Knicks · Next 10 games (page 3)
jrodmc wrote:telling the truth of what happened is hate?martin wrote:jrodmc wrote:martin wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Marv wrote:really guys? spurs and trailblazers are terrible as are aforementioned nets. 3 W's there. i see our upset coming over pacers.I can't see our backcourt keeping McCollum and Lillard in check. I can't see the Knicks beating the Spurs ever really
Portland game will all be about who is the worst SF/PF defender off the bench, Melo or Knox
Unless medical miracles happen with Pau Gasol, Melo will probably still be starting. Pick another hate comparison. Maybe the starting forward with most pathetic vertical?
Starting forward who will do his best Getting Owned By Hibbert at the rim impression?
Redundant semantics = hate
In basketball, goaltending is the violation of interfering with the ball while it is on its way to the basket and it is (a) in a downward flight, (b) when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder, and (c) not touching the rim.
Knicksfan wrote:Its sad when 32 wins would be a vast improvement but also would be unlikely.
remember when the idea of that was unacceptable 
SupremeCommander wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Its sad when 32 wins would be a vast improvement but also would be unlikely.remember when the idea of that was unacceptable
That's what kills me, both Fisher and JH were fired after 31 and 32 win seasons.
Hell, woodson was fired after 37 wins, and he had a injury riddle roster for 3 quarters of that season.
IMO you should be able to get 30 wins off of hard work and effort alone, another 7 to 10 off of good coaching (close games)..
SupremeCommander wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Its sad when 32 wins would be a vast improvement but also would be unlikely.remember when the idea of that was unacceptable
When you come from 17 wins and don't add "Stars" the expectation reality is really what it is. The pattern is FO/coaches/players/summer league are all hype. I don't care what FO says. I don't care what coaches say. They are all positive and should be. When Vegas lays the odds preseason that's where the reality hits. You dont' sell tickets by saying you'll win 25 games. You sell tickets on hope, and the entertainment value. Im not just watching wins and losses. Im watching competitive games. If not, Im tuning out. Im watching Fiba Frank evolve, Smith struggle and perhaps elevate, Mitch grab the ball halfway up the backboard and dunk it! The team that had no closers last year at least try with Randle and Morris. Im watching Knox and the others "Good, bad and the Ugly".
Knicks are not "accountable" to me. Nobody puts a gun to my head and makes me watch the game. What I wont' do is get mad.
StarksEwing1 wrote:jrodmc wrote:telling the truth of what happened is hate?martin wrote:jrodmc wrote:martin wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Marv wrote:really guys? spurs and trailblazers are terrible as are aforementioned nets. 3 W's there. i see our upset coming over pacers.I can't see our backcourt keeping McCollum and Lillard in check. I can't see the Knicks beating the Spurs ever really
Portland game will all be about who is the worst SF/PF defender off the bench, Melo or Knox
Unless medical miracles happen with Pau Gasol, Melo will probably still be starting. Pick another hate comparison. Maybe the starting forward with most pathetic vertical?
Starting forward who will do his best Getting Owned By Hibbert at the rim impression?
Redundant semantics = hate
In basketball, goaltending is the violation of interfering with the ball while it is on its way to the basket and it is (a) in a downward flight, (b) when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder, and (c) not touching the rim.
pathetic vertical and getting owned by Hibbert is redundant.
Also, if you watch the replay, it was a goal tend. But carry on.
knicks1248 wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Knicksfan wrote:Its sad when 32 wins would be a vast improvement but also would be unlikely.remember when the idea of that was unacceptable
That's what kills me, both Fisher and JH were fired after 31 and 32 win seasons.
Hell, woodson was fired after 37 wins, and he had a injury riddle roster for 3 quarters of that season.
IMO you should be able to get 30 wins off of hard work and effort alone, another 7 to 10 off of good coaching (close games)..
Woodson was not fired, he was not rehired when Phil bought his triangle to town. By most accounts not a fan, including myself was dissatisfied with the job he did. New regime.
Fish was dysfunctional. Phil's first choice Kerr was a good one. Walton was not coming and he hired Fish who was not prepared to be head coach for many reasons.
JH was let go because because MIlls and Perry were wanted their guy. JH let go might have been a concession for KP. Bud might have been the better choice but we don't know all the details. He might have made demands that were not acceptable at that moment to the people in the room at that time.
There is a reason why Mitch was taken in the second round. He needed lots of time.
knicks1248 wrote:We are a pathetic run team..We may go 0-10...
Fizdale is just a really bad coach..
I think they run... but they are not sure where to run.
They will learn... give them time... 
knicks1248 wrote:jrodmc wrote:Bump. Fiz didn't even live to see 0-10.Although sitting on a beach counting Jimmie's millions and having probably the next two years off paid is a nice way to live.
A stress-free Christmas and New Year's!So are Mills and Perry both on the clock in the next 10 games? I cannot believe Jimmie would fire Miller, even if he loses every game and sheehits his pants on the sidelines...
I think the team knew he went from Head coach to substitute teach
Is he good enough to be a punchbag for your fire-somebody posts? 