Knicks · Game Thread: Knicks Pistons Motor City Mayhem, Amar'e for 50! 7:30 PM (ET), March 6 (page 10)
Knicksfan wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love wins and Im a fan and all, but the starting lineups of people playing 3 minutes and that's all are just silly.
Since when are starting lineups such cause for widespread panic?
The message is that the team belongs to everyone. Not any one man.
"You play to win the game"
Knicksfan wrote:. Not sure but how many minutes did Monty Williams play in that role for pat Riley.misterearl wrote:ScoreboardKnicksfan wrote:playa2 wrote:They are only a joke when the knicks lose. You want the Pipe ?They won but the starting lineup is still a joke.
Confidence builder
37-21
Don't get me wrong, I love wins and Im a fan and all, but the starting lineups of people playing 3 minutes and that's all are just silly.
JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
We have a winner.
y2zipper wrote:Knicksfan wrote:TeamBall wrote:gunsnewing wrote:So kurt and white start and get pulled after 2mins. Makes all the sense in the world smfhHoward Beck @HowardBeckNYT
Asked Woodson if enough scoring w/this lineup. Why not Amare? "We’re only talking maybe 3 or 4 minutes and then Amar'e will be in the game."This is really stupid
Thank you!
This strategy by Woodson is SO STUPID.
What? Is there a stat that says players get injured only in the first 3 minutes?
Woody has really become a ridiculous clown with his inexplicable actions. His starting lineups are a joke.
The minutes restriction is above his head and remember: this is Dolan and MSG we're talking about. If STAT can't play more than 30, I'll take those 3 or 4 extra minutes in the 4th.
I dont really see how the minutes restriction prevents Amare from starting. Shump is on a restriction and he was thrown into the starting lineup immediately.
misterearl wrote:Hello?Knicksfan wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love wins and Im a fan and all, but the starting lineups of people playing 3 minutes and that's all are just silly.Since when are starting lineups such cause for widespread panic?
The message is that the team belongs to everyone. Not any one man.
"You play to win the game"
Starting lineups have been an issue every time the team starts off flat.
It wasn't the case this time, but it has been before.
And using your starting bench (White, Thomas) more than 3-4 minutes, especially if you are running out of healthy bodies.
But whatever, its a win and all should be peachy! Guess I'll criticize the lineup next time we lose. Seems to be the UK way.
Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
Bunch of bullshit trying to count D'Antoni's 1st 2 seasons as coach and his Toney Douglas at PG season.
Also a bunch of HYPOCRITES on this forum who CRIED about D'Antoni and praise Woodson.
19-16 in the last 35 games. Not the same team that started the season. Stop being hypocrites and johnny come latelys. Don't cherrypick when it comes to criticism. People criticized D'Antoni for a style that couldn't win in the playoffs. This style wont win anything either.
But keep up the hypocritical posting.
JamesKPolk wrote:Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
Bunch of bullshit trying to count D'Antoni's 1st 2 seasons as coach and his Toney Douglas at PG season.
Also a bunch of HYPOCRITES on this forum who CRIED about D'Antoni and praise Woodson.
19-16 in the last 35 games. Not the same team that started the season. Stop being hypocrites and johnny come latelys. Don't cherrypick when it comes to criticism. People criticized D'Antoni for a style that couldn't win in the playoffs. This style wont win anything either.
But keep up the hypocritical posting.
Hypocritical? My response to you didn't praise Woodson, nor did it criticize MDA. I simply responded to your post with facts.
BTW, nevermind the 1st 2 seasons....MDA was 18-24 last year while Woodson took the same exact group and went 18-6. Those are facts, not criticizing or praising....
Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
Bunch of bullshit trying to count D'Antoni's 1st 2 seasons as coach and his Toney Douglas at PG season.
Also a bunch of HYPOCRITES on this forum who CRIED about D'Antoni and praise Woodson.
19-16 in the last 35 games. Not the same team that started the season. Stop being hypocrites and johnny come latelys. Don't cherrypick when it comes to criticism. People criticized D'Antoni for a style that couldn't win in the playoffs. This style wont win anything either.
But keep up the hypocritical posting.
Hypocritical? My response to you didn't praise Woodson, nor did it criticize MDA. I simply responded to your post with facts.
BTW, nevermind the 1st 2 seasons....MDA was 18-24 last year while Woodson took the same exact group and went 18-6. Those are facts, not criticizing or praising....
Those are "facts" without actual facts. Get the point? Can't just print out stats without actually giving a background on them.
