and no doubt it starts with the midget at the top.
relax, next season new lottery rules will be in place, no big difference between 6 or 9
Carter, Porter, Bridges, Knox
2 of those 3 will be available at 9. We need so much it really doesn't matter.
blkexec wrote:Carter, Porter, Bridges, Knox2 of those 3 will be available at 9. We need so much it really doesn't matter.
It is still frustrating, though. Maybe we get lucky with the draw this year, but with our luck, who knows.
Absolute F-ing morons, but completely expected
blkexec wrote:Carter, Porter, Bridges, Knox2 of those 3 will be available at 9. We need so much it really doesn't matter.
I don't think Carter or Porter will be there.
Gudris wrote:relax, next season new lottery rules will be in place, no big difference between 6 or 9
impact is on this draft. Cave lost and got the better pick.
The Knicks are so damn stupid
CrushAlot wrote:blkexec wrote:Carter, Porter, Bridges, Knox2 of those 3 will be available at 9. We need so much it really doesn't matter.
I don't think Carter or Porter will be there.
In reference to what I posted....I don't understand the reason behind your reply. You said the same thing i said....i meant to say 2 of 4 will be there....maybe that confused you. BTW.... I think Knox has as much potential as the other guys. Knox seems like the type of guy to play better in the NBA than he did in college.
Andrew wrote:good thing there are at least 10 guys that would have gone #1 in other years drafts....http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Yeah and I still believe that--or close to it. The problem is we couldve set a plan as a franchise to "atleast" lose those last two games --that cost us as many as 3 spots. There was only negative value winning. We can never help ourselves.
BRIGGS wrote:Andrew wrote:good thing there are at least 10 guys that would have gone #1 in other years drafts....http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Yeah and I still believe that--or close to it. The problem is we couldve set a plan as a franchise to "atleast" lose those last two games --that cost us as many as 3 spots. There was only negative value winning. We can never help ourselves.
I don't get it. You said the top 10 are all worthy of a #1 spot in any other year. So that means picking 8 or 9 should be more than fine..right?
You know the Knicks are going to get jumped on lottery day. That is almost a given. Probably going to be picking 10 or 11. With that said if there is a player that the Knicks are targeting be prepared to be in the outside looking in. The Knicks probably take a player that has no business being a Knick. Like Jordan Hill.
Vmart wrote:You know the Knicks are going to get jumped on lottery day. That is almost a given. Probably going to be picking 10 or 11. With that said if there is a player that the Knicks are targeting be prepared to be in the outside looking in. The Knicks probably take a player that has no business being a Knick. Like Jordan Hill.
your morning cheerios contained:
a) piss
b) vinegar
c) all of the above
Its 2018 and you are talking about Jordan Hill. So glad you shared this with us today.
While winning the last game sucked.
We won with Frank getting 37mins
Burke 42 mins
Doston 33mins
Hicks 30mins
Kornet 28mins
Jacks 19mins
When you attempt to lose all you can do is play the end of your bench 30 mins which was done. Hicks and Kornet dropping 15 & 23 pts. I mean....
Vmart wrote:You know the Knicks are going to get jumped on lottery day. That is almost a given. Probably going to be picking 10 or 11. With that said if there is a player that the Knicks are targeting be prepared to be in the outside looking in. The Knicks probably take a player that has no business being a Knick. Like Jordan Hill.
The only reason we got Hill is because Walsh and his team didnt do their homework, were more interestsd in landing LeBron at all cost. We have a much better scouting staff, personel in place this time IMO. I dont see Perry taking this draft lightly. Wherever we pick, Im confident this front office will at the very least, do their homework. Wether or not the pick pans out is another matter.
fishmike wrote:Vmart wrote:You know the Knicks are going to get jumped on lottery day. That is almost a given. Probably going to be picking 10 or 11. With that said if there is a player that the Knicks are targeting be prepared to be in the outside looking in. The Knicks probably take a player that has no business being a Knick. Like Jordan Hill.
your morning cheerios contained:
a) piss
b) vinegar
c) all of the aboveIts 2018 and you are talking about Jordan Hill. So glad you shared this with us today.
And your is Lucky Charms right. Few more of these and your piss and vinegar comes in with verbal abuse. Fish you shouldn’t talk about piss and vinegar.
newyorknewyork wrote:While winning the last game sucked. We won with Frank getting 37mins
Burke 42 mins
Doston 33mins
Hicks 30mins
Kornet 28mins
Jacks 19mins
When you attempt to lose all you can do is play the end of your bench 30 mins which was done. Hicks and Kornet dropping 15 & 23 pts. I mean....
yup. Exactly what was hornacek suppose to do? Tell them to stop scoring? These guys are trying to prove they belong.
BRIGGS wrote:Andrew wrote:good thing there are at least 10 guys that would have gone #1 in other years drafts....http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Yeah and I still believe that--or close to it. The problem is we couldve set a plan as a franchise to "atleast" lose those last two games --that cost us as many as 3 spots. There was only negative value winning. We can never help ourselves.
not always a valid notion. a few years ago we similarly "screwed" ourselves with a couple of late wins and dropped 2 spots to 4th where we landed kp. what do you think the odds are we would have taken russsell or okafer instead with the 2 or 3? maybe close to 100%? we did help ourselves there.
NYKBocker wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Andrew wrote:good thing there are at least 10 guys that would have gone #1 in other years drafts....http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topi...
Yeah and I still believe that--or close to it. The problem is we couldve set a plan as a franchise to "atleast" lose those last two games --that cost us as many as 3 spots. There was only negative value winning. We can never help ourselves.
I don't get it. You said the top 10 are all worthy of a #1 spot in any other year. So that means picking 8 or 9 should be more than fine..right?
As a franchise --we ouwldve had more options at 6-7 and better odds at a top 3 and thats all u can ask. This team as a whole sucks--no plan
