Sasha giveth and taketh away.
Was that the best the Kurt could draw up there following a timeout...a quick, rushed Sasha 3?!? He is such a douche.
SocraticBallin22 wrote:Was that the best the Kurt could draw up there...a quick, rushed Sasha 3?!? He is such a douche.
I'm not sure that is anything a coach would draw up. Just Sasha being Sasha.
AA tryin to make up for his bad D.
SocraticBallin22 wrote:AA out of bounds?
If he was, this game is over.
Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
Side Note: Has KP become a NYC pickup artist with that blazer and belt buckle? LMAO
SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
Sucks. We played well enough to win this game--especially defensively. Sasha took some really bad shots in crunch time and shot us out of it. George hit a superstar shot and the refs helped the Pacers a little bit.
nixluva wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
But aren't they supposed to only review if it's a 3 or not? Why are they reviewing if he was out of bounds? Can they even do that if they don't call it on the floor?
SocraticBallin22 wrote:nixluva wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
But aren't they supposed to only review if it's a 3 or not? Why are they reviewing if he was out of bounds? Can they even do that if they don't call it on the floor?
I didn't think they could. Unless they initially called it out of bounds.
League must want Hickory High in the playoffs.
BTW...our defense the last 2 games:
--Held the Nets to 36% shooting and 91 points
---Held Pacers to 42% shooting and 92 points
two straight games holding opponent under 100 points.
I cannot emphasize enough how much of a difference it makes when we don't have a pg on the floor who gets beat off the dribble on every play
crzymdups wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:nixluva wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
But aren't they supposed to only review if it's a 3 or not? Why are they reviewing if he was out of bounds? Can they even do that if they don't call it on the floor?
I didn't think they could. Unless they initially called it out of bounds.
League must want Hickory High in the playoffs.
It will be in the ref report tomorrow.
CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:nixluva wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
But aren't they supposed to only review if it's a 3 or not? Why are they reviewing if he was out of bounds? Can they even do that if they don't call it on the floor?
I didn't think they could. Unless they initially called it out of bounds.
League must want Hickory High in the playoffs.
It will be in the ref report tomorrow.
http://official.nba.com/wp-content/uploa...
It was some BS.
crzymdups wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:nixluva wrote:SocraticBallin22 wrote:Why would the refs call that? Are you kidding me? You're supposed to review if that was a 3 or not, not if he was out of bounds? Really? Helping the Pacers. SMH.
That's one where you just swallow the whistle. I mean COME ON!!!
But aren't they supposed to only review if it's a 3 or not? Why are they reviewing if he was out of bounds? Can they even do that if they don't call it on the floor?
I didn't think they could. Unless they initially called it out of bounds.
League must want Hickory High in the playoffs.
It will be in the ref report tomorrow.
http://official.nba.com/wp-content/uploa...
It was some BS.
I am not sure what to make of it so I emailed them about it like they suggest just to be a pain in the @ss. If I get a response I will post it.
With the game tied and 30 seconds remaining, Ian Mahinmi got away with an illegal screen on Arron Afflalo. NBA:Mahinmi (IND) continues moving and extends his hip as he sets the screen on Afflalo (NYK) without giving him room to avoid the contact.
After the uncalled offensive foul, Paul George hit the go-ahead jumper. The Knicks missed on the other end, and they had to begin intentionally fouling. The Pacers added a few free throws in their 92-87 win.
A correct call would’ve turned the ball over, giving New York a chance to go ahead. If the Knicks ran the clock down before shooting, as they should’ve, even a miss would’ve allowed only a rushed Indiana possession.
The loss means little to the Knicks, who are out of the playoff race and already traded their first-round pick.
But, for the Pacers, every win – and every call – helps.
http://nba.nbcsports.com/2016/04/05/nba-...
