You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
I think they can do 10-72
It would be a complete reversal of Phil's 95-96 Bulls
Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
Heres a question for your question......Does it matter?
If we don't get the top pick, every Knick fan on this board (not including me) will point to meaningless wins that Melo got us, on a torn knee.
So at this point, it doesn't matter.....Somebody will find something to complain about.
blkexec wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
Heres a question for your question......Does it matter?
If we don't get the top pick, every Knick fan on this board (not including me) will point to meaningless wins that Melo got us, on a torn knee.
So at this point, it doesn't matter.....Somebody will find something to complain about.
The healthiest thing to do is probably take a step back and find some humor in a team that could lose 30 games in a row
blkexec wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
Heres a question for your question......Does it matter?
If we don't get the top pick, every Knick fan on this board (not including me) will point to meaningless wins that Melo got us, on a torn knee.
So at this point, it doesn't matter.....Somebody will find something to complain about.
yea... you already have a few gearing up for the I told you sos. Sigh
Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
That would be good for the team
BRIGGS wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
That would be good for the team
I wasn't making an argument about whether it was good or bad. I was posing the question of whether this team will ever beat another NBA team in a game.
Probably 15 wins is safe.
BRIGGS wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
That would be good for the team
Actually, if we win every single game for the rest of the season....And get the #1 pick.....that would be good for the team.
blkexec wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
That would be good for the team
Actually, if we win every single game for the rest of the season....And get the #1 pick.....that would be good for the team.
^ This right here. As a fan I want to see my team play to win, see the players, coaching staff and front office improve, and go into the offseason with some semblance of on-court success besides the random bounce of ping pong balls.
If Lance Thomas blows up and becomes a bona fide superstar, we could make some noise the rest of the season.
Two more games. 12-70
DrAlphaeus wrote:blkexec wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:You'd think we'd have to win a few games but I'm not sure. I've been wondering if we're going to finish 10-72!
That would be good for the team
Actually, if we win every single game for the rest of the season....And get the #1 pick.....that would be good for the team.
^ This right here. As a fan I want to see my team play to win, see the players, coaching staff and front office improve, and go into the offseason with some semblance of on-court success besides the random bounce of ping pong balls.
What do you mean by get the #1 pick (blkexec)? How could that happen if we win all these games?
We still have games against the TWolves, Lakers and 76ers twice. We'll win some, if not all of those, not because we're better, but because they are also trying to tank and I think they will be more ruthless at tanking than we will be when the chips are down.
Truthfully we are probably better off not having the worst record since the worst record rarely wins lottery. On the flipside knowing our luck we will end up second to last and the last place team will win the lottery lol
Praying for 10-72!
Go NY, go NY, GOOOOOO!
I'm not entirely sure we won't find a way to have some of our 10 wins rescinded.
smackeddog wrote:We still have games against the TWolves, Lakers and 76ers twice. We'll win some, if not all of those, not because we're better, but because they are also trying to tank and I think they will be more ruthless at tanking than we will be when the chips are down.
Might end up being like that girl's BB game the other day, where both were trying to lose to stay away from the best team in their state in the playoffs.
My understanding is that Jackson has signed Chris Dudley to work on jump shot and foul shot technique with the Knicks for the rest of the year.
I'm confident they will find a way to make it -10 and 92
I cant see this group winning more than 3 more games. No team is putting a worse roster on the floor.
I see 13-69.
Then what?
Miss out and fall to #6 in the lottery.
Pick a soft Euro with that pick who fails to make the team.
Starphuck in free agency and overpay for less than top talent.
That player blows out a knee in preseason after reporting to camp out of shape and his career is cooked.
Trade the next future #1 that is eligible to be traded for someone that nobody wants.
That player joins Bargs on the unemployment line in mid season.
It's the Knick way!
markvmc wrote:I'm not entirely sure we won't find a way to have some of our 10 wins rescinded.
Well, there is the new NBA Suck Clause that allows the commissioner to subtract from your win total if you really, really suck. Such actions are usually preceded by being removed from national TV broadcast schedules.
