Knicks · Frank haters can suck it (page 27)

NYKBocker wrote:

Panos wrote:

Nalod wrote:Rainman pile on after a bad stretch. Drunk uncle happy.
Give up on him after 5 games where he played with the Groin thing. Smooth.
His plus 5 last night was actually pretty good. His dunk attempt actually spurred the team to a lead.
One of the few knicks that can actually have a good game without scoring. If you see the game you know what Im talking about.
If your boxscore reading, it looks bad. If you saw his penetrations were amped up and he had a few great passes because of it.
Players that are trying to play out of a comfort zone sometimes do this. Its called uneven progress.
Frank played with a different level of aggression last night. You don't start dunking on 7footers over night. I love that he tried it.
He is taking it to the rim over those last 5 games.

Does this mean we don't try to improve? Of course not. Just not after a bad shooting night.

0-8, but his *missed* dunk spurred the team on?
My, how far low the bar has fallen. Do you realize how desperate that sounds?
Did we give Charles Smith credit for "trying" when he missed 4 layups against the Bulls?

He was FUCKING FOULED!

I was at that game

Nalod wrote:

Panos wrote:

Nalod wrote:Rainman pile on after a bad stretch. Drunk uncle happy.
Give up on him after 5 games where he played with the Groin thing. Smooth.
His plus 5 last night was actually pretty good. His dunk attempt actually spurred the team to a lead.
One of the few knicks that can actually have a good game without scoring. If you see the game you know what Im talking about.
If your boxscore reading, it looks bad. If you saw his penetrations were amped up and he had a few great passes because of it.
Players that are trying to play out of a comfort zone sometimes do this. Its called uneven progress.
Frank played with a different level of aggression last night. You don't start dunking on 7footers over night. I love that he tried it.
He is taking it to the rim over those last 5 games.

Does this mean we don't try to improve? Of course not. Just not after a bad shooting night.

0-8, but his *missed* dunk spurred the team on?
My, how far low the bar has fallen. Do you realize how desperate that sounds?
Did we give Charles Smith credit for "trying" when he missed 4 layups against the Bulls?

Team built a lead. Frank and Mitch were positive 5. Know who else was positive? Nobody. He goes o-8 and The second unit did real well in the second period.
Dotson got hot. Few games ago he was anyting but. How it goes. Did you see the dunk attempt? It was in traffic and would have posterized Dwight Howard.
Our little Passive Frenchie is growing up. Was it a Charles smith moment? Hardly.

Frank played 12 minutes. He is wearing arm sleaves now? Maybe he has an injury or the groin again? He was plus 5 in his brief time. Defense matters.
Whose name calling BTW? "Rainman" and "Drunk Uncle" are thread descriptors.

Frank went after KP. Clearly a foul right there. Nobody is crowning him a star but how do you not root for this 21 year old.

Thread descriptors? WTF does that mean? You call knicks1825 Rainman in every thread. It's implying he is autistic. I have no idea if he is or is not autistic, but I guarantee that at least some users/readers of this site are autistic. What's your point? Give it a rest already.

Panos wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Panos wrote:

Nalod wrote:Rainman pile on after a bad stretch. Drunk uncle happy.
Give up on him after 5 games where he played with the Groin thing. Smooth.
His plus 5 last night was actually pretty good. His dunk attempt actually spurred the team to a lead.
One of the few knicks that can actually have a good game without scoring. If you see the game you know what Im talking about.
If your boxscore reading, it looks bad. If you saw his penetrations were amped up and he had a few great passes because of it.
Players that are trying to play out of a comfort zone sometimes do this. Its called uneven progress.
Frank played with a different level of aggression last night. You don't start dunking on 7footers over night. I love that he tried it.
He is taking it to the rim over those last 5 games.

Does this mean we don't try to improve? Of course not. Just not after a bad shooting night.

0-8, but his *missed* dunk spurred the team on?
My, how far low the bar has fallen. Do you realize how desperate that sounds?
Did we give Charles Smith credit for "trying" when he missed 4 layups against the Bulls?

