MSG3 wrote:playa2 wrote:Knicks just showed how good they are they spotted the cavs 20 points,, but Mike Breen will never make a comment like that.He is as bad as some of these lame posters
Dude. He's right. He's highlighting all the things fans see.
This.
Denial/fandom sucks
3rd Qtr 3:06
CLE 68 NYK 66
Everyone has flaws. Sometimes its my acquired 11yr pessimism but most times I am right in what I say
mrKnickShot wrote:how are we without Melo but with Stat and TYson?
With all due respect, what a freaking tool you are as a sports fan and poster.
We're 0-1 without Melo during games in which both Stoudemire and Chandler have played. Loss against the Pacers.
We were 18-6 with Melo/Chandler before Stoudemire returned.
We also (only) went 3-4 without Melo last season during games in which Amar'e/Chandler played together.
If you just tried "proving" how Stoudemire/Chandler are "better" when compared to Melo/Chandler, lol, you just failed miserably.
I'm done with this thread, mods must be on vacation.
I don't get it...they are right there and they aren't trying to go to the rim and pick up fouls.
3rd Qtr 0:36
CLE 71 NYK 68
Playing right into the Cavs hands with too much jump shooting.
Ahhhh... breen says knee does not appear to be serious.
ToddTT wrote:Ahhhh... breen says knee does not appear to be serious.
His opinion. No word from locker room.
End of 3rd Qtr
CLE 74 NYK 70
Doesnt appear to be serious? What is that?
NYKMentality wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:how are we without Melo but with Stat and TYson?
With all due respect, what a freaking tool you are as a sports fan and poster.
We're 0-1 without Melo during games in which both Stoudemire and Chandler have played. Loss against the Pacers.
We were 18-6 with Melo/Chandler before Stoudemire returned.
We also (only) went 3-4 without Melo last season during games in which Amar'e/Chandler played together.
If you just tried "proving" how Stoudemire/Chandler are "better" when compared to Melo/Chandler, lol, you just failed miserably.
I think you need to go back and look at your numbers. I am not saying the Stat/Chandler combo is better, but the Knicks started sputtering way before stat came back.
Watch below, as I continue to correct this guy as a tool. He continues to dig until he can no longer dig while proving that he doesn't know as much as he thinks he does.
mrKnickShot wrote:Well maybe the knicks are better with this lineup
NYKMentality wrote:Better without Melo? What a joke. 3-4 without Melo
32-17 with Melo.
But yet, we're a "better team" and/or lineup "without" Carmelo. A bunch of tool post's around here with zero insight. I love it too
He couldn't handle the truth. So he decides to respond with...
mrKnickShot wrote: how are we without Melo but with Stat and TYson
As if he were on the verge of "proving something" other than how wrong he truly is.
Read below for the facts.
NYKMentality wrote:
We're 3-4 without Melo. We're 32-17 with Melo. We're 0-1 without Melo during games in which both Stoudemire and Chandler have played in here in 2012-2013.
We were only 3-4 last season during games in which Melo missed while Amar'e/Chandler played together.
We were 18-6 with Melo/Chandler before Stoudemire returned.
We were 11-5 last season during games in which Stoudemire missed while Melo/Chandler played together.
If he just tried "proving" how Stoudemire/Chandler are "better" when compared to Melo/Chandler, lol, he just failed miserably. And this is coming from an Amar'e supporter.
Ball movement Knicks lead
4th Qtr 9:08
CLE 78 NYK 79
nycisgreat wrote:NYKMentality wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:how are we without Melo but with Stat and TYson?
With all due respect, what a freaking tool you are as a sports fan and poster.
We're 0-1 without Melo during games in which both Stoudemire and Chandler have played. Loss against the Pacers.
We were 18-6 with Melo/Chandler before Stoudemire returned.
We also (only) went 3-4 without Melo last season during games in which Amar'e/Chandler played together.
If you just tried "proving" how Stoudemire/Chandler are "better" when compared to Melo/Chandler, lol, you just failed miserably.
I think you need to go back and look at your numbers. I am not saying the Stat/Chandler combo is better, but the Knicks started sputtering way before stat came back.
This
Bottle it up and drink it before every game Novak
MSG3 wrote:Bottle it up and drink it before every game Novak
its Novakaine
NYKMentality wrote:3-4 without Melo
32-17 with Melo. But yet, we're a "better team" and/or lineup "without" Carmelo. A bunch of tool post's around here with zero insight. I love it too
Someone is irate this team got their act together when someone left the game injured.
