Knicks · GAME THREAD: KNICKS @BULLS 8PM TNT (page 18)
AnubisADL wrote:Easy to explain the loss. Knicks are HEAVILY reliant on Melo for scoring. The other guys feed off him.13-34 is terrible considering he only scored 36 points.
LOL at JR Smith taking 27 shots to score 28 points.
.
Oh well on to the next.
i did not see the game except for two minutes but this statement is sheer nonsense.
judging from the box score i can see that the bulls' defense was such that it forced a chuckage and suckage from anthony and smith. felton took too many shots too.
the main takeaway from the advanced statistics is that the bulls succeeded in stifling the knicks' ball movement. you can tell from the ratio of usage to assist rate. melo's was a ridiculous reversion to "bad melo" where the ratio is 39.3:8.8 which reduces to 4.47:1 and that's with an abominable 46.9TS%. this means he did not move the ball and was forced into taking too many shots, bad shots.
you can't win ballgames against good defenses unless you stay disciplined and keep the ball moving ahead of the defenders.
tkf mentioned that the thing that concerns him most about the knicks is that the celtics have one thing the knicks don't: POISE.
at this point it is folly to claim that "the knicks are heavily reliant on melo" since it is clear that he actually brings this situation on himself. bryant has manifested the same tendencies against good defenses plenty of times.
dk7th wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Easy to explain the loss. Knicks are HEAVILY reliant on Melo for scoring. The other guys feed off him.13-34 is terrible considering he only scored 36 points.
LOL at JR Smith taking 27 shots to score 28 points.
Oh well on to the next.
i did not see the game except for two minutes but this statement is sheer nonsense.
judging from the box score i can see that the bulls' defense was such that it forced a chuckage and suckage from anthony and smith. felton took too many shots too.
the main takeaway from the advanced statistics is that the bulls succeeded in stifling the knicks' ball movement. you can tell from the ratio of usage to assist rate. melo's was a ridiculous reversion to "bad melo" where the ratio is 39.3:8.8 which reduces to 4.47:1 and that's with an abominable 46.9TS%. this means he did not move the ball and was forced into taking too many shots, bad shots.
you can't win ballgames against good defenses unless you stay disciplined and keep the ball moving ahead of the defenders.
tkf mentioned that the thing that concerns him most about the knicks is that the celtics have one thing the knicks don't: POISE.
at this point it is folly to claim that "the knicks are heavily reliant on melo" since it is clear that he actually brings this situation on himself. bryant has manifested the same tendencies against good defenses plenty of times.
LOL. Why bother posting?
Dude you never post after a win. Coincidence? I think not.
Smith and Melo played like trash and the game was STILL winnable. Spare me your "analysis".
dk7th wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Easy to explain the loss. Knicks are HEAVILY reliant on Melo for scoring. The other guys feed off him.13-34 is terrible considering he only scored 36 points.
LOL at JR Smith taking 27 shots to score 28 points.
Oh well on to the next.
i did not see the game except for two minutes but this statement is sheer nonsense.
judging from the box score i can see that the bulls' defense was such that it forced a chuckage and suckage from anthony and smith. felton took too many shots too.
the main takeaway from the advanced statistics is that the bulls succeeded in stifling the knicks' ball movement. you can tell from the ratio of usage to assist rate. melo's was a ridiculous reversion to "bad melo" where the ratio is 39.3:8.8 which reduces to 4.47:1 and that's with an abominable 46.9TS%. this means he did not move the ball and was forced into taking too many shots, bad shots.
you can't win ballgames against good defenses unless you stay disciplined and keep the ball moving ahead of the defenders.
tkf mentioned that the thing that concerns him most about the knicks is that the celtics have one thing the knicks don't: POISE.
at this point it is folly to claim that "the knicks are heavily reliant on melo" since it is clear that he actually brings this situation on himself. bryant has manifested the same tendencies against good defenses plenty of times.
