Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
Obviously Melo. I didn't think it was serious enough to merit a poll. I imagine the voting will be about 40 to 1
Bonn1997 wrote:Obviously Melo. I didn't think it was serious enough to merit a poll. I imagine the voting will be about 40 to 1
I thought that it would be far closer because of the way the Sprewell connected to the fan base.
Maybe you are right and it will be a landslide. Lets see.
I can guess who the 1 would be if thats the case
Bonn1997 wrote:Obviously Melo. I didn't think it was serious enough to merit a poll. I imagine the voting will be about 40 to 1
Tkf and dk7th would say otherwise.
I don't believe that dk would say otherwise. I hope that I am not wrong.
As if discussing this wasn't dumb enough on the other thread. Now a poll smh
mreinman wrote:Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
if you feel it is carmelo then why the need for a poll.. it won't change how I feel or the fact that sprewell got the knicks to a finals... that he was a better defender and more dynamic player... but carry on...
gunsnewing wrote:As if discussing this wasn't dumb enough on the other thread. Now a poll smh
lol, you are right. The idea is beyond silly.
Are you the spree vote out of disgust?
tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
if you feel it is carmelo then why the need for a poll.. it won't change how I feel or the fact that sprewell got the knicks to a finals... that he was a better defender and more dynamic player... but carry on...
Just because I feel something, it does not mean that I am not interested how others feel.
I was really curious to see if others can possibly and logically feel this way.
Maybe others also feel that he was more "dynamic" and "diverse".
mreinman wrote:I don't believe that dk would say otherwise. I hope that I am not wrong.
Timeout. Is this actually being discussed in another thread? What's the title?
mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
if you feel it is carmelo then why the need for a poll.. it won't change how I feel or the fact that sprewell got the knicks to a finals... that he was a better defender and more dynamic player... but carry on...
Just because I feel something, it does not mean that I am not interested how others feel.
I was really curious to see if others can possibly and logically feel this way.
Maybe others also feel that he was more "dynamic" and "diverse".
you are just looking for validation. which tells me you cannot defend your argument on your own... I aksed you where was carmelo better, what made him a better player? all I have gotten from you is this ridiculous or as you put it.. preposterous poll...
NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:I don't believe that dk would say otherwise. I hope that I am not wrong.
Timeout. Is this actually being discussed in another thread? What's the title?
http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
If Phil keeps Melo I can assure you it will be at a number where we can build a winning team around him
tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
if you feel it is carmelo then why the need for a poll.. it won't change how I feel or the fact that sprewell got the knicks to a finals... that he was a better defender and more dynamic player... but carry on...
Just because I feel something, it does not mean that I am not interested how others feel.
I was really curious to see if others can possibly and logically feel this way.
Maybe others also feel that he was more "dynamic" and "diverse".
you are just looking for validation. which tells me you cannot defend your argument on your own... I aksed you where was carmelo better, what made him a better player? all I have gotten from you is this ridiculous or as you put it.. preposterous poll...
Yeah it is pretty preposterous.
Trying to explain/argue this (further) would be like teaching a horse to speak mandarin.
I think my argument in the other thread was very clear and unambiguous (at least I thought so)
TKF, no hard feelings as I've stated, everyone has a right to their opinion even if others believe that they are completely illogical.
gunsnewing wrote:If Phil keeps Melo I can assure you it will be at a number where we can build a winning team around him
Yes. That number will be very telling as to what a true basketball mind believes that he is worth.
He is a cash cow to the franchise. I hope that this does not play any roll but I fear that maybe it would.
I think he gets 15-18 if he stays but my gut tells me he plays for chicago next year.
mreinman wrote:NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:I don't believe that dk would say otherwise. I hope that I am not wrong.
Timeout. Is this actually being discussed in another thread? What's the title?
http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Dude, just don't bother. You could substitute Sprewell for Danny Devito and he'd argue that Devito would be the better ball player. I'm pretty sure he once suggested that Melo was better suited to be a bench player.
gunsnewing wrote:H20
LJ
Ewing
Camby
I loved watching all of these guys.. Houston was underrated if you ask me.. LJ was so much better than his numbers would suggest.... one of my favorite knicks of all time..
NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:I don't believe that dk would say otherwise. I hope that I am not wrong.
Timeout. Is this actually being discussed in another thread? What's the title?
http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Dude, just don't bother. You could substitute Sprewell for Danny Devito and he'd argue that Devito would be the better ball player. I'm pretty sure he once suggested that Melo was better suited to be a bench player.
It's funny you spend this much time telling him not to bother and then post some of the most useless drivel I have ever seen.. why not take your own advice?
mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:tkf wrote:mreinman wrote:Though Sprewell was more Likable and Melo is flawed, I say hands down its Melo.
if you feel it is carmelo then why the need for a poll.. it won't change how I feel or the fact that sprewell got the knicks to a finals... that he was a better defender and more dynamic player... but carry on...
Just because I feel something, it does not mean that I am not interested how others feel.
I was really curious to see if others can possibly and logically feel this way.
Maybe others also feel that he was more "dynamic" and "diverse".
you are just looking for validation. which tells me you cannot defend your argument on your own... I aksed you where was carmelo better, what made him a better player? all I have gotten from you is this ridiculous or as you put it.. preposterous poll...
Yeah it is pretty preposterous.
Trying to explain/argue this (further) would be like teaching a horse to speak mandarin.
I think my argument in the other thread was very clear and unambiguous (at least I thought so)
TKF, no hard feelings as I've stated, everyone has a right to their opinion even if others believe that they are completely illogical.
why is it so hard to answer my question.. I guess trying to get you to defend your argument logically isn't going to happen..
I guess I should look for that madarin speaking horse you are referring to, I am sure he can come up with something better than what you are offering..
I had you made from your very few post, your straw man arguments and your inability to defend your points..
creating polls and saying things like preposterous is not a legitimate defense..
tkf wrote:gunsnewing wrote:H20
LJ
Ewing
Camby
I loved watching all of these guys.. Houston was underrated if you ask me.. LJ was so much better than his numbers would suggest.... one of my favorite knicks of all time..
I liked LJ and Camby. Ewing personally rubbed me the wrong way for many reasons but was no doubt a GREAT player.
Houston IMHO was the most overrated and overpaid player that we ever had. I did love that shot that he hit to beat the heat.