StarksEwing1 wrote:NYKBocker wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Mcgruder just blew past Frank for pass to Whiteside. Again Frank great team defense not as good man to man. Take your blinders off
I don't understand this thinking. Steph Curry is a knockdown 3 point shooter. When he misses does that mean we should take the blinders off as well?
Every player will get beat defensively. You have to look at the larger body or work and do it honestly.
Yeah I didn’t understand that comment. Even the best defenders I’ve seen get beat sometimes. Impossible not to
Frank gets beat man to man more than sometimes. He is NOT a lock down defender yet. Excellent team defender. Someone disagrees with your opinion and automatically "he" is a hater. Get over it.
BigRedDog wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:NYKBocker wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Mcgruder just blew past Frank for pass to Whiteside. Again Frank great team defense not as good man to man. Take your blinders off
I don't understand this thinking. Steph Curry is a knockdown 3 point shooter. When he misses does that mean we should take the blinders off as well?
Every player will get beat defensively. You have to look at the larger body or work and do it honestly.
Yeah I didn’t understand that comment. Even the best defenders I’ve seen get beat sometimes. Impossible not to
Frank gets beat man to man more than sometimes. He is NOT a lock down defender yet. Excellent team defender. Someone disagrees with your opinion and automatically "he" is a hater. Get over it.
Did I say you were a hater?
LivingLegend wrote:Frank
Timmy - just because (Ideally Knox is in starting 5) and Timmy is shipped to Turkey
Dotson
Mario
Kanter - just becauseBaker -- at least Ron will kill himself or someone with effort while he is out there
Trier
Knox
Lance
Vonleh
Tired of Burke style of play and Timmy is a knucklehead....Kanter getting tired of him as well (always a step late to spot on D) and no rim protection (at all)
Mudiay - meh
Lance would be hard=pressed to find minutes on any other team in League
Baker is a joke out there offensively.He does NOTHING on offense. He is a high school kid playing in the NBA. Worse than Lance out there. We are playing 3 on 5 basketball. He also commits these stupid hustle plays where he fights over a screen 30' from the basket, commits a foul when we are in the penalty.
StarksEwing1 wrote:BigRedDog wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:NYKBocker wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Mcgruder just blew past Frank for pass to Whiteside. Again Frank great team defense not as good man to man. Take your blinders off
I don't understand this thinking. Steph Curry is a knockdown 3 point shooter. When he misses does that mean we should take the blinders off as well?
Every player will get beat defensively. You have to look at the larger body or work and do it honestly.
Yeah I didn’t understand that comment. Even the best defenders I’ve seen get beat sometimes. Impossible not to
Frank gets beat man to man more than sometimes. He is NOT a lock down defender yet. Excellent team defender. Someone disagrees with your opinion and automatically "he" is a hater. Get over it.
Did I say you were a hater?
That wasn't directed to you, sorry, Waltlongmire wrote that in the next post after yours but he didn't quote you in his post
knicks1248 wrote:Houston is willing to give up 4 1st rounders for jimmyhttp://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25083...
Reminds me of the knicks back in the 90's
Lol Minnesota would be foolish not to take that deal As long as the 4 first rounders start in 2 years from now... rockets will be on the decline by then.
fitzfarm wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Houston is willing to give up 4 1st rounders for jimmyhttp://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25083...
Reminds me of the knicks back in the 90's
Lol Minnesota would be foolish not to take that deal As long as the 4 first rounders start in 2 years from now... rockets will be on the decline by then.
Yeah, but they're also 2 years apart each because of the Sepphian(sp?) rule.
4 first rounders over 8 years. And they'll likely be protection too.
Knickoftime wrote:fitzfarm wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Houston is willing to give up 4 1st rounders for jimmyhttp://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25083...
Reminds me of the knicks back in the 90's
Lol Minnesota would be foolish not to take that deal As long as the 4 first rounders start in 2 years from now... rockets will be on the decline by then.
Yeah, but they're also 2 years apart each because of the Sepphian(sp?) rule.
4 first rounders over 8 years. And they'll likely be protection too.
They need to move him and get something for him. I don't think they get a better offer.
Knickoftime wrote:fitzfarm wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Houston is willing to give up 4 1st rounders for jimmyhttp://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25083...
Reminds me of the knicks back in the 90's
Lol Minnesota would be foolish not to take that deal As long as the 4 first rounders start in 2 years from now... rockets will be on the decline by then.
Yeah, but they're also 2 years apart each because of the Sepphian(sp?) rule.
4 first rounders over 8 years. And they'll likely be protection too.
Houston has no intention's of rebuilding anytime soon, and if he gets ugly down the road they will have enough assets to make other trades to get 1st rounders back.
knicks1248 wrote:Knickoftime wrote:fitzfarm wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Houston is willing to give up 4 1st rounders for jimmyhttp://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25083...
Reminds me of the knicks back in the 90's
Lol Minnesota would be foolish not to take that deal As long as the 4 first rounders start in 2 years from now... rockets will be on the decline by then.
Yeah, but they're also 2 years apart each because of the Sepphian(sp?) rule.
4 first rounders over 8 years. And they'll likely be protection too.
Houston has no intention's of rebuilding anytime soon, and if he gets ugly down the road they will have enough assets to make other trades to get 1st rounders back.
My point was that negatively impacts the value for Minnesota.
