earthmansurfer wrote:Knickoftime wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:holfresh wrote:FBI probing new Hillary Clinton emails...
What took them so long?
From what I gathered reading this forum, it appears Clinton and secret world bank illuminati has allowed or directed the FBI to do this.
Good point but at least no "laws" were broken. Hillary is a regular Alice Capone. 
You realize she breaks the law and kids in 3rd world countries get funding for food and pharmaceuticals. But you call her Al Capone. You have to work so hard to criminalize her. Your effort is noted.
meloshouldgo wrote:Please do not try to humanize breaking the law, it's slippery slope and a dangerous thing to do.
Grifters-in-chief from the WSJhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-28...
This sort of thing always makes he go 'huh?'
Why would you link to an alt-right pick-up of a Wall Street Journal OP/ED.
Why wouldn't you just link to the WSJ OP/ED??
The thought process confuses me.
Seems like this new email issue is coming from the FBI's investigation of Anthony Weiner! He was apparently sexting an underage girl and they were looking at his Phone I believe. He's the gift that just keeps on giving.
11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
djsunyc wrote:new device was weiner's sexting phone lolololol...so is a picture of his nuts considered classified info?
OMG I thought you were joking! 
Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.
fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:Knickoftime wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:holfresh wrote:FBI probing new Hillary Clinton emails...
What took them so long?
From what I gathered reading this forum, it appears Clinton and secret world bank illuminati has allowed or directed the FBI to do this.
Good point but at least no "laws" were broken. Hillary is a regular Alice Capone.
You realize she breaks the law and kids in 3rd world countries get funding for food and pharmaceuticals. But you call her Al Capone. You have to work so hard to criminalize her. Your effort is noted.
Does it really take much work to criminalize a person who has openly broken the law? My favorite is the Quid Pro Quo with the FBI, or perhaps it was the obvious murder, I mean suicide, of Vince Foster. (If not there are another 39 or so unfortunate death suicides to choose from.)
It is not personal with her, it is about wanting a better world.
I call her Alice Capone, because neither her nor Al Capone have been convicted of crimes.
It is nice that she has done some good to balance all the bad. Don't let it delude the bad she has done. I'm sure Kissinger has done a lot "to help" the poor as well.
And all the dead people in Libya are probably aware of all the good she has done.
She is not here for us. She serves others.
Bonn1997 wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.
30 days before the election and 11 year old video....
Same wheelhouse.
Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.
The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).
The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.
This is low-information at work.
Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.
A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.
We need to be better than this. All of us.
"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.
THAT's what's important today.
earthmansurfer wrote:Does it really take much work to criminalize a person who has openly broken the law?
A conviction often helps.
My favorite is the Quid Pro Quo with the FBI,
Which didn't actually occur.
or perhaps it was the obvious murder, I mean suicide, of Vince Foster. (If not there are another 39 or so unfortunate death suicides to choose from.)
Here's a tip EMS, if your news sources has ominous background music, find better ones.
earthmansurfer wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:Knickoftime wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:holfresh wrote:FBI probing new Hillary Clinton emails...
What took them so long?
From what I gathered reading this forum, it appears Clinton and secret world bank illuminati has allowed or directed the FBI to do this.
Good point but at least no "laws" were broken. Hillary is a regular Alice Capone.
You realize she breaks the law and kids in 3rd world countries get funding for food and pharmaceuticals. But you call her Al Capone. You have to work so hard to criminalize her. Your effort is noted.
Does it really take much work to criminalize a person who has openly broken the law? My favorite is the Quid Pro Quo with the FBI, or perhaps it was the obvious murder, I mean suicide, of Vince Foster. (If not there are another 39 or so unfortunate death suicides to choose from.)
It is not personal with her, it is about wanting a better world.
I call her Alice Capone, because neither her nor Al Capone have been convicted of crimes.
It is nice that she has done some good to balance all the bad. Don't let it delude the bad she has done. I'm sure Kissinger has done a lot "to help" the poor as well.
And all the dead people in Libya are probably aware of all the good she has done.
She is not here for us. She serves others.
you have already come to that conclusion and eat up anything that supports it. I mean the Vince Foster thing is area 54. If I dont agree Im sheep driven by gov driven media. Its tired.
Of course she serves others. She takes lobby money. The question is will she serve us along the way? History shows a reasonable context that she will. She is not my candidate and doesnt represent the parts of her party that are most important to me, but she is nothing close to what Trump is. You are so focused on being right about her being crooked that have stopped looking at what this all actually means... and that is who will be a better POTUS and who will best serve the people of this country.
Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.
30 days before the election and 11 year old video....
Same wheelhouse.
Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.
The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).
The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.
This is low-information at work.
Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.
A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.
We need to be better than this. All of us.