Dude, you didnt watch the game (which seems like the norm for you as you only seem to watch the Numbers Matrix style) so why bother with an analysis?
dk7th wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Easy to explain the loss. Knicks are HEAVILY reliant on Melo for scoring. The other guys feed off him.13-34 is terrible considering he only scored 36 points.
LOL at JR Smith taking 27 shots to score 28 points.
Oh well on to the next.
i did not see the game except for two minutes but this statement is sheer nonsense.
judging from the box score i can see that the bulls' defense was such that it forced a chuckage and suckage from anthony and smith. felton took too many shots too.
the main takeaway from the advanced statistics is that the bulls succeeded in stifling the knicks' ball movement. you can tell from the ratio of usage to assist rate. melo's was a ridiculous reversion to "bad melo" where the ratio is 39.3:8.8 which reduces to 4.47:1 and that's with an abominable 46.9TS%. this means he did not move the ball and was forced into taking too many shots, bad shots.
you can't win ballgames against good defenses unless you stay disciplined and keep the ball moving ahead of the defenders.
tkf mentioned that the thing that concerns him most about the knicks is that the celtics have one thing the knicks don't: POISE.
at this point it is folly to claim that "the knicks are heavily reliant on melo" since it is clear that he actually brings this situation on himself. bryant has manifested the same tendencies against good defenses plenty of times.
Whether Melo brought the situation upon himself or not, that doesnt change the fact that they are still reliant on him.
AnubisADL wrote:dk7th wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Easy to explain the loss. Knicks are HEAVILY reliant on Melo for scoring. The other guys feed off him.13-34 is terrible considering he only scored 36 points.
LOL at JR Smith taking 27 shots to score 28 points.
Oh well on to the next.
i did not see the game except for two minutes but this statement is sheer nonsense.
judging from the box score i can see that the bulls' defense was such that it forced a chuckage and suckage from anthony and smith. felton took too many shots too.
the main takeaway from the advanced statistics is that the bulls succeeded in stifling the knicks' ball movement. you can tell from the ratio of usage to assist rate. melo's was a ridiculous reversion to "bad melo" where the ratio is 39.3:8.8 which reduces to 4.47:1 and that's with an abominable 46.9TS%. this means he did not move the ball and was forced into taking too many shots, bad shots.
you can't win ballgames against good defenses unless you stay disciplined and keep the ball moving ahead of the defenders.
tkf mentioned that the thing that concerns him most about the knicks is that the celtics have one thing the knicks don't: POISE.
at this point it is folly to claim that "the knicks are heavily reliant on melo" since it is clear that he actually brings this situation on himself. bryant has manifested the same tendencies against good defenses plenty of times.
LOL. Why bother posting?
Dude you never post after a win. Coincidence? I think not.
Smith and Melo played like trash and the game was STILL winnable. Spare me your "analysis".
i watched the game sunday-- one that mattered to me. posted during the game thread and afterwards.
i have watched most of the games and have posted win or lose. because i have watched most of the games i know the team and understand its strengths and weaknesses.
i dont need to see games at this point to understand what happened.
my statistical analysis backs up what the eyes see-- did they not?
tkf wrote:3G4G wrote:tkf wrote:3G4G wrote:LiL Nathan...seriously....DCDC in front of Novak?ROFL!!!
Then he had the nerve to do a Wayans Brother Pops.....BANG BANG BANG BANG....BANG!!!! DCDC going to their bench. Oh Crap was he showing out
LiL Nathan Was Nothing More Than A Complete Buffoonery Of Mockery Against Us Yesterday All The Way To a 4-0 Season Sweep
Since regular season results tend to determine things around these neck of the woods, should we meet them in the playoffs we have no shot of getting past them.
AND YOU CAN TAKE THIS "WITHOUT DERRICK ROSE GOING" TO THE BANK!!!!!!!!!dude that was hilarious....
Lol where were you jokers during the 13 game win streak! 