Team built a lead. Frank and Mitch were positive 5. Know who else was positive? Nobody. He goes o-8 and The second unit did real well in the second period.
Dotson got hot. Few games ago he was anyting but. How it goes. Did you see the dunk attempt? It was in traffic and would have posterized Dwight Howard.
Our little Passive Frenchie is growing up. Was it a Charles smith moment? Hardly.

Frank played 12 minutes. He is wearing arm sleaves now? Maybe he has an injury or the groin again? He was plus 5 in his brief time. Defense matters.
Whose name calling BTW? "Rainman" and "Drunk Uncle" are thread descriptors.

Frank went after KP. Clearly a foul right there. Nobody is crowning him a star but how do you not root for this 21 year old.

Thread descriptors? WTF does that mean? You call knicks1825 Rainman in every thread. It's implying he is autistic. I have no idea if he is or is not autistic, but I guarantee that at least some users/readers of this site are autistic. What's your point? Give it a rest already.

I'm kind of in Panos's camp re giving it a rest on Rainman. Besides I think rainman had aspergers and was really, really smart so it's a misplaced insult to boot

That said, i understand Nalod's frustration with knicks1248 incessant negativity

Nalod wrote:who didn’t love Rainman?
His redundant automatic responses were cute.
I don’t now if Knicks 1248 is autistic or not. But his redundant crack head lazy make shyt up SOMETIME responses are worthy.
Note when he don’t, I don’t call the posts with that kind of response.

As for Drunk Uncle,, those too are responses. There are lots of things I dont't agree with and don't respond to. Well thought opinions with facts are interesting regardless of agreement or not. If you rant the obvious, offer no insight, suggest incomplete thoughtless fictional moves, and don't do any leg work then "Drunk uncle" applies. Im sorry, do we have a support group in sympathy of "drunk uncles" here also?

Nalod wrote:

Nalod wrote:who didn’t love Rainman?
His redundant automatic responses were cute.
I don’t now if Knicks 1248 is autistic or not. But his redundant crack head lazy make shyt up SOMETIME responses are worthy.
Note when he don’t, I don’t call the posts with that kind of response.

As for Drunk Uncle,, those too are responses. There are lots of things I dont't agree with and don't respond to. Well thought opinions with facts are interesting regardless of agreement or not. If you rant the obvious, offer no insight, suggest incomplete thoughtless fictional moves, and don't do any leg work then "Drunk uncle" applies. Im sorry, do we have a support group in sympathy of "drunk uncles" here also?

nykshaknbake wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Nalod wrote:who didn’t love Rainman?
His redundant automatic responses were cute.
I don’t now if Knicks 1248 is autistic or not. But his redundant crack head lazy make shyt up SOMETIME responses are worthy.
Note when he don’t, I don’t call the posts with that kind of response.

As for Drunk Uncle,, those too are responses. There are lots of things I dont't agree with and don't respond to. Well thought opinions with facts are interesting regardless of agreement or not. If you rant the obvious, offer no insight, suggest incomplete thoughtless fictional moves, and don't do any leg work then "Drunk uncle" applies. Im sorry, do we have a support group in sympathy of "drunk uncles" here also?

Your war with him really makes you seem like a jackass. He doesn't always have the most cogent ideas but I've not seen him treat you the way you treat him.

Sometimes he makes me fell like a jack ass. He disrespects with his post content. Making shyt up like he in the locker room. Phuch that noise.

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/jcmacrinba/status/1221167737591992320?s=21

Click here to view the Tweet

Think I'd rather debate whether MitchRob dunking 6 times and fouling out can be considered a 'good game'.

Missed dunks.... it's come to this. LMAO

[Insert clip of Louie Orr missing the dunk off the front of the rim while Hubie sits and shakes his head]

makes perfect sense to be frustrated with his offensive development

Makes no sense to hate him or not see that he can contribute to winning basketball

NYKBocker wrote:How can you not like this guy?

We all like him. Everyone likes him.

Sambakick wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:How can you not like this guy?

We all like him. Everyone likes him.

NYKBocker wrote:

Sambakick wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:How can you not like this guy?

We all like him. Everyone likes him.

Then you haven't been paying attention on this board.