Off Topic · LAX AIRPORT SHOOTING (page 2)
NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:But what would be the end game? Your premise makes no sense.Chaos, another American revolution, people aren't giving up their guns . Falseflags are made to convince you all Americans are dangerous, so we need to take away their weapons. What have you guys been thinking ? Dictatorship ! George Bush signed into law that in the event of civil unrest in America , the President of the United States will have dictatorship rights. Soldiers from other nations are already on our soil, the UN will unleash them to crack heads on American soil and they can't wait to go into action finally on our soil .
Slash, what foreign soldiers are on our soil? What is their aim? How is it that they managed to go unreported without so much as a blimp?
I never said the American civilian would win.
Go do some research, you think the SAME EVIL clowns that own the media would tell YOU about it ?
In an age where technology has allowed us to do away with a middleman for news (via Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc.), I would imagine someone would've said something by now.
And if a revolt would easily be trampled, does it matter if the average citizen has a gun or not?
Ask Hitler that question. lol
People have said something and made it known, but people call them crazy, just like the media programmed them to think.
What the hell does Hitler have to do with this conversation? It makes no sense in the context of what we have been talking about.
And there have been plenty of other people in the "whistleblower camp" that have been completely full of shit. Exactly how many times was the world going to end according to religious zealot types? Like I said before, it seems like all you have done is traded one man's propaganda for another that is even more far-fetched.Didn't you know Hitler had the people volunteer to give up their guns ???
Dude, Hitler's forces took over all of Europe, most of Northern Africa and 2/3 of Russia before losing his first battle at Stalingrad. You think a few peashooters would've made a dent in that warmachine? You think a few handguns could stop the 21st century version of those weapons?
I'm talking about HITLERS OWN PEOPLE IN HIS OWN COUNTRY!
playa2 wrote:Yeah, he can't be questioned cause he was shot in the face. You know what this is about? News says they are considering the safety of TSA agents now may need to carry guns?I thought it was interesting how mainstream news kept saying he was the "first agent shot in the line of duty"as if a police officer?
So this all leads to TSA carrying guns at the airport?
Think about that one.
Anybody remember who else was shot and couldn't speak either ? Boston bomber!
Whatever happened to him?
WHY ALL THE FALSEFLAGS?:
They want to see how many people are believing everything that they see and hear from the mainstream media. It's called Conditioning,the more times you pass off these fake scenarios, the more the sheeple will believe it.
Just one question: Where's the footage of the actual shooting?
The airport has hundreds of cameras, especially at security check. You will never see it for a reason. LOL
From 1918-1920, with the defeat of Germany in World War I, the nation was forced to accept a series of devastating reparations after the signing the Treaty of Versailles. The defeated Weimar government agreed to payments it did not have the ability to pay that would eventually lead to the 1920s inflationary depression. The treaty signed had stipulations to disarm the government. Fearing instability to hold the state together in the depression, they adopted a sweeping series of gun confiscation legislation against the citizens before they completely disarmed their military. Intended to prevent a conflict between the states, Article 169 of the Treaty of Versailles explicitly targeted the state: "Within two months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, German arms, munitions, and war material, including anti-aircraft material, existing in Germany in excess of the quantities allowed, must be surrendered to the Governments of the Principal Allied and Associated Powers to be destroyed or rendered useless."[1]
In 1919, the German government passed the Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which declared that "all firearms, as well as all kinds of firearms ammunition, are to be surrendered immediately."[2] Under the regulations, anyone found in possession of a firearm or ammunition was subject to five years' imprisonment and a fine of 100,000 marks.
On August 7, 1920, Rising fears whether or not Germany could have rebellions prompted the government to enact a second gun-regulation law called the Law on the Disarmament of the People. It put into effect the provisions of the Versailles Treaty in regard to the limit on military-type weapons.
In 1928, after a near decade of hyperinflation destroyed the structural fabric of the society, a rapidly expanding three-way political divide between the conservatives, National Socialists, and Communists prompted the rapidly declining conservative majority to enact the Law on Firearms and Ammunition. This law relaxed gun restrictions and put into effect a strict firearm licensing scheme. Under this scheme, Germans could possess firearms, but they were required to have separate permits to do the following: own or sell firearms, carry firearms (including handguns), manufacture firearms, and professionally deal in firearms and ammunition. This law explicitly revoked the 1919 Regulations on Weapons Ownership, which had banned all firearms possession.
