Knicks · with the 24th pick the NYK select (page 2)

knicks1248 wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:Would u guys do the trade with the Blazers to get the rights back for Kostas Papanikolaou. The Knicks offered a future 2nd but the Blazers want are 1st for a swap of the 39th pick and Pap. I might do it depending on who is on the board. Maybe we can get Colton Iverson at 39 with Pap get us 2 players that could help instead of 1. Boils down to if u think Pap is as good as the forwards we can get at 24.

The blazers don't want him, and he doesn't want the play there..Now there trying to rape us..

Besides that, I don't know enough about him to really make a decision

very good shooting numbers. Won the euro league rising stars award. He probably as good of shooter as Cope but with better rebounding skills.

yellowboy90 wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:Would u guys do the trade with the Blazers to get the rights back for Kostas Papanikolaou. The Knicks offered a future 2nd but the Blazers want are 1st for a swap of the 39th pick and Pap. I might do it depending on who is on the board. Maybe we can get Colton Iverson at 39 with Pap get us 2 players that could help instead of 1. Boils down to if u think Pap is as good as the forwards we can get at 24.

The blazers don't want him, and he doesn't want the play there..Now there trying to rape us..

Besides that, I don't know enough about him to really make a decision

very good shooting numbers. Won the euro league rising stars award. He probably as good of shooter as Cope but with better rebounding skills.

If he is close to as good of a shooter as Cope plus a better defender and rebounder then you get him no matter what because he is the starting SF next season.

BRIGGS wrote:

Jmpasq wrote:Would u guys do the trade with the Blazers to get the rights back for Kostas Papanikolaou. The Knicks offered a future 2nd but the Blazers want are 1st for a swap of the 39th pick and Pap. I might do it depending on who is on the board. Maybe we can get Colton Iverson at 39 with Pap get us 2 players that could help instead of 1. Boils down to if u think Pap is as good as the forwards we can get at 24.

Thats like saying I sold you my camaro for 5k and Id like to buy it back for 15k 4 months later. He doesnt even want to play for Portland--let them deal from weakness and NEVER panic move like the Knicks ALWAYS do. If we donmt get him life moves on. On principle alone I would NEVER do this.

i think they are getting the upper hand on that deal but not quite as much as u are saying. Its quite possible all the players I value at #24 are gone by then.We are getting the 39th pick and Paps rights,Not just Paps rights.

I only like Ricky Ledo, and Tony Mitchell, If they are gone then Ill think about it.

I like Jamaal Franklin's motor. The NBA season is long. Shumpert and Franklin in the backcourt.

They select 6'7 Reggie Bullock from the Univ of North Carolina Tarheels

playa2 wrote:They select 6'7 Reggie Bullock from the Univ of North Carolina Tarheels

Why? We already have Novak.

AnubisADL wrote:

playa2 wrote:They select 6'7 Reggie Bullock from the Univ of North Carolina Tarheels

Why? We already have Novak.

I barely know anything about college ball but I know that Bullock and Novack completely different players. You think they are similar?

martin wrote:

AnubisADL wrote:

playa2 wrote:They select 6'7 Reggie Bullock from the Univ of North Carolina Tarheels

Why? We already have Novak.

I barely know anything about college ball but I know that Bullock and Novack completely different players. You think they are similar?

I dont think they are similar. Im saying their role on this team would be similar.

Bullock cant put the ball on the floor. We have seen what happens when team run our shooters off their spots.

If we go guard I prefer someone who can shoot off the dribble.

AnubisADL wrote:

I like Jamaal Franklin's motor. The NBA season is long. Shumpert and Franklin in the backcourt.

You think this kid is going in the 1st rnd?

His foot speed is a little slow, and the highlight reel showed nothing from a defensive stand point, can't trust these you tube clips some times..especially the time i was so pump about AR and Tony Douglas..although I still feel anthony randolph has a lot of potential..I feel like he's going to be a late bloomer similar to jermaine Oneal..but if you base your scouting on you tube...smh..

AnubisADL wrote:

playa2 wrote:They select 6'7 Reggie Bullock from the Univ of North Carolina Tarheels

Why? We already have Novak.

