media elected him too. clinton had all her policies and everything outlined on her website. but media didn't cover that, it was all emails and pumping up trump - and many americans fell right in line.
I can't imagine how nuts Bannon must have been in those NSC meetings to finally get the boot..
Bannon threatened to quit...
holfresh wrote:Bannon threatened to quit...
A true patriot serving his country.....
holfresh wrote:Bannon threatened to quit...
"No..."
*takes bite of sandwich*
"...please..."
*takes sip of drink*
"...don't go..."
*pulls out phone*
So the Trump Administration, specifically Nikki Haley and Rex Tillerson went from saying that it was up to the people of Syria to decide what happens to Assad three days ago to now saying Assad cannot be the future leader of Syria..What changed??..Coherent well thought out policy...
Trump said the chemical attack change his mind???..Does he read intelligence at all??
US launch military strike on Syria..
holfresh wrote:US launch military strike on Syria..
Yep... Long overdo.. Time to assert our-self.
arkrud wrote:holfresh wrote:US launch military strike on Syria..
Yep... Long overdo.. Time to assert our-self.
Quick response...
Nice way to change the storyline...
CNN correspondent in Russia is saying that this is the final nail in the coffin if people thought the US and Russia would patch things up under the new Administration...Hmmmmmmmmmmmm..
Russia was told the strike would happen throughout the day..
So Trump isn't a puppet after all.
But if this is just one strike it seems a bit futile dosen't it? I mean they still got 5 more bases.
TPercy wrote:But if this is just one strike it seems a bit futile dosen't it? I mean they still got 5 more bases.
Its more of a warning... and most likely directed at Iran, North Korea, and Russia and China by proxy.
Just means the soft politics is over... everyone needs to think before making a move.
Kissinger politics are back in action. Welcome to the Cold War and show of force.
If country is not asserting the force it has - it has no force.
arkrud wrote:TPercy wrote:But if this is just one strike it seems a bit futile dosen't it? I mean they still got 5 more bases.
Its more of a warning... and most likely directed at Iran, North Korea, and Russia and China by proxy.
Just means the soft politics is over... everyone needs to think before making a move.
Kissinger politics are back in action. Welcome to the Cold War and show of force.
If country is not asserting the force it has - it has no force.
Or it's more of a show for the American people...Russia was told several times thruought the day about when and where the strike would happen, for which I'm sure they told Syria who moved the assets..
GustavBahler wrote:Do as I say....
According to CNN he did call in top Democrats and Republicans to brief them about the issue.
TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Do as I say....
According to CNN he did call in top Democrats and Republicans to brief them about the issue.
Not the same a getting a vote on a strike is it?
holfresh wrote:arkrud wrote:TPercy wrote:But if this is just one strike it seems a bit futile dosen't it? I mean they still got 5 more bases.
Its more of a warning... and most likely directed at Iran, North Korea, and Russia and China by proxy.
Just means the soft politics is over... everyone needs to think before making a move.
Kissinger politics are back in action. Welcome to the Cold War and show of force.
If country is not asserting the force it has - it has no force.
Or it's more of a show for the American people...Russia was told several times thruought the day about when and where the strike would happen, for which I'm sure they told Syria who moved the assets..
Bit of a reach IMO.
They made contact with on ground Russian forces to assure that their wasn't any Russian casualties. Seems like standard procedure to me. I don't know how you make the leap to that.
