Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:What happend to the Miami team that had the best record and that winning streak?1. Playoffs and Wades knee is wearing down.
2. Bosh playing on a sprained ankle this series.
3 Pacers are a bad match for them and they are playing better as the playoffs go.
regarding the "love", is it no ok to be a basketball fan and appreciate good ball even if its not your team?
Knicks had a great season but they went home.
Miami wins tonight if Indiana doesn't bring it for 48 minutes, if Pacers bring it for 48 min Miami loses because of the pressure playing trying to meet fans expectation.
Damn, thats some in depth kind of analysis that most folk just Don't get to see in everyday life!
yo, check it out, I got one too:
The team that scores the most points, "WINS"!
You heard it here first!
You want "MORE" in-depth analysis watch and listen to Shaq Ernie Kenny and Charles
Indiana showed you why they lost. Calls gives your players confidence Nuff said.
playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:What happend to the Miami team that had the best record and that winning streak?1. Playoffs and Wades knee is wearing down.
2. Bosh playing on a sprained ankle this series.
3 Pacers are a bad match for them and they are playing better as the playoffs go.
regarding the "love", is it no ok to be a basketball fan and appreciate good ball even if its not your team?
Knicks had a great season but they went home.
Miami wins tonight if Indiana doesn't bring it for 48 minutes, if Pacers bring it for 48 min Miami loses because of the pressure playing trying to meet fans expectation.
Damn, thats some in depth kind of analysis that most folk just Don't get to see in everyday life!
yo, check it out, I got one too:
The team that scores the most points, "WINS"!
You heard it here first!
You want "MORE" in-depth analysis wath and listen to Shaq Ernie Kenny and Charles
Wait, I thought you figured out that the home court DIS-Advantage had some traction all by yourself?
playa2 wrote:Indiana showed you why they lost. Calls gives your players confidence Nuff said.
rofl..
tkf wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana showed you why they lost. Calls gives your players confidence Nuff said.
rofl..
Good thing this wasn't a 9gm series.....otherwise playa would have continued to play himself out Yo-Yo
Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs were calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight up as fouls.He would have been on the bench with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff games. Some things never change.
Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
One can look at is that without Granger, the team got better thru the season and stepped up to take defending champ Miami to 7th game!!!
Miami this year had a 27 game winning streak, the 2nd longest of all time!
While Game 7 was hardly a contest, it still went 7.
We basically got our season done without Amare.
3G4G wrote:tkf wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana showed you why they lost. Calls gives your players confidence Nuff said.
rofl..
Good thing this wasn't a 9gm series.....otherwise playa would have continued to play himself out Yo-Yo
haha, this dude is amazing, that is all I have to say... and that is not amazing in a good way..haha
playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
I do think it is interesting how Hibbert was officiated. It was not like they called those kind of plays in the regular season and Roy wasn't always vertical. On top of that he would jump into players with his body. It will be interesting how they call this going forward.
Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
One can look at is that without Granger, the team got better thru the season and stepped up to take defending champ Miami to 7th game!!!
The refs gave them a game with all the abstract calls, no foul call on Hibbert etc... Even teeing up Lebron for asking the ref how was his hotel in Indy LOL. JK
Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
Granger didn't help Pacers win 1 game on the court in the 2nd season. so what are you saying.
playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
Granger didn't help Pacers win 1 game on the court in the 2nd season. so what are you saying.
that you're statement "Indiana had no injuries" made no sense
Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
Granger didn't help Pacers win 1 game on the court in the 2nd season. so what are you saying.
that you're statement "Indiana had no injuries" made no sense
They had NO injuries with the roster that started the playoffs.
Can't you hear ?
playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
Granger didn't help Pacers win 1 game on the court in the 2nd season. so what are you saying.
that you're statement "Indiana had no injuries" made no sense
They had NO injuries with the roster that started the playoffs.
Can't you hear ?
Right, they had old but not new injuries. Is that just some random observation or is there a conclusion or point you were trying to make?
Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
Granger didn't help Pacers win 1 game on the court in the 2nd season. so what are you saying.
that you're statement "Indiana had no injuries" made no sense
They had NO injuries with the roster that started the playoffs.
Can't you hear ?
Right, they had old but not new injuries. Is that just some random observation or is there a conclusion or point you were trying to make?
In my Dennis Green voice: They were who we thought they were, they sucked
So the observation is that they had old but not new injuries, and the inference is they "were who we thought they were, they sucked."
It almost makes sense
At best, you skipped several steps of the argument process.
Bonn1997 wrote:So the observation is that they had old but not new injuries, and the inference is they "were who we thought they were, they sucked."
It almost makes sense
At best, you skipped several steps of the argument process.
You live to argue, I choose to live life, big difference in the approach don't ya think ?
Bonn1997 wrote:playa2 wrote:Nalod wrote:playa2 wrote:Indiana had no injuries, they didn't bring it and put pressure on the heat. They got crushed, they would have lost game 6 in Indy if the refs was calling the Hibbert defending jumping straight fouls.He would have been on the bensch with foul trouble. Long live the refs prolonging and NBA series playoff game.Wake up you all can't be this slow. RIGHT ?????
Granger?
game 6 without The Birdman had a lot to do with how Miami defends.
If its all a "fix", then why do you watch the games?
Granger didn't help the Pacers in the playoffs. And the answer to you 2nd question
I wouldn't have nothing to add to the UK Network
Right, because he was injured!
So you're revising your initial statement to something like "Indiana had no injuries - except for the players who missed the post-season due to injuries."
LOL - priceless.
