Knicks · Phil Jax said we wuz "clumsy".... (page 2)

knicks1248 @ 11/20/2012 10:38 PM
Phil said that base on what he saw last season, and it wasn't just a amare and melo thing, throw tyson in that mix too along with no pg, a shaky ass bench that did not complement each other at all.


The high turnovers last year, the below 500 with melo tyson and amare, melo runing the point for almost a month, and as a team (especially early in the season) were not on the same page..

I still agree with him

Anji @ 11/20/2012 10:39 PM
93BUICK wrote:Clumsanity!

Aaaaah, that's too close.......I wouldn't use that one.

JamesLin @ 11/23/2012 3:09 PM
Phil Jackson is right. I don't see the point of argument. The only thing he wouldn't be able to say was that Felton has improved dramatically. He would've been a good fit. I think Melo would shine in a triangular offense/defense. Amar'e would be a problem in that system and so's Chandler. Would he be a better coach? I don't know, but I definitely know he would be harder to not getting his hands deep into personnel decisions whereas Woodson is a lot more flexible, and that's VERY IMPORTANT to Jimmy D. Phil was never considered mainly because of this boss/coach situation, and you can quote me on that.
knickscity @ 11/23/2012 3:35 PM
JamesLin wrote:Phil Jackson is right. I don't see the point of argument. The only thing he wouldn't be able to say was that Felton has improved dramatically. He would've been a good fit. I think Melo would shine in a triangular offense/defense. Amar'e would be a problem in that system and so's Chandler. Would he be a better coach? I don't know, but I definitely know he would be harder to not getting his hands deep into personnel decisions whereas Woodson is a lot more flexible, and that's VERY IMPORTANT to Jimmy D. Phil was never considered mainly because of this boss/coach situation, and you can quote me on that.

Same reason why the Lakers dissed him. His time has passed. He was a great coach.
CrushAlot @ 11/23/2012 3:41 PM
GustavBahler wrote:No big surprise that Jax wouldn't coach a team that wasn't ready made for a title. When was the last time he did that? the 80s?.
This.
cooch2584 @ 11/23/2012 6:19 PM
Honestly,I dont give a rats butt what jackson says. I really expect him to come out of the woodwork and say something negative about this Knicks team.
tj23 @ 11/23/2012 9:50 PM
JamesKPolk wrote:Amare-Carmelo has not proven it can work, so he is still right.

So far yeah. I'm interested in giving them another shot since this team is rolling and we have a nice group of vets and smart players.
arkrud @ 11/23/2012 11:39 PM
tj23 wrote:
JamesKPolk wrote:Amare-Carmelo has not proven it can work, so he is still right.

So far yeah. I'm interested in giving them another shot since this team is rolling and we have a nice group of vets and smart players.

STAT is another angry body. We have enough anger already. A bit more and it will owerwrite the smarts.
We were climsy just in 2 games... but very climsy.
Hopefully Jax is wrong... should man be wrong at least sometimes?

Page 2 of 2