..and his new username is fwk00. The guy has the same douchy, know-it-all attitude and writing style. He's trying to stay low key but it's only a matter of time before he outs himself like he did with the BryBry sig.
why do u care? use the ignore button? lets not make this another one of "those" threads
I don't think so. That guy has a blog and it is all positive. It appears his blog has been around for awhile.
I normally wouldn't but I find his first exit to be humorous. The environment here was supposedly so toxic that he needed to leave....and now he finds himself having to create new usernames to save face. Guess nixluva, myself and several others were not so bad after all.
CrushAlot wrote:I don't think so. That guy has a blog and it is all positive. It appears his blog has been around for awhile.
How do you know?
nard, you are way off base ... again
NardDogNation wrote:CrushAlot wrote:I don't think so. That guy has a blog and it is all positive. It appears his blog has been around for awhile.
How do you know?
He posted a link to his blog when he first posted here. He is a glass half full guy generally.
mreinman wrote:nard, you are way off base ... again
Sorry if I offended you and your BFF.
NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:nard, you are way off base ... again
Sorry if I offended you and your BFF.
I could care less but like some of your scenarios, you are way off base.
If you thought for a second that it was splat then it just shows that you do not have any idea of how to connect dots. sorry.
CrushAlot wrote:NardDogNation wrote:CrushAlot wrote:I don't think so. That guy has a blog and it is all positive. It appears his blog has been around for awhile.
How do you know?
He posted a link to his blog when he first posted here. He is a glass half full guy generally.
Would you happen to know, which the thread he/she did so?
If I recall correctly, Splat was not necessarily a pessimist; he only assumed that position when arguing with nixluva who is always optimistic. What sent up a redflag for me about fwk00 is how quick he was/is to insult as a newbie on the board (if he even is a newbie). Generally speaking, guys are more tempered with their responses early on before developing a rapport with others. The only other examples that I could think of that broke the mold was Splat....and ultimately Bry, which is how many came to the determination that they were one in the same. I could be wrong about fwk00 but his tone seemed to be an awful lot like our dear friend Splat.
mreinman wrote:NardDogNation wrote:mreinman wrote:nard, you are way off base ... again
Sorry if I offended you and your BFF.
I could care less but like some of your scenarios, you are way off base.
If you thought for a second that it was splat then it just shows that you do not have any idea of how to connect dots. sorry.
No advanced stats this time? Maybe you could use them again to "prove" how Jose Calderon was going to improve our team.
NardDogNation wrote:CrushAlot wrote:NardDogNation wrote:CrushAlot wrote:I don't think so. That guy has a blog and it is all positive. It appears his blog has been around for awhile.
How do you know?
He posted a link to his blog when he first posted here. He is a glass half full guy generally.
Would you happen to know, which the thread he/she did so?
If I recall correctly, Splat was not necessarily a pessimist; he only assumed that position when arguing with nixluva who is always optimistic. What sent up a redflag for me about fwk00 is how quick he was/is to insult as a newbie on the board (if he even is a newbie). Generally speaking, guys are more tempered with their responses early on before developing a rapport with others. The only other examples that I could think of that broke the mold was Splat....and ultimately Bry, which is how many came to the determination that they were one in the same. I could be wrong about fwk00 but his tone seemed to be an awful lot like our dear friend Splat.
lets see if fwk plays the drama queen ....
This is stupid and beyond petulant. Is there really any need to make a thread about a suspicious theory you have that a past poster is among us?
