the pacers are mentally weak but they are young. chalk it up to growing pains but they must tweak their roster. george hill seems merely adequate and expendable, stephenson may be gone.
CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
pacers still got this i think maybe
yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
scola got that experience
yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
IronWillGiroud wrote:pacers still got this i think maybe
lol
I would mind seeing OKC go down as well..I wanna see some good teams makes some panic trades in the offseason..
Ouch! Heat fans chanting overrated for Paul George.
CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
is that really what happened
Hibbert will lose the weight in the off season and claim his troubles on gaining too much muscle during the previous off season.
CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
I don't think the Walsh guys even played that much under Vogel and Cope was acquired under Bird's watch.
dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
is that really what happened
Not sure. That was why I said maybe. Maybe Vogel saw the same deficiencies in practice that Woodson saw. Not really sure. Collins did say Cope was a part of the Pacers plans until Scola was acquired.
yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
I don't think the Walsh guys even played that much under Vogel and Cope was acquired under Bird's watch.
I was under the impression that Vogel was a big fan of Cope.
CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
is that really what happened
Not sure. That was why I said maybe. Maybe Vogel saw the same deficiencies in practice that Woodson saw. Not really sure. Collins did say Cope was a part of the Pacers plans until Scola was acquired.
Well neither Scola or Cope plays d, so why not go with the more efficient shooter?
Holy shit George Hill is bad. Even Felton can make a nice pass once in a while, this dude sucks asssssholes.
Vogel is trash. Miami playing with mis-matches all series, and this garbage ass coach doesn't utilize them. I guess he comes from the same school of thought as "The East is biiiigggg, mannn".
The guys out West playing Chess, compared to this. Down two games, Brooks throws Reggie in, wins next game two. Pops says oh yeah, here's Matt Fucking Bonner in the starting lineup and Diaw after him, your move...wins game, now it's Brooks turn again.
Scola helped them a lot in the earlier rounds..He provided a spark off the bench and kept them competitive in a few games..
yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
is that really what happened
Not sure. That was why I said maybe. Maybe Vogel saw the same deficiencies in practice that Woodson saw. Not really sure. Collins did say Cope was a part of the Pacers plans until Scola was acquired.
Well neither Scola or Cope plays d, so why not go with the more efficient shooter?
Do you think hill could fill the role intended for cope?
IF you are Indy would you try to do a S&T with Houston for Parsons? I mean I would keep Lance but Parsons is a shooter. Houston gets an all around guy that will play better D against wings.
CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:The Pacers really have had problems scoring throughout the playoffs. How many times have they scored under 40 pts in the 1st half?They need to try to pawn off Hill and Hibbert but those two contracts might be too big to get some takers. I guess Solomon Hill improvement will be key and maybe they buyout Scola and Copelands contract then use the mid-level and whatever else they have to get some key rotational pieces.
Scola trade was a terrible trade.
Collins was saying the other night that the pacers got cope to compliment George but abandoned that strategy when they got Scola.
Vogel is not as smart as he gets credit for it seems. Why would you play Scola over Cope?
Cope may have been Vogel's guy and Scola bird's guy. Bird cleared out the guys Walsh got during bird's 1 year hiatus.
is that really what happened
Not sure. That was why I said maybe. Maybe Vogel saw the same deficiencies in practice that Woodson saw. Not really sure. Collins did say Cope was a part of the Pacers plans until Scola was acquired.
Well neither Scola or Cope plays d, so why not go with the more efficient shooter?
Do you think hill could fill the role intended for cope?
Solomon Hill? I am not sure, most people thought they reached to get Hill and it doesn't look like they gave him that much playing time.
CrushAlot wrote:Ouch! Heat fans chanting overrated for Paul George.
Were they lying? lol...Talented dude but regressed this season and definitely in these playoffs. D.West carried the Pacers this year.
Pacers are stuck...they need a point guard but they have no money to get one via free agency. The other question is, what do you do with L.Stephenson? All world talent and seems to be a head case....This is their J.R. Smith...do they pay him or let him go? If you let him go, who do you replace him with?
Interesting to see what they do this off season....
