meloanyk wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Like pouring gasoline on a fire IMO. Might be a good idea, make things so embarrassing for Dolan that he starts making better hires.
Agree. Last thing the Knicks need is another headcase, time to get rid of them instead of add to the problem
I tend to agree on Bynum. Kind of a lose/lose with this guy, no? If we got him and say he managed to stay healthy & he put up decent numbers the rest of the way--off that, he'd want big money, money we don't have, money he shouldn't get. With his injury history and character issues, I don't know about any lengthy extension for this dude. That's a gamble. And then if he's not part of the future, what's the point? Sad but this guy's not what he once was -- are we championship caliber the moment he walks in the door? No. Plus he'll take time away from Aldrich and Tyler, 2 guys I feel we should be putting much more work into finding out more about. I'd pass. Plus, a move for a guy like this signals we're still going for it -- and what "it" means I don't even know anymore -- 35 wins and maybe the 8th seed? To get swept in the 1st round? Pass. Break it down and rebuild it the right way.
meloanyk wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Like pouring gasoline on a fire IMO. Might be a good idea, make things so embarrassing for Dolan that he starts making better hires.
Agree. Last thing the Knicks need is another headcase, time to get rid of them instead of add to the problem
Im not worried about adding Bynum for 40 games. Hes got more at stake then we do.
Sign Bynum.
During introductions make players get out of clown car when name is called.
Season saved.
In all seriousness I wouldn't say I would mind it, but to see a lineup with Bynum, Kenyon, MWP, JR, and Chris Smith on the floor all at the same time may make it worth it.