The team that was 18-24 was largely that because Carmelo refused to share the ball, we wasted the early part of the season trying to turn Douglas into a PG and our other PG options (Bibby, Davis) were either ineffective or always injured. That record is inflated because every team plays well after a coaching change. Look at the Bucks this season. Is Jim Boylan a good coach? Certainly not but the Bucks are playing better under him than Skiles.
Woodson started off 8-0 and finished 10-6 the rest of the way. We started off 18-5 this year and are now 19-16 in the last 35. Not to mention Woodson's putrid playoff record. Those are the "Facts".
Hopefully Melo is good for tomorrow, really excited to see him go up against Durant.
JamesKPolk wrote:Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:Uptown wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I'm listening to Sczerbiak on the post game and he says "The Knicks are not going to play a traditional lineup. They will play small and live and die by the 3..."My question is how is this any different from Mike D'Anton
MDA
121 W's & 167 L's
Woodson
54 W's & 27 L's
Bunch of bullshit trying to count D'Antoni's 1st 2 seasons as coach and his Toney Douglas at PG season.
Also a bunch of HYPOCRITES on this forum who CRIED about D'Antoni and praise Woodson.
19-16 in the last 35 games. Not the same team that started the season. Stop being hypocrites and johnny come latelys. Don't cherrypick when it comes to criticism. People criticized D'Antoni for a style that couldn't win in the playoffs. This style wont win anything either.
But keep up the hypocritical posting.
Hypocritical? My response to you didn't praise Woodson, nor did it criticize MDA. I simply responded to your post with facts.
BTW, nevermind the 1st 2 seasons....MDA was 18-24 last year while Woodson took the same exact group and went 18-6. Those are facts, not criticizing or praising....
Those are "facts" without actual facts. Get the point? Can't just print out stats without actually giving a background on them.
The team that was 18-24 was largely that because Carmelo refused to share the ball, we wasted the early part of the season trying to turn Douglas into a PG and our other PG options (Bibby, Davis) were either ineffective or always injured. That record is inflated because every team plays well after a coaching change. Look at the Bucks this season. Is Jim Boylan a good coach? Certainly not but the Bucks are playing better under him than Skiles.
Woodson started off 8-0 and finished 10-6 the rest of the way. We started off 18-5 this year and are now 19-16 in the last 35. Not to mention Woodson's putrid playoff record. Those are the "Facts".
So MDA's putrid record with the Knicks has nothing to do with the coach, but is Melo, Dolan, Tony Douglas, Bibby, and Davis's fault? But when Woodson goes 18-6 with the same group, Woodson gets no credit, but its the ineffective and always injured players who get all the credit. Got it!
Why is it so easy for you to offer up excuses for MDA's failures with the Knicks and say my facts aren't 'actual', yet, you call Woodson's putrid playoff record a fact without offering similar 'actual' excuses as you did for MDA?
Every team Woodson lost to in the playoffs was favored to win. He lost to the Celts in 2008 (took the champs to the final game, almost pulled out game 6). Lost to Lebron and the Cavs in the 2nd round in 09' and lost to the Magic in the 2nd round in 10'. His teams beat who they were supposed to beat and lost to better teams....
And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
Mike Woodson was swept out of the playoffs 2 years in a row with the Hawks.
JamesKPolk wrote:CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
Mike Woodson was swept out of the playoffs 2 years in a row with the Hawks.
And where we the Hawks as a franchise before Woody took over?
CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
Mike Woodson was swept out of the playoffs 2 years in a row with the Hawks.
And where we the Hawks as a franchise before Woody took over?
So you're attributing the entire Hawks turnaround to Mike Woodson and not the fact their roster greatly improved when he was named head coach?
Are you also forgetting Woodson's first 4 seasons with Atlanta were a combined 106-222?
Are you saying the acquisitions of Joe Johnson, Al Horford, Josh Smith, Mike Bibby and others to replace the likes of Alan Henderson, Dan Dickau and Shareef Abdur-Rahim had no impact on the Hawks fortunes?
Okay.
Only this forum can turn a painfully mediocre coach into an excellent one. I've already provided quotes on what Hawks fans think of the "genius" of Mike Woodson and they don't miss him at all.
We played flat, but won- hopefully we still have plenty of energy for the Thunder game.
Well, we've won the games we had to lately- now the month of hell begins!
AnubisADL wrote:Pass the dam ball Melo
CANDIDATE: BEST IN-GAME POST OF THE SEASON
gunsnewing wrote:ahhh its so nice to be able to tell it like it is again without NYKMENTAL breathing down your neck. Very relaxing..
