callmened wrote:BRIGGS - i need your help bro...i on the ledge. what do we do? were u high on winslow? i know u like kaminsky
Ah life goes on
As long as Phil doesn't try to outthink himself, we might be better at 4 than 1 or 2.
I think everyone needs to calm down. Go get a big in FA and draft Mudiay, Russell or the best option at SG.
well i think
1. towns - minny
2. okafor - lakers
3. russell - 76ers
i think the best available after that is winslow, mudiay
To me, Mudiay is a better prospect than Winslow. You have to take him at 4, if Russell isn't available, which he wont.
codeunknown wrote:To me, Mudiay is a better prospect than Winslow. You have to take him at 4, if Russell isn't available, which he wont.
if this were 2005 then maybe
mreinman wrote:codeunknown wrote:To me, Mudiay is a better prospect than Winslow. You have to take him at 4, if Russell isn't available, which he wont.
if this were 2005 then maybe
You think 9 year old mudiay was better than winslow?
anrst wrote:is winslow even an nba player? an undersized 4?
He's tweener right now, but I think he transitions to a wing. He played a lot of power forward for Duke, which created a lot of mismatches. He kind of reminds of Quentin Richardson who also had to play power forward for Depaul before transitioning to an NBA wing. Q-Rich was a good athlete before the back injury. I read on one of the draft sites that Winslow's measurements are nearly identical to Lance Stephenson, so that should give you an idea of how Winslow compares to other players size wise.
The Knicks will probably next use draft pick and cap space together in a trade i.e trade Portland our pick in a S+T for Aldridge. If you believe the Knicks are run by Dolan you must believe this is step 2.
Haha Worjonoski is already saying the Knicks pick is very avaliable.
i can only assume a trade is coming
BRIGGS wrote:One problem is some of our trades down scenarios were best formed with the Sixers and LA. Really everything that could go wrong did.Id try to trade down to the Nuggets @7 for our 2016 pick back and take Frank kamnisky @ 7.
We can't even do that- we double traded the pick, so Denver have the right to swap places BUT then the Raptors have the right to that swapped pick- so essentially we would have to trade two assets (one to Denver, one to Toronto), just to get next years pick back. But hey- at least we got Bargs!
mreinman wrote:codeunknown wrote:To me, Mudiay is a better prospect than Winslow. You have to take him at 4, if Russell isn't available, which he wont.
if this were 2005 then maybe
I don't know- John Wall has been thriving, despite being essentially a time traveller from 2005
smackeddog wrote:BRIGGS wrote:One problem is some of our trades down scenarios were best formed with the Sixers and LA. Really everything that could go wrong did.Id try to trade down to the Nuggets @7 for our 2016 pick back and take Frank kamnisky @ 7.
We can't even do that- we double traded the pick, so Denver have the right to swap places BUT then the Raptors have the right to that swapped pick- so essentially we would have to trade two assets (one to Denver, one to Toronto), just to get next years pick back. But hey- at least we got Bargs!
Right.
smackeddog wrote:mreinman wrote:codeunknown wrote:To me, Mudiay is a better prospect than Winslow. You have to take him at 4, if Russell isn't available, which he wont.
if this were 2005 then maybe
I don't know- John Wall has been thriving, despite being essentially a time traveller from 2005
yes ... and very few expected him to turn it around. Many thought he would just be another tyreke.
the Knicks are getting Mudiay. 76ers are in love with Russell... We know it's Towns/Okafor at the top.
SupremeCommander wrote:the Knicks are getting Mudiay. 76ers are in love with Russell... We know it's Towns/Okafor at the top.
This looks set in stone. Towns is a great fit next to Pekovic. Lakers build another dynasty around OK4. Phili covets Russell. That leaves Mud or the best of the rest for the Knicks. They only wrinkle would be if the Wolves or Lakers are so enamored with Russell they take him. Then does Phili take Mudiay or do they add Towns/OK4 to a frontcourt with Embiid/Noels when they have no guards? Ill see it when I believe it... cant really fathom OK/Towns/DR not going 1-3. Stranger things have happened...
philly would still pick one of okafor or towns if they were available and then extort the knicks in exchange for mudiay
Cartman718 wrote:philly would still pick one of okafor or towns if they were available and then extort the knicks in exchange for mudiay
why would philly go for mudiay?
they want a guard who is a top shooter especially from 3?
mreinman wrote:Cartman718 wrote:philly would still pick one of okafor or towns if they were available and then extort the knicks in exchange for mudiay
why would philly go for mudiay?
they want a guard who is a top shooter especially from 3?
i thought they just want a distributor, which this kid is.