Bullock unlike Novak drives to the basket and finishes and he plays defense

AnubisADL wrote:

Ha, looks like a taller version of Hubert Davis with his mechanics. I'd have no problem drafting him. At the very least, he can be as good as Danny Green.

If we are gonna lose Copeland and JR Smith this is a no brainer.

BigDaddyG wrote:Ha, looks like a taller version of Hubert Davis with his mechanics. I'd have no problem drafting him. At the very least, he can be as good as Danny Green.

You do realize Danny Green was a 2nd round pick to Cleveland and they dumped him soon after? You dont draft Danny Green with the 24th pick man.

playa2 wrote:If we are gonna lose Copeland and JR Smith this is a no brainer.

If we going to lose Copeland and JR Smith than you need someone who can dribble and create their own shot. Franklin and Ledo are solid ball handlers.

1:22 mark.

I didnt think Ledo was that athletic but he has decent hops.

AnubisADL wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:Ha, looks like a taller version of Hubert Davis with his mechanics. I'd have no problem drafting him. At the very least, he can be as good as Danny Green.

You do realize Danny Green was a 2nd round pick to Cleveland and they dumped him soon after? You dont draft Danny Green with the 24th pick man.

Reggie Bullock is no 2nd rd pick, he's a 1st rd pick

At 24, it is hard to find a player that will be able to help the team this year....or even next year. I like Shane Larkin, if he were to fall that far, or if we could trade up a couple of places to get him. Perhaps Ricky Ledo, he had a great workout, but has he matured enough to be a professional? If not, and we don't have our sights on someone mgmt really feels can help us now/soon, I'm for trading the 24th pick for a back-up veteran PG.

Forget about buying a 2nd round pick, unless we want to package it into a trade. I'd take signing a good, older FA vet over a 2nd round player any day.

With the 24th pick....Mike Muscala! We have NO draft pick in 2014. We have the very fragile big man corps of Chandler, Amar'e, Camby and maybe Jerome Jordan. We need to at least match the Pacers in size, if not surpass them. Muscala gives us a versatile 4/5 who can grow into either role as a PF or a center. If any of our bigs go down, he should be an adequate replacement. Ideally, we can scoop up a 2nd round pick and address another need (backup PG, wing defender) later in the draft. I also believe a serviceable player can be culled from the D-League or vet's minimum. BTW, when do the Knicks stop bleeding draft picks?

Sangfroid wrote:With the 24th pick....Mike Muscala! We have NO draft pick in 2014. We have the very fragile big man corps of Chandler, Amar'e, Camby and maybe Jerome Jordan. We need to at least match the Pacers in size, if not surpass them. Muscala gives us a versatile 4/5 who can grow into either role as a PF or a center. If any of our bigs go down, he should be an adequate replacement. Ideally, we can scoop up a 2nd round pick and address another need (backup PG, wing defender) later in the draft. I also believe a serviceable player can be culled from the D-League or vet's minimum. BTW, when do the Knicks stop bleeding draft picks?

If Muscala is as good as some you guys claim he should go way before we pick.

Dude must not be beasting in workouts.

So many bigs go bust it's not funny. Cole Aldrich, Jordan Hill, Thabeet.

Any big we get at 24 isn't likely to do much for us next year. As an NBA big you have to have the physical tools.

Ryan Anderson got traded to the Magic from the Nets and the Magic didnt want to pay him.

AnubisADL wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:Ha, looks like a taller version of Hubert Davis with his mechanics. I'd have no problem drafting him. At the very least, he can be as good as Danny Green.

You do realize Danny Green was a 2nd round pick to Cleveland and they dumped him soon after? You dont draft Danny Green with the 24th pick man.

I'm sorry, but I gonna hold off before I use Cleveland's management as a model for anything. With the 24th pick, I think you're lucky if you draft a guy who is a solid fit in your rotation. I'm confident Bullock can play in the league, which isn't something I can say about a lot of the other guys who might be available. I have no problem gambling on talents like Ledo and Archie Goodwin. But those guys aren't a guarantee to play more than three years. For every Kobe Bryant that hits, there are plenty of Deshawn Stevensons who don't pan out.