Unfettered somberism. It's like ice tea on a hot day near the pool, ain't it? You can pee on your team and nobody's there to make fun of your weenie.
misterearl wrote:Hello?Knicksfan wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love wins and Im a fan and all, but the starting lineups of people playing 3 minutes and that's all are just silly.Since when are starting lineups such cause for widespread panic?
The message is that the team belongs to everyone. Not any one man.
"You play to win the game"
"But you post on UK to show what true fun and intelligence it requires being a sad sack manic depressive Knick fan"
--> our .600 coach is a fuhhhhucking idiot.
--> our .600 players are mostly fuhhhhucking stupid.
--> our stupid idiotic fuhuuuuucking Knicks shouldn't have soiled their knuckles against this level of competition
Don't most of you drink? Why aren't you happier?
Thankfully, we didn't see many "didn't win this the right way" posts. I guess not having Melo or NYKMentality around puts most sombers to sleep earlier than usual...
Off to find the "Welcome back to 2nd place in the East" thread...
(The Woe is Us/ "why do we suck so bad?" bootleg tapes)
jrodmc wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Pass the dam ball MeloCANDIDATE: BEST IN-GAME POST OF THE SEASON
gunsnewing wrote:ahhh its so nice to be able to tell it like it is again without NYKMENTAL breathing down your neck. Very relaxing..
Unfettered somberism. It's like ice tea on a hot day near the pool, ain't it? You can pee on your team and nobody's there to make fun of your weenie.misterearl wrote:Hello?Knicksfan wrote:Don't get me wrong, I love wins and Im a fan and all, but the starting lineups of people playing 3 minutes and that's all are just silly.Since when are starting lineups such cause for widespread panic?
The message is that the team belongs to everyone. Not any one man.
"You play to win the game"
"But you post on UK to show what true fun and intelligence it requires being a sad sack manic depressive Knick fan"
--> our .600 coach is a fuhhhhucking idiot.
--> our .600 players are mostly fuhhhhucking stupid.
--> our stupid idiotic fuhuuuuucking Knicks shouldn't have soiled their knuckles against this level of competitionDon't most of you drink? Why aren't you happier?
Thankfully, we didn't see many "didn't win this the right way" posts. I guess not having Melo or NYKMentality around puts most sombers to sleep earlier than usual...
Off to find the "Welcome back to 2nd place in the East" thread...
Hilarious and on point.
(Pounding bass drum)
Beat OKC
Beat OKC!
JamesKPolk wrote:CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
Mike Woodson was swept out of the playoffs 2 years in a row with the Hawks.
And where we the Hawks as a franchise before Woody took over?
So you're attributing the entire Hawks turnaround to Mike Woodson and not the fact their roster greatly improved when he was named head coach?
Are you also forgetting Woodson's first 4 seasons with Atlanta were a combined 106-222?
Are you saying the acquisitions of Joe Johnson, Al Horford, Josh Smith, Mike Bibby and others to replace the likes of Alan Henderson, Dan Dickau and Shareef Abdur-Rahim had no impact on the Hawks fortunes?
Okay.
Only this forum can turn a painfully mediocre coach into an excellent one. I've already provided quotes on what Hawks fans think of the "genius" of Mike Woodson and they don't miss him at all.
I;m attributing the turnaround to Woody starting with the Hawks in straight rebuild mode taking the team to 3 straight playoff appereances while improving the win total every season he was there.
2004-2005 13-69
2005-2006 26-56 (+13)
2006-2007 30-52 (+4)
2007-2008 37-45 (+7)(lost in 1st round)
2008-2009 47-35 (+10)(lost second round)
2009-2010 53-29 (+6)(lost in second round)
55-29 .654 with the Knicks. The dude is clearly a bumb.
CashMoney wrote:JamesKPolk wrote:I don't care who is favored to win, 2 straight years swept out of the playoffs is awful.And Larry Drew hasn't done any worse than Woodson...which shows you Woodson's caliber as coach.
MDA wasn't a good coach but YOU brought up the record. There was a reason why his record was bad. Many factors that you failed to acknowledge. YOU tried to use the record as the end-all-be-all to an argument and failed. Yeah, I'm sure your original post was not in defense of Woodson. Yet you've spent the subsequent posts defending Woodson with strawman arguments.
If D'Antoni had the same team now he'd have a similar record. Because right now we're using D'Antoni's system. So I guess D'Antoni's much-maligned system is good now, right? It's a joke. This system wont win anything and a bunch of flip floppers are in here ranting and raving every day about how people disrespect Woodson and the Knicks. Look in the mirror! You're hypocrites!
