.
he's better than this guy though:
holfresh wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
Hey what's wrong with Kiki, Ro Blackman, Xman, Charles Smith and D Harper??
Kiki sucked, Ro was over the hill, Xman only played 1 season, D Harper was on the decline but played well and Charles Smith is a 6'11 soft bitch who can dunk a dman ball when he's 2 inches away from a damn rim.
Thinking back I'm amazed they played as well as they did.
crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:crzymdups wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
i heard this young stud jeremy lin is available because his idiot original team is to stupid to sign him.
Is he better than Doc Rivers and Ron Harper?
the knicks never had ron harper.
he's better than this guy though:
Sorry - Derrick Harper - if you did not pick that up yourself :-)
mrKnickShot wrote:CashMoney wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:PresIke wrote:beat the heat?lol
felton...surely the answer to it all!
There ain't no answer unless his name is Chris Paul
Well then, type to pack it in and start rebuilding again.
Thats if we only build for rings and not to be a playoff team where anything can happen.
If the Heat stay healthy, they are not really beatable.
Should all teams then rebuild?
It's all about winning a title. That's why they play the games. It would be different if they were "close" but if they need someone the caliber of Paul (who they can't get) then we're talking about a team that wont go far. If you haven't built a title team then, yes, you're constantly rebuilding to do so. There's nothing worse than being some middle of the road team who gets low 1st round picks. I am from the train of thought that you're either in it to win it or you're out of it and building to win it.
So should the knicks have blown it up every year with Ewing? They clearly were not gonna get by Chicago. Unless Jordan fancies baseball.
What happens if Wade rips up his knee? Then its anyones game.
You can only build with what is available to you. I say win 55 games and see what luck can do for you.
They could have gotten past the bulls if the Knicks would have gotten Ewing another stud to play with.
But they could not get him one. And Ewing was a pretty selfish offensive player.
Maybe now they can get Melo a stud to play with?
Ewing was selfish cause he had to be.
STAT is supposed to be the stud.
but stat sux and shoulda been amnestied
