Knicks · Where the heck is Hillary Clinton? (page 183)
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/05/middleeast...
holfresh wrote:Allanfan20 wrote:holfresh wrote:Trump rushed off stage by secret service..I saw this. It was at the beginning of an event in Reno. There is no evidence to support that this was an assassination attempt. Let me say this, while I can't stand Trump at all, him being assassinated would be the worst thing imaginable. I feel that would completely open up Pandora's box as well. I'm glad he's protected and well.
I'm not a Trump supporter but I'm a little concerned for his safety post election if he loses..He stirred up lots of emotions on the campaign trail and lot of nuts out there..He will be a civilian again roaming NY and easily accessible..
He would probably have to lay low for quite awhile.
He gets into Treason (overall), Hillary's push for Libya, arms sales to Saudi Arabia when Hillary was SOS, immigration, Obama (Citibank) administration - lol, Russian and elections & Wikileaks, Trump not being allowed into office, Pressure on Assange by US Govt., United Nations Assange findings, and on.
meloshouldgo wrote:Really, Russia will launch a war because of Hillary'S accusations? Countries have been acausing each other for centuries. That doesn't lead to war. On the other hand Trump will lead us to mutually assured destruction within the US. He is making it society rupture at the seams he is provoking and stoking the hatred that had simmered undercover for so long. He has created so many deep divides with his bigotry and hate mongering and you are worried about war with Russia. Meh
Nah, I never said Russia will launch a war, didn't even imply that. I am talking about Hitlery/Killery.
She has said, she will treat cyber attacks just like any other: politically, economic and MILITARY responses.
Go to 3:10 mark:
Great video exposing Podesta by a great investigative journalist - Abby Martin.
The Empire Files: Abby Martin Exposes John Podesta
gunsnewing wrote:I would hope that after Trump wins before planning to assassinate the man would considering getting the hell out of this country. There's nothing the "tolerant" left can do that would surprise me at this pointI just think it's ironic that the right thinks Clinton shouldn't be in office for what they consider breaking the law, but are totally willing to support someone else breaking the law to help Trump get in office. I also think it revealing how shortsighted the right tends to be. For people who claim to value the constitution they're really enjoying seeing people's rights violated by wikileaks as long as it benefits them. And when a wikileaks copycat decides to hack republican emails watch how quickly they begin whining about it.
When you can't win national elections on your policies or getting the most votes, just prevent people from voting and support foreign criminals to influence our elections. Right wingers, such wonderful "Americans." Can't understand the concept of the ends not justifying the means and how the short term benefit of wikileaks is going to potentially have major long term ramifications for a lot of people, including themselves.
I will lose a lot of faith in this country if these folks are allowed to get away with this. Tuesday is going to say a lot about the state of this country.
gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..
holfresh wrote:Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..
Yep - real technology guru who does not even understand how e-mail works and has no slightest idea about cybersecurity.
Of course if her corrupted interest will be in line with some US population groups they will side-benefit from her polices but as soon as it will not be the case they will lose everything and more.
Not to say that Trump is better. Well established corrupter group of politicians may be slightly better that new one. May cost less to the people.
arkrud wrote:holfresh wrote:Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..Yep - real technology guru who does not even understand how e-mail works and has no slightest idea about cybersecurity.
Of course if her corrupted interest will be in line with some US population groups they will side-benefit from her polices but as soon as it will not be the case they will lose everything and more.
Not to say that Trump is better. Well established corrupter group of politicians may be slightly better that new one. May cost less to the people.
What you guys are great doing is trying to equate the two..Trying to say they are both corrupt and only interested in self..What you don't point out is that Hillary has spend a lifetime helping people and Trump has never helped anyone...You want to say the Clinton Foundation is corrupt which pays out 90% of the money it gets and helps 11 million people with AIDS drugs globally to name one effort, while Trump has admitted to bribing congress, he bribed an Attorney General and was fined by the IRS, he has stiffed contractors, stiff bondholders and investors. Stiffed a few banks 6 times. Stiff the American people by not paying taxes on hundred of millions of dollars of falsely reported income..And this is what we know about him, how about what we don't know...So yeah, it must all be the same...
