Chuck is killing it at halftime xD
Like I've said numerous times. Felton does not see the entire court. Zeros in on scoring or pick n roll
Papabear wrote:Papabear SaysThe Nets seem man for man have the better team for now. They seem to be in better control. Especially on the boards. Melo must have a great game in order for the Knicks to win. The Nets have too many weapons. This is a game that we will need Amare and Shump at the top of their game in order for us to win. I don't think we win this game. I think down the line towards the end of the season if all goes well with Amare and shump we win.
I have a feeling we will see Money Time today. With 6 minutes left in the game it will begin.
You said
subzero0 wrote:The Nets havent reached their potential yet because they are playing really well and two of their best players arent even at the top of their game yet.
My point is that the Knicks are playing really well--arguably better than the Nets--and two of their (our) best players haven't even taken a dribble once this season. I would say our potential is even higher.
Charles is hilarious. Aundray Blatche was ONE of those idiots in Washington.
Steve Novak gets loose in the second half.
subzero0 wrote:NUPE wrote:subzero0 wrote:Papabear wrote:Papabear SaysThe Nets seem man for man have the better team for now. They seem to be in better control. Especially on the boards. Melo must have a great game in order for the Knicks to win. The Nets have too many weapons. This is a game that we will need Amare and Shump at the top of their game in order for us to win. I don't think we win this game. I think down the line towards the end of the season if all goes well with Amare and shump we win.
Scary thing is I dont think the Nets even reached their potential yet.
Knicks are within 5 without Amar'e and it will be a close game. The Nets are great on paper but neither Deron or JJ have really been great this year. This is a winnable game for the Knicks.
Not sure how you can see your computer with those rose colored glasses on. Amare isnt playing because he is old and hurting. The Knicks have decided to fix the problem by... wait for it... getting older and more injured players. The Nets havent reached their potential yet because they are playing really well and two of their best players arent even at the top of their game yet.
Rose colored glasses? The Knicks are up. Both JJ and Deron shoot below 40% this year. Deron is shooting like 25% from three. It is a winnable game for the Knicks who don't even have their second best player.
"The Knicks should have a bigger lead. They're shooting 50%. They're hitting their 3's....excuse me, they're not hitting their 3's."
...which way are you trying to go with this one Chuck?
I never thought I'd ever say this but I really kind of wish the Knicks had David Lee instead of Amar'e
We play defense.
We shoot better than 48 per cent.
End of story.
SupremeCommander wrote:I never thought I'd ever say this but I really kind of wish the Knicks had David Lee instead of Amar'e
Serious question (not being douchey, I promise): has Lee's defense improved?
Gymkata wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:I never thought I'd ever say this but I really kind of wish the Knicks had David Lee instead of Amar'e
Serious question (not being douchey, I promise): has Lee's defense improved?
Honestly if he still rebounds like a beast and hasn't turned into a stone statue, he would awesome with this Knicks team. Lee wasn't good on defense when he was here, but he at lease could moved his feet and would stay with his man.
"The Spurs have won 12 straight against the Wizards."
"SO HAS EVERYBODY!"
I have to say it again, I love Chuck when he's not talking about the Knicks or meant to be taken serious.
So barkley essentially says, if blatch can play up to his potential the nets will have the edge, said blatch was use to playing with those slackers in DC.
But his not so how are the nets better.
There winning on the boards cause there missing a lot more shots..
then talks about stackhouse veteren leadership..we have a team of veterens with prime talent..
misterearl wrote:We play defense.We shoot better than 48 per cent.
End of story.
not yet still 2 more quarters lol
As I said before the game Knicks are a team that seems smarter and IMO executes at a higher level but Nets are more energetic and get points off the scramble and with their rebounding. That's the only reason they're isn't a bigger Knicks lead.
If Knicks could get serious on the boards they can get a lead on these guys.
Gymkata wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:I never thought I'd ever say this but I really kind of wish the Knicks had David Lee instead of Amar'e
Serious question (not being douchey, I promise): has Lee's defense improved?
honestly I have no idea... but does Amar'e? I guess I'd rather have Lee's rebounding than Amare'e's scoring
Nobody's Perfect
nixluva wrote:If Knicks could get serious on the boards they can get a lead on these guys.
If the Knicks get serious on the boards, that can print the ECF tickets
our rebounding is our biggest weakness. if we can get better as the season goes on we wont lose much
misterearl wrote:Nobody's Perfectnixluva wrote:If Knicks could get serious on the boards they can get a lead on these guys.
If the Knicks get serious on the boards, that can print the ECF tickets
Its ok to be critical yet still root for them
