OGkush121 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:Nyets losing to Detroit already lmfao
don't they have like a perfect record against .500 teams?just remembered they lost to the Lakers yesterday :)
The 17-0 against sub .500 teams is all they had to fall back on LMFAO. Now they might be 17-2 lol
2nd Qtr 1:25
WAS 46 NYK 48
NYKMentality wrote:gunsnewing wrote:With the Charlotte Hornets return I'd like to see the Bullets
+1.
that arenas gun episode is still fresh in ppls mind..
Reezy always kills us from 3.
Kidd is killing us tonight
good D by STAT making Nene take that shot. W eshould have had Nenes cheapest years!
kidd looks worse than bibby
God help us if Wall gets a decent jump shot
Amare still needs to get his rebound effort up, Im right here looking at him, and it's kinda pitiful
When the Knicks have three guards on the floor I wish melo wouldn't bring the ball up.
signing kidd to a 3 year deal was a mistake. I mean he is already breaking down halfway through
It's not that we're down by 3 heading into the half that has me head scratching, but the fact that we've been out boarded by the count of 19-20. Hopefully Woodson lights a fire under these guys and they come out during the second half dominating the battle of the boards.
knicks1248 wrote:Amare still needs to get his rebound effort up, Im right here looking at him, and it's kinda pitiful
I'm just happy he's playing and getting somewhat back to the all offense terrible D player we all grew to love in is 1st season.
Not taking this game lightly by any means, but given our usual 2nd half performances I fully expect a win.
Not a blowout, but a win. A win would do just fine :)
Harden just made a ridiculous shot
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Amare still needs to get his rebound effort up, Im right here looking at him, and it's kinda pitiful
I'm just happy he's playing and getting somewhat back to the all offense terrible D player we all grew to love in is 1st season.
he's playing very efficiently, really like the way he's playing. Although obviously one would love to see him get 10+ rebounds :)
OGkush121 wrote:Not taking this game lightly by any means, but given our usual 2nd half performances I fully expect a win.
Not a blowout, but a win. A win would do just fine :)
Somehow this team beat the Bulls..who OWN us
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:OGkush121 wrote:Not taking this game lightly by any means, but given our usual 2nd half performances I fully expect a win.
Not a blowout, but a win. A win would do just fine :)
Somehow this team beat the Bulls..who OWN us
I know, I mentioned it just a couple posts back.
Well, somehow the Magic managed to beat the Clippers at home, are winning against them tonight at half-time, and they're 0-3 against the Knicks.
Matchups make a difference :)
OGkush121 wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:OGkush121 wrote:Not taking this game lightly by any means, but given our usual 2nd half performances I fully expect a win.
Not a blowout, but a win. A win would do just fine :)
Somehow this team beat the Bulls..who OWN us
I know, I mentioned it just a couple posts back.
Well, somehow the Magic managed to beat the Clippers at home, are winning against them tonight at half-time, and they're 0-3 against the Knicks.
Matchups make a difference :)
Which makes our last game against the Bulls somewhat important. Maybe we need Derrick Rose on that team to beat them?
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:OGkush121 wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:OGkush121 wrote:Not taking this game lightly by any means, but given our usual 2nd half performances I fully expect a win.
Not a blowout, but a win. A win would do just fine :)
Somehow this team beat the Bulls..who OWN us
I know, I mentioned it just a couple posts back.
Well, somehow the Magic managed to beat the Clippers at home, are winning against them tonight at half-time, and they're 0-3 against the Knicks.
Matchups make a difference :)
Which makes our last game against the Bulls somewhat important. Maybe we need Derrick Rose on that team to beat them?
Worked with Rondo, and it's not like I expected, or expect the Bulls to sweep us.
But I really don't think having their starting PG back would hinder them, if anything it changes the way they play, and that can only be a good thing, because the way they played against us so far they were easily the better team all 3 games.
Although I guess one could point out we weren't full strength either, and in a certain game having someone like Camby back would mean more than having someone like Rose back (even though Rose is clearly the better player). Not saying that's the case in this situation, just saying it generaly.
This lineup with Kidd is a joke. No good shots
