More shooting for NO DEFENSE....THE NYK WAY!
Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
CashMoney wrote:More shooting for NO DEFENSE....THE NYK WAY!
I will miss Shumpert but we still have JR Smith.
DurzoBlint wrote:Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
Its a long shot. Probably unrealistic but Reddick aint changing the landscape of the league alone
gunsnewing wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
Its a long shot. Probably unrealistic but Reddick aint changing the landscape of the league alone
I like Reddick's game but I don't see how adding Reddick would be any better than starting Shump at the 2 and Amare at the 4. Offense is not our problem...it's rebounding.
Doesn't orlando want him for their own "coming home"? They can "Moobitize" his return into a resurection of sorts.
CashMoney wrote:gunsnewing wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
Its a long shot. Probably unrealistic but Reddick aint changing the landscape of the league alone
I like Reddick's game but I don't see how adding Reddick would be any better than starting Shump at the 2 and Amare at the 4. Offense is not our problem...it's rebounding.
Agree 100% kmart, lou Amundson or anyone else whi falls through the cracks after thursday. I would consider giving up on shumps perimter D but not for reddick hickson or milsap. Not worth having a gapping hole defensiveli in the backcourt
gunsnewing wrote:CashMoney wrote:gunsnewing wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
Its a long shot. Probably unrealistic but Reddick aint changing the landscape of the league alone
I like Reddick's game but I don't see how adding Reddick would be any better than starting Shump at the 2 and Amare at the 4. Offense is not our problem...it's rebounding.
Agree 100% kmart, lou Amundson or anyone else whi falls through the cracks after thursday. I would consider giving up on shumps perimter D but not for reddick hickson or milsap. Not worth having a gapping hole defensiveli in the backcourt
Red-Dick is a better defender than shump for the time being.
And its all about the here and now.
Knicks lack toughness not offense. 3rd in the league in offense. 16th in defense
smackeddog wrote:Reddick sounds particularly enthusiastic about the possibility of being traded to NY:Redick: "Could I live in NY? If my job was there, I guess. Not something I'd necessarily choose to do. Feel like I got it out of my system."
http://hoopshype.com/twitter/media.html#...
Another myth potentially debunked I guess...... because we've been told "everybody wants to play in NYC"....only time I've seen this to be true is when DAT paper is righteous
Nalod wrote:gunsnewing wrote:CashMoney wrote:gunsnewing wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:Nalod wrote:We talking Love for Amare?Thts not a fair exchange and Minny don't have the financial where-with-all to take on his uninsured contract.
I wouldn't mind having whatever they are smoking if anyone really believes we could get Love for Amare.
Its a long shot. Probably unrealistic but Reddick aint changing the landscape of the league alone
I like Reddick's game but I don't see how adding Reddick would be any better than starting Shump at the 2 and Amare at the 4. Offense is not our problem...it's rebounding.
Agree 100% kmart, lou Amundson or anyone else whi falls through the cracks after thursday. I would consider giving up on shumps perimter D but not for reddick hickson or milsap. Not worth having a gapping hole defensiveli in the backcourt
Red-Dick is a better defender than shump for the time being.
And its all about the here and now.
Sure but the Knicks need a big. Instead of trying to get JJ why not try and get a player that addresses our need? Heck, why not inquire about a guy like Dejuan Blair?
I'd make the deal if I could get Jameer Nelson to spell Felton and Redick. JJ is a consistent scoring option, something the Knicks need now and Nelson could fortify the backup PG spot. Shumpert for Redick is short-sighted.
I'd make the deal if I could get Jameer Nelson to spell Felton and Redick. JJ is a consistent scoring option, something the Knicks need now and Nelson could fortify the backup PG spot. Shumpert for Redick is short-sighted.
Knicks offense is heavily dependant on Melo. Having another shooter will only help.
AnubisADL wrote:Knicks offense is heavily dependant on Melo. Having another shooter will only help.
Yeah but that's what Melo does. Getting a big who can play some D and most importantly rebound is what we need.
y2zipper wrote:I'd make the deal if I could get Jameer Nelson to spell Felton and Redick. JJ is a consistent scoring option, something the Knicks need now and Nelson could fortify the backup PG spot. Shumpert for Redick is short-sighted.
Knicks are also being conscious of the salary cap. Reddick is 29. I doubt he gets an outrageous deal. Probably 5-7 million per for 4 years.
smackeddog wrote:gunsnewing wrote:I don't trust this Kennedy kid
He may look like a kid, but weirdly he always seems to have great sources- guess players and GMs must think their helping out some school kid with his project.
This trade ain't happening though- Reddick makes $6mil, which makes it difficult for us to match salaries. We'd have to include Shump AND Novak, which makes the trade pointless for us.
Well said
Trade is dumb, Ilike reddick
But NO trade of shump
The knicks our heroes ain't winning nba title this yr even if it traded for Kobe
So what's the point?
Too many gaps next yr will be our turn & Shump need to be part of that!
I like Shump but he is highly over rated. Alot of guys out there say they want proven all stats for Shump....
Someone at work said Calderon for Shump....another said some stupid shit to get Chris Paul.
Shump is a young shooting guard, that can't really shoot. Can dunk but can't really drive. He has a cramping problem and had two major injuries in one season causing him to miss Alot of last year and almost all of this yeaar....i say we sell high while there is ingest and fill in holes.....shump isn't stopping wade. If that's why we got him that's a huge fail. Wade can't be guarded one on one by anyone
CashMoney wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Knicks offense is heavily dependant on Melo. Having another shooter will only help.
Yeah but that's what Melo does. Getting a big who can play some D and most importantly rebound is what we need.
We need 2 way players come playoff time. Chandler is already offensively challenged. Martin and Amundson are still available.
AnubisADL wrote:Knicks offense is heavily dependant on Melo. Having another shooter will only help.
I love the idea of adding more offense to the offense...Redick better get behind our Blackholes in Melo/Earl/Amar'e
3G4G wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Knicks offense is heavily dependant on Melo. Having another shooter will only help.
I love the idea of adding more offense to the offense...Redick better get behind our Blackholes in Melo/Earl/Amar'e
You do realize Melo has no problem passing to guys who can make shots. A contested shot from Melo is more likely to go in than an open shot from our other players except Novak.
