Knicks · Where the heck is Hillary Clinton? (page 161)

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-john-kin...

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

meloshouldgo wrote:CNN going after Hillary now - I think the Donna Brazile thing hurt their image quite a bit

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-john-kin...

djsunyc wrote:so comey didn't want to influence the election with this info:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-come...

FBI Director James Comey argued privately that it was too close to Election Day for the United States government to name Russia as meddling in the U.S. election and ultimately ensured that the FBI's name was not on the document that the U.S. government put out, a former FBI official tells CNBC.

The official said some government insiders are perplexed as to why Comey would have election timing concerns with the Russian disclosure but not with the Huma Abedin email discovery disclosure he made Friday.

In the end, the Department of Homeland Security and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued the statement on Oct. 7, saying "The U.S. intelligence community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations…These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process."

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment on Comey's role in the decision making surrounding the Oct. 7 statement.

According to the former official, Comey agreed with the conclusion the intelligence community came to: "A foreign power was trying to undermine the election. He believed it to be true, but was against putting it out before the election." Comey's position, this official said, was "if it is said, it shouldn't come from the FBI, which as you'll recall it did not."

Comey took a different approach toward releasing information about the discovery of emails on a laptop that was used by former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife Huma Abedin, the official said. "By doing a press conference, and personally testifying and giving his opinion about the conduct, he made this about James Comey and his credibility," the official said. "You can see why he did it, from his perspective, once he had had that press conference."

This is so insane...How did we get here..Americans covering for Russia because of party politics..Republicans willing the join the Russians against the Democrats...

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

No one believes what you are saying because it has no basis ..

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

No one believes what you are saying because it has no basis ..

You speak for one, not every-one.
Just like me.

Keeping things on point:
Donna Brazile, well she just sort of showed Hillary cheated during the debates, eh?
All of Hillary's scripted responses seem to make a bit more sense now.

How many people in the last two weeks have been fired or resigned, who were in Hillary's "camp"? This is getting LOL now.

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

Complete BS if ever there was. Although it does prove how well propaganda works. Nothing you have provided correlates Clinton with mass war. Unless you count unverified accusations as "facts" and anecdotal "evidence" from amateur video clips

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

No one believes what you are saying because it has no basis ..

You speak for one, not every-one.
Just like me.

Keeping things on point:
Donna Brazile, well she just sort of showed Hillary cheated during the debates, eh?
All of Hillary's scripted responses seem to make a bit more sense now.

How many people in the last two weeks have been fired or resigned, who were in Hillary's "camp"? This is getting LOL now.

Wasn't it one question at one CNN debate?

earthmansurfer wrote:

Welpee wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

holfresh wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:

earthmansurfer wrote:Kind of interesting here. New Wikileaks emails have broke.

New email shows DNC boss giving Clinton camp debate question in advance
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/...

snippet

Another leaked email has emerged showing Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile sharing a debate question in advance with the Hillary Clinton campaign -- despite Brazile's persistent claims to the contrary.

According to documents released Monday by WikiLeaks, Brazile sent Clinton Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri an email titled, “One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash,” the night before the March 6 CNN primary debate in Flint, Mich.

And further emails and incriminating evidence. I will state now, I think this is a teaser for the big fish - The Clinton Foundation.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/Bernie4People/status/793091796268187648

Click here to view the Tweet

Trump is about to stand trial for raping a child and you're focusing on Hillary possibly being told about a question about lead poisoning?!

Let him stand trial. No argument from me. But as Holfresh said, looks like a load of BS, as do the other accusers of Trump.
And I'm not gonna let him slide if info does come out, but thus far, nada.

Again, The Clinton Foundation is the big straw that is not only going to take down Hillary, but also much much more.

BTW - Donna Brazile has either resigned or was fired. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnn-formally-...
At this rate, the DNC is not going to have many people left.

Well the other accusers seems very legitimate but you won't admit it or man up...Nor will you admit that Trump bribed Florida's AG, using funds from his unregistered "foundation", not to press charges against in the Trump University scandal...I can't keep up with the laws broken as it relates to the scam foundation...His kids never gave to the "foundation"..I wonder why???..You are supporting a guy who peeps in on 15 year olds...And that's been proven...

You think this is about me liking Trump? As if I see him as some upstanding person?

This is about a deep fear of Hillary becoming president.

And as time goes on, we will all see it was the Clinton Foundation - the real evil behind all of the inexplicable Comey, FBI, White House, etc. actions. The email thing is a tiny connection.

EMS

You fear Clinton as president but you don't think Trump would be twice as fearful given what he has done in his private/business life?

The level of corruption between Trump and Clinton is not comparable.
I'm saying A vote for Hillary is a vote for mass war and death.

Look into the Clinton Foundation.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1944229337/ref...

In Partners in Crime, two-time No. 1 New York Times bestselling author Jerome Corsi presents the detailed research and expert testimony proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Clinton Foundation is "a vast, criminal conspiracy," also described in these pages as "a slush fund for grifters."