And you want to know why African Americans don't trust the Republican Party...
https://thinkprogress.org/mass-poll-clos...
Clinton now +18 among college educated women...Smart, pun intended...
holfresh wrote:Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..
Speaking of technology, perhaps Hillary needs to learn about her maid printing classified documents.
NY POST - Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-dir...
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/795068270198091776
Click here to view the Tweet
earthmansurfer wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/DrJillStein/status/795068270198091776
Click here to view the Tweet
From spray painting tanks a few weeks ago to posting tanks and talking foreign policy..Jill Stein stepping up her game for the General..
Tell Jill dearest we had a 9/11 commission report that contracts her..
earthmansurfer wrote:holfresh wrote:Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..Speaking of technology, perhaps Hillary needs to learn about her maid printing classified documents.
NY POST - Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-dir...
Talk about deflecting!
You can find plenty of accusations against Trump too. If I remember right, you said you don't like either candidate and aren't voting. (Sorry if I'm confusing you with someone else.) You seem to spend a trillion times the effort looking for anything negative about Clinton though. In this age of technology, you'll never find a 100% clean candidate again. The possibility that a maid might have printed a sensitive, unclassified document doesn't sound nearly as serious as the accusations of Trump's Fraud, child rape, sexual assault, employment demonstrate, ties to Russia and more.
Bonn1997 wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:holfresh wrote:Welpee wrote:holfresh wrote:Not to mention a president who actually knows what's she talking about when it comes to foreign affairs and has the intellectual capacity to understand complex matters versus having a "secret plan."Bonn1997 wrote:gunsnewing wrote:^I can maybe buy the argument about not knowing what our future holds and fear of direction. But no one can honestly tell me they are enthusiastic and pleased about the prospects of Hillary Rodham Clinton leading you and I.
I am very excited about the possibility of a progressive supreme court.
Along with the Sumpreme Court, I'm excited to have a President that actually believes in Science and economic studies to understand what's really happening to the middle class in terms of wage and job growth..
Do mention...How about a president who can embrace how rapidly technology has changed the world in the last 15/20 years and some one who is ready to deal with what will happen in the next 4/8 years..Not some one who thinks the answer is taking the country back to 1960/70s..Trump is on record as saying he doesn't like to read..Bodes well for our future..Speaking of technology, perhaps Hillary needs to learn about her maid printing classified documents.
NY POST - Clinton directed her maid to print out classified materials
As secretary of state, Hillary Clinton routinely asked her maid to print out sensitive government e-mails and documents — including ones containing classified information — from her house in Washington, DC, e-mails and FBI memos show. But the housekeeper lacked the security clearance to handle such material.
http://nypost.com/2016/11/06/clinton-dir...
Talk about deflecting!
You can find plenty of accusations against Trump too. If I remember right, you said you don't like either candidate and aren't voting. (Sorry if I'm confusing you with someone else.) You seem to spend a trillion times the effort looking for anything negative about Clinton though. In this age of technology, you'll never find a 100% clean candidate again. The possibility that a maid might have printed a sensitive, unclassified document doesn't sound nearly as serious as the accusations of Trump's Fraud, child rape, sexual assault, employment demonstrate, ties to Russia and more.
Deflecting? I have come out and told you exactly where I stand.
Hillary is corrupt to the core and it should be known.
As I stated regarding CTR (Correct the Record) and Reddit a few weeks back here. A complaint has now formally been filed. They are spending millions affecting posts on Reddit and I have witnessed it daily.
http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/fec-comp... The CLC’s complaint alleges Correct the Record has made $5.95 million in in-kind contributions in the form of coordinated expenditures that were accepted by the Clinton campaign. The complaint alleges such contributions violate the Federal Election Campaign Act (“FECA”), 52 U.S.C. § 30101, et seq., and Commission regulations.The Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission on Thursday that accuses the Clinton Campaign of illegally coordinating with David Brock’s Super PAC Correct the Record.