Knicks · Should We Look Into Carlos Boozer at the Minimum? (page 2)

I'd be fine with a little Boozer. Rounding out the roster with vets at the minimum is how you squeeze out a few extra wins and we desperately need that.

TPercy wrote:

Cartman718 wrote:

TPercy wrote:

dk7th wrote:

TPercy wrote:

dk7th wrote:boozer is a bum

Would you rather have Derrick Williams?

don't know him but the way people are talking about him he also sounds like a bum

Except the other bum puts up excedingly better numbers than the latter..

i prefer bums that have potential compared to ones that can never be worked into shape

The latter bum has been in the league for almost 3 yesrs, is softer than your childhood teddy bear, and hasn't displayed any decent skill at an Nba level.

Derrick Williams is already signed..Why exacerbate the problem by adding another "Bum"? We've supposedly moved past throwing money at the problem...Thats an Isiah move: See signing Jerome James and adding Eddy Curry on top of that...Say no to Boozer....

Uptown wrote:

TPercy wrote:

Cartman718 wrote:

TPercy wrote:

dk7th wrote:

TPercy wrote:

dk7th wrote:boozer is a bum

Would you rather have Derrick Williams?

don't know him but the way people are talking about him he also sounds like a bum

Except the other bum puts up excedingly better numbers than the latter..

i prefer bums that have potential compared to ones that can never be worked into shape

The latter bum has been in the league for almost 3 yesrs, is softer than your childhood teddy bear, and hasn't displayed any decent skill at an Nba level.

Derrick Williams is already signed..Why exacerbate the problem by adding another "Bum"? We've supposedly moved past throwing money at the problem...Thats an Isiah move: See signing Jerome James and adding Eddy Curry on top of that...Say no to Boozer....

I'm not saying we sign him. I'm definitely against that at this point. I'm just pointing out that in hindsight right now, Boozer would definitely have been the better option.