Corsi exposes how the Clintons amassed hundreds of millions of dollars in personal net worth, while building a $2 billion empire in the Clinton Foundation. The victims are countless thousands of honest people who contributed their hard-earned money to what they thought were philanthropic causes. The sordid tale involves suspicion of Enron-like fraudulent accounting practices by none less than PricewaterhouseCoopers, a "Big Four" firm, as well as the several "shell corporations" and "pass-through" bank accounts Bill Clinton has established in secret to hide what amount to kickbacks from Clinton Foundation donors and sponsors.

In Partners in Crime, Corsi provides readers the names and addresses of state attorney generals throughout the country, explaining that any one state in the Union can get a temporary restraining order from a state judge to place the Clinton Foundation in receivership and launch law enforcement examinations of Clinton Family philanthropic fraud accomplished on a global scale.

It is not enough, Corsi concludes, to appeal to Hillary Clinton to withdraw from the 2016 presidential race in disgrace. A national campaign to "Shut Down the Clinton Foundation" must be launched, Corsi insists, to prevent Barack Obama and other heads of state worldwide from following the Clinton Family crime formula to create their own "charitable foundations" to enrich themselves upon leaving office.

holfresh wrote:

arkrud wrote:

holfresh wrote:

arkrud wrote:All I can say the real powers are entering the game when the intervention really matters.
Washington bureaucrats/large corporations behind Hillary/Democrats and secret services/law enforcement/military behind Republicans/Trump.
What is missing from the picture is anyone representing American people.
It is not about changing the way of life, it is about who controls the wealth distribution.
In any case it will be one half of 1% or another.
The Republic slowly sleeping into Empire and decadence.
The history always repeats itself.

Secret service backs trump??..Since when does the secret service shared a political opinion?

You people are so naive.. like Americans in general.
I think it is a gift... so don't worry be happy.
The real power does not give a rat a..ss about Trump or Hilary,
They just picking up puppets they think will be more easily manipulated.

We all can't be that naive as we are able to recognize and call out your BS...

Continue fighting man... There are a lot more wind-meals in the country side.
Call up Sancho Panza as battle awaits!!!

arkrud wrote:

holfresh wrote:

arkrud wrote:

holfresh wrote:

arkrud wrote:All I can say the real powers are entering the game when the intervention really matters.
Washington bureaucrats/large corporations behind Hillary/Democrats and secret services/law enforcement/military behind Republicans/Trump.
What is missing from the picture is anyone representing American people.
It is not about changing the way of life, it is about who controls the wealth distribution.
In any case it will be one half of 1% or another.
The Republic slowly sleeping into Empire and decadence.
The history always repeats itself.

Secret service backs trump??..Since when does the secret service shared a political opinion?

You people are so naive.. like Americans in general.
I think it is a gift... so don't worry be happy.
The real power does not give a rat a..ss about Trump or Hilary,
They just picking up puppets they think will be more easily manipulated.

We all can't be that naive as we are able to recognize and call out your BS...

Continue fighting man... There are a lot more wind-meals in the country side.
Call up Sancho Panza as battle awaits!!!

holfresh wrote:

djsunyc wrote:so comey didn't want to influence the election with this info:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-come...

FBI Director James Comey argued privately that it was too close to Election Day for the United States government to name Russia as meddling in the U.S. election and ultimately ensured that the FBI's name was not on the document that the U.S. government put out, a former FBI official tells CNBC.

The official said some government insiders are perplexed as to why Comey would have election timing concerns with the Russian disclosure but not with the Huma Abedin email discovery disclosure he made Friday.

In the end, the Department of Homeland Security and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued the statement on Oct. 7, saying "The U.S. intelligence community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations…These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process."

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment on Comey's role in the decision making surrounding the Oct. 7 statement.

According to the former official, Comey agreed with the conclusion the intelligence community came to: "A foreign power was trying to undermine the election. He believed it to be true, but was against putting it out before the election." Comey's position, this official said, was "if it is said, it shouldn't come from the FBI, which as you'll recall it did not."

Comey took a different approach toward releasing information about the discovery of emails on a laptop that was used by former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife Huma Abedin, the official said. "By doing a press conference, and personally testifying and giving his opinion about the conduct, he made this about James Comey and his credibility," the official said. "You can see why he did it, from his perspective, once he had had that press conference."

This is so insane...How did we get here..Americans covering for Russia because of party politics..Republicans willing the join the Russians against the Democrats...

Don't forget the Clinton plutonium deal with Russia.

Vmart wrote:

holfresh wrote:

djsunyc wrote:so comey didn't want to influence the election with this info:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/31/fbis-come...

FBI Director James Comey argued privately that it was too close to Election Day for the United States government to name Russia as meddling in the U.S. election and ultimately ensured that the FBI's name was not on the document that the U.S. government put out, a former FBI official tells CNBC.

The official said some government insiders are perplexed as to why Comey would have election timing concerns with the Russian disclosure but not with the Huma Abedin email discovery disclosure he made Friday.