"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.
THAT's what's important today.
Truth is nothing, perception is everything.
There is nothing rational in most people voting.
So this is a big deal.
The problem is there is nothing Trump can do to make perception of him worth from what it is.
Brilliant... isn't it?
arkrud wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.
30 days before the election and 11 year old video....
Same wheelhouse.
Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.
The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).
The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.
This is low-information at work.
Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.
A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.
We need to be better than this. All of us.
"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.
THAT's what's important today.
Truth is nothing, perception is everything.
There is nothing rational in most people voting.
So this is a big deal.
The problem is there is nothing Trump can do to make perception of him worth from what it is.
Brilliant... isn't it?
Oh I don't know...Maybe Derrick Rose type coverage on Trump's upcoming rape trial of a 13 year old girl in December might have impact..
arkrud wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:Knickoftime wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:11 days before the election? The timing of this is absurd. Comey is a lifelong Republican and I bet he had this planned all along. It looks like he was playing chess while everyone else was playing checkers.
This is no better than people claiming Clinton was behind the Access Hollywood video.
Don't draw conclusions because you can think of a theory.
That is EVERYthing wrong with the Trump candidacy.
Be better.
11 days before the election a life long Republican decides to investigate the Democratic Presidential candidate. That doesn't raise eyebrows?
I was saying "I bet" like "I think there's a good chance" not that I actually know it, though.
30 days before the election and 11 year old video....
Same wheelhouse.
Weiner was married to Abedin. Abedin is Clinton's closet advisor. New sexting messages did surface several weeks back, after the FBI concluded its Clinton investigation. Weiner was being investigated for possibly inappropriate contact with a minor. His phone logically would have been confiscated.
The chain of events seems perfectly reasonable to me. Unless we won't to go with this is all a big long-tail conspiracy using Weiner (I don't).
The problem with this stuff is it fosters an environment in which just the word "investigation" makes people jump for joy or climb out on a ledge.
This is low-information at work.
Comey's letter makes it clear there is no suspicion or expectation anything pertinent will be found, only that due dilligence must be performed.
A few months ago Comey being a Republican was proof his conclusion was fair. Now its grounds for suspicion?? Can't be both.
We need to be better than this. All of us.
"Investigation" is not a dirty word. We have no idea what will or will not be found.
THAT's what's important today.
Truth is nothing, perception is everything.
There is nothing rational in most people voting.
So this is a big deal.
The problem is there is nothing Trump can do to make perception of him worth from what it is.
Brilliant... isn't it?
Not really, no.
Sorry, not a buyer of spiritual nihilism.
They're saying it was a laptop that Weiner used and that apparently also Huma Abedin also used and so they are going to dig around and see if any of the emails contained classified info.
Just my opinion, but I think this is just more BS. There has been a very loud group in the FBI that has been wanting more to be done against Clinton. I suspect that there is some level of politics going on within the bureau. The same thing was going on in the DOJ. There was a group that wanted AG Loretta Lynch to pursue prosecution of Clinton. Don't be naive in thinking that there aren't very political people within these organizations.
Knickoftime wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Please do not try to humanize breaking the law, it's slippery slope and a dangerous thing to do.
Grifters-in-chief from the WSJhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-28...
This sort of thing always makes he go 'huh?'
Why would you link to an alt-right pick-up of a Wall Street Journal OP/ED.
Why wouldn't you just link to the WSJ OP/ED??
The thought process confuses me.
It confuses you because you need to read ulterior motives and complex thought process into a simple act of pasting a link. There's nothing Alt right about zero hedge, any more or less than WSJ. I don't subscribe to WSJ and I just happened on the article I linked to when browsing CNN at work. You could have found the article and posted it very easily if it was so important to you, but chose to respond with this crap instead.
Hillary and Anthony Weiner: Stronger Together!
Obama will be speaking at a rally for her and he has to save her or it's all over. I guess he'll have to throw doubt on the investigation or smear Comey even though he was wildly praising Comey recently. Hillary has to fix this and do it today!
meloshouldgo wrote:
It confuses you because you need to read ulterior motives and complex thought process into a simple act of pasting a link. There's nothing Alt right about zero hedge, any more or less than WSJ.
Yeah, there is.
I don't subscribe to WSJ and I just happened on the article I linked to when browsing CNN at work. You could have found the article and posted it very easily if it was so important to you, but chose to respond with this crap instead.
It was not.
It was an OP/ED to an OP/ED (which is not behind a paywall). I assumed (I think fairly) that you were responding to the Zero Hedge characterization of the WSJ, which begins..."While the majority of the mainstream media is content to suckle at the teat of the Clinton/Establishment machine..."
My apologies if you found that as stupid as I did like anyone should.
