nyk4ever wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:in the words of immortal chris jericho.. would you please. SHUT. THE HELL. UP!what the fuck did you want fisher to do? the team was full of dleague players and guys that had no business playing in the league so it's not like he could take good players off the floor for bad ones, THE WHOLE TEAM WAS BAD. did you want him to tell the team to turn the ball over on purpose? tell them to shoot the ball in the wrong hoop? wake the fuck up and get a fucking clue.
answer this...
were we the only team to move down from our odds position?
answer this...
what did you want fisher to do to stop the team from winning games?
I was actually surprised he was trying to win games..Wasn't the impression I got all season..
nyk4ever wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:in the words of immortal chris jericho.. would you please. SHUT. THE HELL. UP!what the fuck did you want fisher to do? the team was full of dleague players and guys that had no business playing in the league so it's not like he could take good players off the floor for bad ones, THE WHOLE TEAM WAS BAD. did you want him to tell the team to turn the ball over on purpose? tell them to shoot the ball in the wrong hoop? wake the fuck up and get a fucking clue.
answer this...
were we the only team to move down from our odds position?
answer this...
what did you want fisher to do to stop the team from winning games?
answer this...
does pride come before the fall... from 2 to 4?
you still haven't answered the question. what did you want fisher to do to ensure that the team lost games?
He should have pulled Langston or THJ off the court
This team could easily go to 63 wins with a little luck
because langston and thjr are good players? whoever he replaced them with are players of equal talent, so wouldnt have done anything
nyk4ever wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:Cartman718 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:in the words of immortal chris jericho.. would you please. SHUT. THE HELL. UP!what the fuck did you want fisher to do? the team was full of dleague players and guys that had no business playing in the league so it's not like he could take good players off the floor for bad ones, THE WHOLE TEAM WAS BAD. did you want him to tell the team to turn the ball over on purpose? tell them to shoot the ball in the wrong hoop? wake the fuck up and get a fucking clue.
answer this...
were we the only team to move down from our odds position?
answer this...
what did you want fisher to do to stop the team from winning games?
answer this...
does pride come before the fall... from 2 to 4?
you still haven't answered the question. what did you want fisher to do to ensure that the team lost games?
run the damn triangle!
nyk4ever wrote:because langston and thjr are good players? whoever he replaced them with are players of equal talent, so wouldnt have done anything
Come on dude; not tonight.
Knicks1969 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:because langston and thjr are good players? whoever he replaced them with are players of equal talent, so wouldnt have done anything
Come on dude; not tonight.
whoever was playing well for the first 3 quarters... don't play them. what's the equal talent argument all about... this is about odds. play the fucking odds!!!
I think they won those games on purpose. I believe Phil and dumb Fisher wanted to help the lakers out
MS wrote:This team could easily go to 63 wins with a little luck
I agree. It might take 4 years to get to win # 63 though.
markvmc wrote:MS wrote:This team could easily go to 63 wins with a little luck
I agree. It might take 4 years to get to win # 63 though.
Judging by our record this year, it might take three years:::)))
I would disagree but it's just so hard to swallow that the worst team got the top pick this year and we were in that position if not for fishers stupidity. It's painful to think about.
Dagger wrote:I would disagree but it's just so hard to swallow that the worst team got the top pick this year and we were in that position if not for fishers stupidity. It's painful to think about.
Precisely......
Knicks1969 wrote:markvmc wrote:MS wrote:This team could easily go to 63 wins with a little luck
I agree. It might take 4 years to get to win # 63 though.
Judging by our record this year, it might take three years:::)))
Only if we're starting from the 17 we got last year!
ive supported uncle fish all yr long. he's had nothing to work with...but winning those last 2 games hurt
From no.#2 pick to Knick fool whom is Coach 15-67!
Terrible coaching, and terrible decision making
I dont understand the back lash on fisher. Coaches coach to win....players play to win.
GMs on the other hand have the real control to shut players down. Especially galo and THj since phil already saw what they can do.
GMs are in the high seat with big picture strategic thinking.....making moves thats best for the organization. Fisher has been trying to win games all season. Hes not going to change because hes the coach and thats his job. The GM on the otherhand.....makes moves thats best for the organization.
blkexec wrote:I dont understand the back lash on fisher. Coaches coach to win....players play to win.GMs on the other hand have the real control to shut players down. Especially galo and THj since phil already saw what they can do.
GMs are in the high seat with big picture strategic thinking.....making moves thats best for the organization. Fisher has been trying to win games all season. Hes not going to change because hes the coach and thats his job. The GM on the otherhand.....
Coaches coach to win?..Remember LB starting guys in their home town.
holfresh wrote:blkexec wrote:I dont understand the back lash on fisher. Coaches coach to win....players play to win.GMs on the other hand have the real control to shut players down. Especially galo and THj since phil already saw what they can do.
GMs are in the high seat with big picture strategic thinking.....making moves thats best for the organization. Fisher has been trying to win games all season. Hes not going to change because hes the coach and thats his job. The GM on the otherhand.....
Coaches coach to win?..Remember LB starting guys in their home town.
He was still coaching the game to win....regardless whos on the floor. The GM shouldve limited the players fisher had to play.
As a coach, I would love the opportunity to coach a young big like Towns. Fisher'srookie blunder will cause a lot of pain to this franchise for years to come.
Knicks1969 wrote:As a coach, I would love the opportunity to coach a young big like Towns. Fisher'srookie blunder will cause a lot of pain to this franchise for years to come.
its not on fisher its really on phil jackson. He is driving this Herbie
