smackeddog wrote:Jusuf Nurkic just had a 7 points (2 of 8 shooting) 7 rebounds 2 assists 5 turnovers game. Our boy KP could not to that.
Don't get me wrong, there is a ton to like about Nurkic. He moves extremely well for a big man of his size, and even with injuries, he still can get around. For a classic "Big Monster" type big man, his court awareness and situational awareness are very very good. He is not afraid to bang it out, and in fact, he appears to want to bang it out. If he played in an earlier era, we'd see him rip Danny Fortson's throat out ala Patrick Swayze in Road House and piss on Fortson's dead corpse. If he faced the Bad Boys, he'd chew up Mahorn and Salley for lunch. He is a pretty good passer for a big man and he does force other teams to alter their shots. In the post, his fundamentals are solid and he operates well in traffic and in close contact and he can hoover them off the glass.
He can't shoot from long range, he is a foul machine who, on top of that, doesn't get any close calls from the refs, and he will likely profile out as a player always fighting injuries to stay in the lineup.
Can he help an NBA team? Yes, but he needs a strong fit
How does he profile out? As a 3rd or 4th rotational big, to shade his ability to stay on the court and keep him as healthy as possible
He's a matchup weapon, and in the right matchup, he will light someone up. But he's not going to offer the kind of consistency and provide the kind of usage the Knicks would likely need from where they stand now.
He would be a good light pickup if the Knicks could get him cheap ( they wouldn't), if they could use him to his maximize effectiveness ( sadly, they wouldn't) , could shade his usage ( they probably can't or would not) and accept his injury profile ( just not enough talent on the roster to hide both him and Noah)
Comparing Nurkic to KP is both unfair to KP and Nurkic.
The prevailing point remains the same, you can't just look at a small sample size and just the counting stats without any kind of actual context to evaluate a player. Melo can't help the Knicks because he just doesn't care. Nurkic would not help the Knicks because his fit and limitations create trade offs the current franchise and roster can't resolve.
Sadly, Nurkic does possess many elements that would make him very effective in a "Triangle" offense, but his skill set simply runs counter to the kind of big man that Hornacek needs and operates best with ( i.e. a Stretch 5) In the end, players don't matter and won't matter until the Knicks fix their front office problems first. Get a young GM with a background in a front office, a winning one, and let him pick his coach, one with the same vision and viewpoint on building a team and style of play, and then let them do their jobs without owner interference. Is it that hard? The Knicks make it so much damn harder than it has to be.