3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year
Bonn1997 wrote:What PG are you gonna get for Novak? Usually teams are reluctant to trade PGs. I doubt you'll get anyone better than Prig.
The Lakers basically gave away Sessions last season because of expectations. I don't know who that player is this year, but the Knicks should find him. Kidd is not a point guard anymore(plus an overrated defender) and Priggy is a 3rd stringer.
Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
Have you compared Kidd to Lin recently?
I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.
3G4G wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year
Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.
Bonn1997 wrote:I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.
thats awkward. You have it backwards. Kidd is fine at SG as long as he has a PG who can handle, penetrate and kick. Or off the bench in a limited role which he will be once Shump and Felton return
Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year
Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.
Maybe if you are only looking at numbers. There is no stat to illustrate the effectiveness of pushing the ball down the court and penetrating and creating. Both Lin and Felton do this very well.
Kidd and Prigs dont and you are seeing the effects on the Knicks offense
gunsnewing wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
Have you compared Kidd to Lin recently?
Season as a whole, Kidd has been better. Last 10 games, I'd give the edge to Lin.
gunsnewing wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:3G4G wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Any ideas??????????
I'm not sure if I've posted in this thread but since it sits atop ummmmmm 3(1 better than Lin) weren't enough?
I would grant that right now Kidd is probably better than Lin
I figured that point guard was Felton but uhhhh okay Jason's Back Willin. Lin has had more all-around productive games than all of our point guards this year
Lin's in his first 100 games as a PG and is inconsistent. His best games have been better than any of our point guards but when he's at his worst, he is worse than Kidd or Prigs ever are.
Maybe if you are only looking at numbers. There is no stat to illustrate the effectiveness of pushing the ball down the court and penetrating and creating. Both Lin and Felton do this very well.
Kidd and Prigs dont and you are seeing the effects on the Knicks offense
It's fine to give a little weight to pushing the ball up and penetrating. To say that that compensates for being the least efficient scorer in the league at your position (and not even close to the next worst PG) is far-fetched though. The Knicks are an old team that's struggling. They had lost 3 of their last 5 before Felton went down.
if they did other things they would be making big money. Not many complete PGs out there
gunsnewing wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:I think Kidd is fine as a PG but only if you have an SG who can penetrate and is a good passer.
thats awkward. You have it backwards. Kidd is fine at SG as long as he has a PG who can handle, penetrate and kick. Or off the bench in a limited role which he will be once Shump and Felton return
That would work too. You don't think Kidd would be fine at PG if James Harden was his back-court teammate?
gunsnewing wrote:So we have a 3 headed monster at PG and JR Smith runs the offense???
3 Headed? You still see Kidd as a PG?
Felton is out, Pablo is a 3rd string PG, we are playing without a starting PG and a backup PG
You keep brining up Bellinili
But Bellinili was not signed for the veteran's minimum, so we never had a shot, Bull's opted not to use their MLE like Lakers did for Jodie Meek's to save salary
He is strictly a shooter, no DEF, no handle, no versatility at all, there is a reason why CP3 opted not to recruit him to LA Clippers
Janeero Pargo makes the most sense to me, with the way how this team is constructed and how Woodson prefer's veteran's over talent
Some speed/quickness to initiate the offense, allow Kidd conserve his energy and be spot up shooter/snipe, as the 2dary ball handler and more importantly DEF the quicker guards
Garreat Temple if he gets waived by Wizards and Livingston by Cav's
and
make that phone call to Martin's agent
RonRon wrote:gunsnewing wrote:So we have a 3 headed monster at PG and JR Smith runs the offense???
3 Headed? You still see Kidd as a PG?
Felton is out, Pablo is a 3rd string PG, we are playing without a starting PG and a backup PG
You keep brining up Bellinili
But Bellinili was not signed for the veteran's minimum, so we never had a shot, Bull's opted not to use their MLE like Lakers did for Jodie Meek's to save salary
He is strictly a shooter, no DEF, no handle, no versatility at all, there is a reason why CP3 opted not to recruit him to LA Clippers
Janeero Pargo makes the most sense to me, with the way how this team is constructed and how Woodson prefer's veteran's over talent
Some speed/quickness to initiate the offense, allow Kidd conserve his energy and be spot up shooter/snipe, as the 2dary ball handler and more importantly DEF the quicker guards
Garreat Temple if he gets waived by Wizards and Livingston by Cav's
and
make that phone call to Martin's agent
Thats true I didn't expect the Knicks to overpay for Camby and be able to offer Marco more money.
You missed my point. I'm not saying the Knicks have a 3 headed monster at pg. I'm saying many others were saying it and now evidently we only have 1 pg, a 40yr old sg and a 36yr old 3rd string
