Unigone
Ahh bledsoe, another injury prone pg...niceee
Before reading this thread or the article, in Nalod's thread I suggested that the deal that may work is Bledsoe, Chriss or Bender and with the 4 take Tatum or Jackson. At 8 take Monk or Kennard.
Hernangomez
Chriss
Tatum or Jackson
Monk or Kennard
Bledsoe
So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
nyknickzingis wrote:Before reading this thread or the article, in Nalod's thread I suggested that the deal that may work is Bledsoe, Chriss or Bender and with the 4 take Tatum or Jackson. At 8 take Monk or Kennard.Hernangomez
Chriss
Tatum or Jackson
Monk or Kennard
Bledsoe
That would be fantastic!
EnySpree wrote:nyknickzingis wrote:Before reading this thread or the article, in Nalod's thread I suggested that the deal that may work is Bledsoe, Chriss or Bender and with the 4 take Tatum or Jackson. At 8 take Monk or Kennard.Hernangomez
Chriss
Tatum or Jackson
Monk or Kennard
Bledsoe
That would be fantastic!
We would have a good balanced young athletic team.
chriss 6-10, 19 years old, got game.
Bledsoe.....Pg, not the future. Not DRose either.
Jackson, tatum or issac
8th pick.
Willy.
Not bad. Young, upside. Chriss is good. Bascially its KP, a 4th pick for a 4th and 8th.
GustavBahler wrote:So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
It's not a reset if the group sucks. We have to be a fully formed team to call it reset. Lottery trans don't reset... They rebuild
Nalod wrote:chriss 6-10, 19 years old, got game.
Bledsoe.....Pg, not the future. Not DRose either.
Jackson, tatum or issac
8th pick.
Willy.Not bad. Young, upside. Chriss is good. Bascially its KP, a 4th pick for a 4th and 8th.
fanfuckingtastic
EnySpree wrote:nyknickzingis wrote:Before reading this thread or the article, in Nalod's thread I suggested that the deal that may work is Bledsoe, Chriss or Bender and with the 4 take Tatum or Jackson. At 8 take Monk or Kennard.Hernangomez
Chriss
Tatum or Jackson
Monk or Kennard
Bledsoe
That would be fantastic!
It's 5 relatively young players, 4 of them future developing players who can only get better.
Problem is not one of them are on the level of KP talent wise.
But in a rebuild, it looks solid.
GustavBahler wrote:So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
What he does and what he is maybe entertaining are two completely different things.
Waiting until he does something before deciding to like it or not is always advisable.
Me, I HOPE he entertains all kinds of stuff, even stuff I'd hate if it came to pass.
We're officially to the point of criticizing people for considering things.
BigDaddyG wrote:
Woj reporting completely contrasting news on this.
Who to believe?
Could Steven A be right? Porzingis brothers forcing this. To make Phil feel heat. Pretending different infront of the camera.
Slam getting their info from Porzingis brothers for sure.
Woj maybe talking to teams directly.
I tend to believe Woj more on this.
nyknickzingis wrote:EnySpree wrote:nyknickzingis wrote:Before reading this thread or the article, in Nalod's thread I suggested that the deal that may work is Bledsoe, Chriss or Bender and with the 4 take Tatum or Jackson. At 8 take Monk or Kennard.Hernangomez
Chriss
Tatum or Jackson
Monk or Kennard
Bledsoe
That would be fantastic!
It's 5 relatively young players, 4 of them future developing players who can only get better.
Problem is not one of them are on the level of KP talent wise.
But in a rebuild, it looks solid.
They're only gonna be here a yr or 2..so its cool, the name of the game is to go thought the most players in 5 yrs any franchise on the planet has seen..
I've been walking around in a constant state of dread since I woke up this morning
Phoenix sports talk guy...
Knickoftime wrote:GustavBahler wrote:So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
What he does and what he is maybe entertaining are two completely different things.
Waiting until he does something before deciding to like it or not is always advisable.
Me, I HOPE he entertains all kinds of stuff, even stuff I'd hate if it came to pass.
We're officially to the point of criticizing people for considering things.
I said "might", did not say it was a done deal. I expressed my opinion on this possible scenario, thats what we do here when stories are posted. If you dont want to comment on a story until it is absolutely official, you go right ahead.
EnySpree wrote:GustavBahler wrote:So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
It's not a reset if the group sucks. We have to be a fully formed team to call it reset. Lottery trans don't reset... They rebuild
Its a reset when you empty the roster and start again. Especially when it involves these players spending the next 2 years trying to learn a system that is so difficult to pick up, that its resulted one of the highest roster turnovers in the NBA since Phil took the job.
This time of year reporters are just throwing stuff out there. If something sticks, they can always take claim even if it was just a great guess and great timing. The Knicks are the punching bag, so we will see a lot of these reports out there.
Again I cant believe some are swallowing this crap. Slam Magazine? Yeah ok
GustavBahler wrote:Knickoftime wrote:GustavBahler wrote:So Phil actually might be hitting the reset button again going into YEAR 4, after drafting a possible franchise player we have been waiting decades for. Whats not to like?
What he does and what he is maybe entertaining are two completely different things.
Waiting until he does something before deciding to like it or not is always advisable.
Me, I HOPE he entertains all kinds of stuff, even stuff I'd hate if it came to pass.
We're officially to the point of criticizing people for considering things.
I said "might", did not say it was a done deal. I expressed my opinion on this possible scenario, thats what we do here when stories are posted. If you dont want to comment on a story until it is absolutely official, you go right ahead.
You left out the "actually", which is you giving credence to for all we know might be utter fiction.