Stephen Halbrook writes about the German gun restriction laws in the 1919-1928 period, "Within a decade, Germany had gone from a brutal firearms seizure policy which, in times of unrest, entailed selective yet immediate execution for mere possession of a firearm, to a modern, comprehensive gun control law."[3]
The 1938 German Weapons Act[edit]
The 1938 German Weapons Act, the precursor of the current weapons law, superseded the 1928 law. As under the 1928 law, citizens were required to have a permit to carry a firearm and a separate permit to acquire a firearm. Furthermore, the law restricted ownership of firearms to "...persons whose trustworthiness is not in question and who can show a need for a (gun) permit." But under the new law:
Gun restriction laws applied only to handguns, not to long guns or ammunition. The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as was the possession of ammunition."[4]
The legal age at which guns could be purchased was lowered from 20 to 18.[5]
Permits were valid for three years, rather than one year.[5]
The groups of people who were exempt from the acquisition permit requirement expanded. Holders of annual hunting permits, government workers, and NSDAP members were no longer subject to gun ownership restrictions. Prior to the 1938 law, only officials of the central government, the states, and employees of the German Reichsbahn Railways were exempted.[4]
Jews were forbidden from the manufacturing or dealing of firearms and ammunition.[4]
Under both the 1928 and 1938 acts, gun manufacturers and dealers were required to maintain records with information about who purchased guns and the guns' serial numbers. These records were to be delivered to a police authority for inspection at the end of each year.
On November 11, 1938, the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, promulgated Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews living in those locations of the right to possess firearms or other weapons.[6][7]
playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:playa2 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:But what would be the end game? Your premise makes no sense.Chaos, another American revolution, people aren't giving up their guns . Falseflags are made to convince you all Americans are dangerous, so we need to take away their weapons. What have you guys been thinking ? Dictatorship ! George Bush signed into law that in the event of civil unrest in America , the President of the United States will have dictatorship rights. Soldiers from other nations are already on our soil, the UN will unleash them to crack heads on American soil and they can't wait to go into action finally on our soil .
Slash, what foreign soldiers are on our soil? What is their aim? How is it that they managed to go unreported without so much as a blimp?
I never said the American civilian would win.
Go do some research, you think the SAME EVIL clowns that own the media would tell YOU about it ?
In an age where technology has allowed us to do away with a middleman for news (via Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, etc.), I would imagine someone would've said something by now.
And if a revolt would easily be trampled, does it matter if the average citizen has a gun or not?
Ask Hitler that question. lol
People have said something and made it known, but people call them crazy, just like the media programmed them to think.
What the hell does Hitler have to do with this conversation? It makes no sense in the context of what we have been talking about.
And there have been plenty of other people in the "whistleblower camp" that have been completely full of shit. Exactly how many times was the world going to end according to religious zealot types? Like I said before, it seems like all you have done is traded one man's propaganda for another that is even more far-fetched.Didn't you know Hitler had the people volunteer to give up their guns ???
Dude, Hitler's forces took over all of Europe, most of Northern Africa and 2/3 of Russia before losing his first battle at Stalingrad. You think a few peashooters would've made a dent in that warmachine? You think a few handguns could stop the 21st century version of those weapons?
I'm talking about HITLERS OWN PEOPLE IN HIS OWN COUNTRY!
You think they could stop a military capable of doing that? Think!
Looks like the Gifford shooting, Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, Dorner, DC Naval yard, Capital Drill - Not much action and the only thing doing the Shooting was a DSLR
The legs of a real victim would have been repositioned on the wheel chair before moving surely. This closer view shows how unnatural the angle of the legs. The leg bending back @ 1:10
This drill has terrified millions. Americans are so gullible, so sad.
Lets take a closer look UK
1.) Look how far away the ambulances are. Why are they half a mile away from where people were killed (if anyone was). Look how far they wheel the dummy, the fire people had to point out where the ambulances were.
2.)Why didn't the ambulance take off after he was put in?
3.)I know for a fact they ALWAYS put a neckbrace on, no matter the type of injury!
Why didn't they put a neck brace on?
That video was taken during an airport drill. They use dummies in drills. Why is the media airing it as if it was taken the day of the actual shooting?