Knicks · If Ball goes to LA/should we trade for Russell ? (page 2)

meloshouldgo @ 3/25/2017 10:19 AM
You are making assumptions about separation and tiering not borne out by facts yet, in Ball's case.
But i never invested the time to learn NBA trade rules and probably wont. If they need more we can thriw in KOQ or Holiday. The idea of my post was the lakers don't need another PG and they should be willing to trade down. Others here can do a better job of figuring out the right value but I dont value Ball that much higher than the third pick right now. You are making this soundlike the difference between picking LeBron and Trevor Ariza
TripleThreat @ 3/25/2017 5:19 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:You are making assumptions about separation and tiering not borne out by facts yet, in Ball's case.
But i never invested the time to learn NBA trade rules and probably wont. If they need more we can thriw in KOQ or Holiday. The idea of my post was the lakers don't need another PG and they should be willing to trade down. Others here can do a better job of figuring out the right value but I dont value Ball that much higher than the third pick right now. You are making this soundlike the difference between picking LeBron and Trevor Ariza


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5WWy_0VLS4

CrushAlot @ 3/25/2017 5:36 PM
I think if the Knicks can get a top 4 pick they will be in great shape. Ball, Fultz, Jackson, Fox, and Tatum would all be great additions to the roster. The Knicks have too many needs to fill. They should be able to get a very good player without giving up a future first.
Page 2 of 2