Woodson improved the Hawks every season that he was there and he is a damn good coach. Drew hasn't done any worse but the Hawks aren't any worse than when Joe Johnson was the franchise.
PERSPECTIVE. We were swept once. We lost to the Heat in 5 last year! Awful sure, but not as awful as missing the playoffs for 10 freakin years! We were also banged up both years!
Saying If MDA had the same team that Woody has now we'd have a similar record is the same as saying that Woody could do the same for the Lakers. In fact Woody had the same team that MDA had and went 18-6.
Woodson's regular season achievements are simply overstated.
Woodson's arrival coincided with additions of Joe Johnson(free agent), Josh Childress, Josh Smith, Marvin Williams, Al Horford.....and while some of these players didn't leave up to their draft positions they were never bad players all Lottery Talent. I would hope your team improves from a Lottery vantage point especially if the team remains healthy for most of his tenure there.
Here's a couple reminder posts for the last time please Frame In The Family Dining Room...THANKS!
[
[
[
[
[
You gotta love how things are perceived when changes are made. Woody "father figure"?
Well let's see what the temperament was when "father Woody figure" was replaced by Larry Drew
"Woody has been here six years and had basically been the only voice that many of these players had heard," the GM said at the time. "The shelf life for coaches and management in the NBA is short, particularly for coaches, maybe two or three years. In Woody's case, he has gone six. The compelling thought for me was maybe it's right for a change."Sund believes a new coach might be able to take the Hawks to even higher levels, though he acknowledged it was a risk to dump someone coming off a playoff appearance.
"Sometimes in professional sports, change is good -- not only for the individual, but for the organization," he said. "Hey, it was a tough decision any way you go. If it doesn't turn out, it's the wrong decision. If it turns out, maybe it was the right decision, I don't know."
The hiring of Drew will surely be popular with the players, and the Hawks may be hoping that keeping a familiar face on the sideline will help them re-sign Johnson and smooth the transition for the rest of the roster.
and
The Hawks have decided to hire Larry Drew as their next head coach, people with knowledge of the decision said today.Drew was Atlanta’s lead assistant for six years under Mike Woodson, who was let go last month. Drew and the team are working out the details of a contract this evening and the official announcement of his hiring is expected on Saturday.
Drew, 52, emerged from a group of finalists that also included Avery Johnson, Dwane Casey and Mark Jackson. Once Johnson agreed to coach the Nets early in the week, that left Atlanta’s ownership group and GM Rick Sund to choose from among the other three candidates.
This will be Drew’s first head-coaching job after he’s been an NBA assistant for the the last 14 seasons. He worked for the Lakers, Wizards, Pistons and Nets before joining Woodson’s staff for the 2004-05 season. Drew played 714 games over 10 NBA seasons from 1980-91.
“He’s very experienced, just being around the game,” Hawks guard Jamal Crawford said. “He’s very knowledgeable. I think he is prepared for a lot of different situations.”
When Sund decided not to retain Woodson, he said the team needed “another voice” after the team lost in the second round of the playoffs the last two years. The Hawks apparently decided Drew will have a leadership style distinct from Woodson while also having the advantage of established relationships with players and familiarity with the team’s issues.
“He knows the faults of our teams,” Crawford said. “It’s not like we are a bad team. Now we can continue to build; we don’t have to start over.”
Drew inherits a team that won 53 games next season and, among its core players, has all but Joe Johnson under contract for next season. But he will face some challenges as the Hawks look to break through after getting swept in the second round of the playoffs in consecutive years.
Drew is popular among players but now his role changes from sometimes-confidant to the person in charge of their playing time and involvement in the offense. He also will have to reprimand players for their mistakes while trying to maintain relationships and team chemistry.
“Everything is going to be a first for him,” Crawford said. “But I think it will be a little bit easier transition because he knows our team. He doesn’t have to come in and learn the different personalities, what makes people tick and how to motivate them.”
When the Hawks let Woodson go, among the concerns expressed by players and management was what they considered Woodson’s differing levels of accountability. They said Woodson didn’t rebuke certain players as often as he did others, leading to some resentment in the locker room.
The Hawks also want to move away from an isolation-heavy offensive approach that was influenced by guard Joe Johnson’s playing style. Johnson is eligible to become a free agent next month, and the Hawks still want to re-sign him.
A person with knowledge of Johnson’s plans said he’s still open to returning. But the person said the new coach would have to sell Johnson on relying more on his teammates in the offense and ensure him that locker-room chemistry would improve.