SupremeCommander wrote:fishmike wrote:Welpee wrote:EnySpree wrote:Welpee wrote:A win is a win but this one was not very satisfying after nearly blowing another big lead.
Not very satisfying? You are a knick fan..... we haven't won enough the last 15 years to make comments like that lol
lol, good point!
I mean I sure didnt enjoy watching them blow the lead, but I think they learned more from blowing the lead and having to fight back than coasting. I thought that showed something. This crew is easy to get behind. Its a team thing and a joy to watch. They are really getting after the ball and playing hard on D.
I didn't think a team featuring a 22 32 y/o, castoffs at PG, and having a SG play SF would be entertaining to watch but you are absolutely right
Fixed it...assume that is what you meant.
some point soon, people will be re-visiting the hang your ass thread and revising their estimates
NYKBocker wrote:Chandler wrote:some point soon, people will be re-visiting the hang your ass thread and revising their estimates
My 50+ predication is not looking so far fetched now 


I think I put down something like that too -- suffering from eternal optimism
Did anyone else notice the piss poor defense Beasley displayed? Never gets his hands up, just watches his guy blow past him. Reminds me of another old Knick, can't place the name right now...I hope he gets benched, we can't let that lackadaisical play stand.
Not to mention the back to back TO’s resulting in 4 points. Pretty much trash except if we’re ever absolutely struggling for points.
Gudris wrote:stanleybostitch wrote:Did anyone else notice the piss poor defense Beasley displayed? Never gets his hands up, just watches his guy blow past him. Reminds me of another old Knick, can't place the name right now...I hope he gets benched, we can't let that lackadaisical play stand.
+100
be careful guys, EnySpree is gonna accuse you of not paying attention
Chandler wrote:some point soon, people will be re-visiting the hang your ass thread and revising their estimates
I am always off 15 games because I am too positive. This year I went the other way. This is the year I want to be wrong.
nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Chandler wrote:some point soon, people will be re-visiting the hang your ass thread and revising their estimates
I am always off 15 games because I am too positive. This year I went the other way. This is the year I want to be wrong.
this is crazy, hope we can keep this up
this is crazy, hope we can keep this up
We won't. We'll take a step back. And hopefully that will be part of the growing process. And when it does don't be one of the boneheads climbing up the GW Bridge.
The real plus/minus
5 STARERS combined for -7
Beasley, McDermott, and O'quinn combined for +27
I watched the game and this feels like an aberration, but that is why these numbers are important
Chandler wrote:some point soon, people will be re-visiting the hang your ass thread and revising their estimates
No can do - it's a one time shot.