UltimateKnicks.com

DJMUSIC @ 4/18/2014 10:41 PM

DJs NBA Playoff Predictions:

NBA EAST:
Pacers
Heat
Raptors
Bulls
Wizards
Nets
Bobcats
Hawks

Pacers(1) Over Hawks(8) in 6
Heat(2) Over Bobcats(7) in 5
Raptors(3) Over Nets(6) in 6
Bulls (4) over Wizards(5) in 6

SEMI's:
Bulls over Pacers in 7
Heat over Raptors in 5

Heat over Bulls in 6 (East Conf. champs 2014)

NBA WEST:
Spurs
Thunder
Clippers
Rockets
Blazers
Warriors
Mavs
Memphis

Spurs(1) over Grizzlies(8) in 6
Thunder(2) over Mavs(7) in 5
Clippers(3) over Warriors(6) in 5
Blazers(5) over Rockets(4) in 7

SEMI's:
Spurs over Blazers in 6
Thunder over Clippers in 7

Spurs over Thunder in 7 (West Conf. champs 2014)

Spurs over Heat in 6
SAS NBA 2014 champs

dk7th @ 4/19/2014 12:32 AM

DJMUSIC wrote:DJs NBA Playoff Predictions:
NBA EAST:
Pacers
Heat
Raptors
Bulls
Wizards
Nets
Bobcats
Hawks
Pacers(1) Over Hawks(8) in 6
Heat(2) Over Bobcats(7) in 5
Raptors(3) Over Nets(6) in 6
Bulls (4) over Wizards(5) in 6

SEMI's:
Bulls over Pacers in 7
Heat over Raptors in 5
Heat over Bulls in 6 (East Conf. champs 2014)
NBA WEST:
Spurs
Thunder
Clippers
Rockets
Blazers
Warriors
Mavs
Memphis
Spurs(1) over Grizzlies(8) in 6
Thunder(2) over Mavs(7) in 5
Clippers(3) over Warriors(6) in 5
Blazers(5) over Rockets(4) in 7
SEMI's:
Spurs over Blazers in 6
Thunder over Clippers in 7
Spurs over Thunder in 7 (West Conf. champs 2014)
Spurs over Heat in 6
SAS NBA 2014 champs

pacers over hawks in 5 or 6
heat sweep
nets over raptors in 5 or 6
bulls over wizards in 5 or 6

pacers over bulls in 6 or 7
heat and nets toss up in 7

pacers, heat, nets go to finals too tough to call

spurs over grizzlies in 5 or sweep
thunder over mavs in 5 or 6
clippers over warriors in 5 agree
rockets over blazers in 7 very tough call!

spurs over rockets in 5 or 6
thunder or clippers in seven toss up too tough to call

spurs over rockets in 5 or 6, spurs over clippers in 6, spurs over thunder in 6 or 7

spurs over heat or pacers in 6 or 7, nets in 5

spurs end their era on a winning note.

Dagger @ 4/19/2014 2:38 PM

Nets caught the city of Toronto with their pants down. I mean seriously the shot clock is not working- how embarassing.

holfresh @ 4/19/2014 4:02 PM

Paul Pierce showed you why you put the ball in the hands of a closer time and time again...

gunsnewing @ 4/19/2014 4:25 PM

holfresh wrote:Paul Pierce showed you why you put the ball in the hands of a closer time and time again...

Yup I engaged in many arguments that Pierce was far from done and this was why. He's as good as any great closer

dk7th @ 4/19/2014 4:30 PM

gunsnewing wrote:
holfresh wrote:Paul Pierce showed you why you put the ball in the hands of a closer time and time again...
Yup I engaged in many arguments that Pierce was far from done and this was why. He's as good as any great closer

he is the truth. kidd did a fantastic job keeping his older players fresh. pierce looked lean and mean out there. so clutch.

holfresh @ 4/19/2014 4:31 PM

How about DeRozan and Ross no shows in game one...The game show not have been that close. Lowry hit some big shots to keep it from getting away..

holfresh @ 4/19/2014 4:36 PM

I have to man up...I never thought Curry would be this good...I thought his frame was too slight..The rule changes where u can't touch wing players help outside play a lot...

yellowboy90 @ 4/19/2014 5:18 PM

Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.

gunsnewing @ 4/19/2014 5:21 PM

yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.

Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the vote of confidence from Phil

yellowboy90 @ 4/19/2014 5:27 PM

gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.
Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the heave of confidence from Phil

Redick is more of a two way player than Redick and one can only hope Hardaway gets to that point. Hopefully shump can turn it around.

yellowboy90 @ 4/19/2014 5:38 PM

Was woodson coaching the clips in the 3rd

yellowboy90 @ 4/19/2014 5:44 PM

I could see Amar'e finishing out his career like J O'neal. On a vet min deal or no more than 3M amar'e would be a great value player.

markvmc @ 4/19/2014 6:36 PM

yellowboy90 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.
Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the heave of confidence from Phil
Redick is more of a two way player than Redick and one can only hope Hardaway gets to that point. Hopefully shump can turn it around.

Strongly disagree.

Uptown @ 4/19/2014 8:01 PM

gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.
Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the vote of confidence from Phil

+1....I always hated the small lineup with Melo @ the 4 and 6'5 Shump @ SF. People wonder why Shump isn't as good now, as he was on the defensive end during his rookie year. Look no further than Woodson playing him @ SF. Can see Shump playing the Ron Harper role for us next year. Shump is better off playing the 2 and some 1 as opposed to play SF.....

Uptown @ 4/19/2014 8:03 PM

Inconsistent opening round of the playoffs for the Refs. Let some physical play go during the Nyets game, but called a ton of ticky-tack fouls during the Clips/Warriors game. Clips lost their major advantage because the refs werw a bit whistle happy....

holfresh @ 4/19/2014 8:05 PM

I always think it important to have players who can help create stops in the playoffs ...Shump is one of those guys..

gunsnewing @ 4/19/2014 8:06 PM

Uptown wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.
Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the vote of confidence from Phil

+1....I always hated the small lineup with Melo @ the 4 and 6'5 Shump @ SF. People wonder why Shump isn't as good now, as he was on the defensive end during his rookie year. Look no further than Woodson playing him @ SF. Can see Shump playing the Ron Harper role for us next year. Shump is better off playing the 2 and some 1 as opposed to play SF.....

Exactly look at his perimeter D when Woodless finally put him back at the 2 albeit off the bench

gunsnewing @ 4/19/2014 8:08 PM

holfresh wrote:I always think it important to have players who can help create stops in the playoffs ...Shump is one of those guys..

Exactly. I've always said whatever he gives you offensively is a bonus. Although he has shown great flashes. I expect Phil and coach to build up his confidence big time

mreinman @ 4/19/2014 9:36 PM

Pacers look awful

Atlanta looks so well coached.

holfresh @ 4/19/2014 9:39 PM

mreinman wrote:Pacers look awful
Atlanta looks so well coached.

Hang on..ATL is well coached??..How many one on one plays u see them run??..U killed Woody for ISO ...

Page 2 of 77

Back to Knicks Forum

Knicks · Official 2013/14 Playoff Thread (page 2)