In the end, the Department of Homeland Security and The Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued the statement on Oct. 7, saying "The U.S. intelligence community is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations…These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process."

An FBI spokesperson declined to comment on Comey's role in the decision making surrounding the Oct. 7 statement.

According to the former official, Comey agreed with the conclusion the intelligence community came to: "A foreign power was trying to undermine the election. He believed it to be true, but was against putting it out before the election." Comey's position, this official said, was "if it is said, it shouldn't come from the FBI, which as you'll recall it did not."

Comey took a different approach toward releasing information about the discovery of emails on a laptop that was used by former Congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife Huma Abedin, the official said. "By doing a press conference, and personally testifying and giving his opinion about the conduct, he made this about James Comey and his credibility," the official said. "You can see why he did it, from his perspective, once he had had that press conference."

This is so insane...How did we get here..Americans covering for Russia because of party politics..Republicans willing the join the Russians against the Democrats...

Don't forget the Clinton plutonium deal with Russia.

In a major speech last week, the presumptive Republican nominee recited a number of claims from Clinton Cash, a 2015 bestselling investigation into donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Among them: "Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation — $145 million dollars."

We wanted to vet this charge of Clinton engaging in pay-to-play politics.

Trump’s claim is a reductive version of his source material’s findings and runs into several problems.

First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it’s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo.

BRIGGS wrote:so Hillary had the questions to the debate. Answer no sht she answered with scripted answers. People have to get this straight. A vote for Hillary is a vote for corrupt elite. If that's in your character that's on you I'm with the people

But you are ok promoting a 70 year old dude who creeps in on nude 15 year old girls..

BRIGGS wrote:so Hillary had the questions to the debate. Answer no sht she answered with scripted answers. People have to get this straight. A vote for Hillary is a vote for corrupt elite. If that's in your character that's on you I'm with the people

holfresh wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:so Hillary had the questions to the debate. Answer no sht she answered with scripted answers. People have to get this straight. A vote for Hillary is a vote for corrupt elite. If that's in your character that's on you I'm with the people

But you are ok promoting a 70 year old dude who creeps in on nude 15 year old girls..

Come on dude--stop with the panzy hypocrite BS. I dont care if you are married to the hottest wife have the best relationship--whatever--you are still looking at every f women you can within a respectable reason--youre looking at their ass or breasts with their husband and kids right there at times if something is that good. Its just the factoid of being a man its in your DNA. This mans DNA is he needs to brag about it--so be it--who am I to judge? I care about the policies--I dont care one iota about the pssy--thats a non issue

BRIGGS wrote:

holfresh wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:so Hillary had the questions to the debate. Answer no sht she answered with scripted answers. People have to get this straight. A vote for Hillary is a vote for corrupt elite. If that's in your character that's on you I'm with the people

But you are ok promoting a 70 year old dude who creeps in on nude 15 year old girls..

Come on dude--stop with the panzy hypocrite BS. I dont care if you are married to the hottest wife have the best relationship--whatever--you are still looking at every f women you can within a respectable reason--youre looking at their ass or breasts with their husband and kids right there at times if something is that good. Its just the factoid of being a man its in your DNA. This mans DNA is he needs to brag about it--so be it--who am I to judge? I care about the policies--I dont care one iota about the pssy--thats a non issue

BRIGGS wrote:

holfresh wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:so Hillary had the questions to the debate. Answer no sht she answered with scripted answers. People have to get this straight. A vote for Hillary is a vote for corrupt elite. If that's in your character that's on you I'm with the people

But you are ok promoting a 70 year old dude who creeps in on nude 15 year old girls..

Come on dude--stop with the panzy hypocrite BS. I dont care if you are married to the hottest wife have the best relationship--whatever--you are still looking at every f women you can within a respectable reason--youre looking at their ass or breasts with their husband and kids right there at times if something is that good. Its just the factoid of being a man its in your DNA. This mans DNA is he needs to brag about it--so be it--who am I to judge? I care about the policies--I dont care one iota about the pssy--thats a non issue

but the policies are f cked. he has no method to deport people. many many economists say his "tax" plan is, and i quote, a disaster. he has no idea what to do with isis. he has no real long term solution to bring jobs back to america.

all he did was hit the nerve of disgruntled people but he's provided no real concrete plans. he talks in cliches and there is no history whatsoever that he should be trusted with ANYTHING. he says things like he's giving a wrestling promo.

don't care about the person? fine. but his policies are DOO DOO.

AND hillary is NOT an extension of obama. that's a subconsciously sexist comment saying a woman can't be her own individual and can only continue what a man has already done. hillary is more qualified than anybody in the US right now to be president. full disclosure, i wasn't even going to vote for her. i was going to vote independent until i research those two folks and found out they were idiots.

casting a vote for trump is like saying FU to the US government. but at the end of the day, he's gonna give a big FU to you. he doesn't care about you or this country.

he has a psychological disorder.