Refs, no bias for Miami, right?
Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he’d get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.
Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
Knicksfan wrote:Refs, no bias for Miami, right?
I listened to the Miami feed for a bit when my MSG feed was stuttering, and I really appreciate Breen, being a national announcer, is much more in practice with being partial. Those Miami announcers were so homerish it was annoying.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he’d get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.
Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
You at least have to admit that the 2 PG pairing (at least with Rose and Quickley) has looked damn good, at least this game.
You can tell we watched a shit ton of film
Playing like crap and still pulling away....
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, hed get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
You stated your opinion. Didn't make you right, or my thought insane.
Rose being a lil sloppy this half but we still in this
joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he’d get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.
Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
You at least have to admit that the 2 PG pairing (at least with Rose and Quickley) has looked damn good, at least this game.
Pairing IQ with another ball handler is an EXCELLENT idea. He needs it. Same reason I wouldn't start him either. He is not ready to run an offense.
Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, hed get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
You stated your opinion. Didn't make you right, or my thought insane.
Payton and IQ will not start a game this season unless Bullock, Rivers, Burke all hurt. So we can say in the very least that the coaching staff thinks your idea is not a good one.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Martin, do you still think it's "insane" for IQ to slide to the SG?
The premise was to start him next to Payton at SG, so yeah, it's insane but nice try
Incorrect. My premise was to get a guy that can shoot to play SG. It was an honest thought, and rather than address it as such you get all snarky. I hardly see it as that insane. He did play SG in college after all.
I've addressed it twice already in the original thread.
martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he’d get overwhelmed at SG
martin wrote:Panos wrote:martin wrote:joec32033 wrote:martin wrote:Panos wrote:Question: why can't IQ start at the 2, and slide to PG when Payton sits? Doesn't he give us that shooting we need at the SG position?
Very small defensively, he;d get overwhelmed at SG
IQ and Payton can switch on defense. And it isnt like IQ tiny. He may be on she short side but his reach is long.
Knicks have 2 main PGs on the team and you are proposing they play at the same time... Im out
I suppose you're going to perpetuate the myth of Frank as an SG or SF that can't shoot?
We have 4 on the team (or 5 PGs, if you count Rivers, let's not count him, and say 4) before and after the trade.
I don't understand why this team is allergic to actually having a SHOOTER play SG since like Allan Houston
No, I'm going with some common sense, straight forward take that says Frank and DJSr were out of the rotation. For me Rivers is a combo guy who had some ball handling responsibilities but really isn't a PG on the team.
Elf and IQ are the main PGs on the team before this trade. They haven't played substantial minutes at all together and playing them at the same time as a part of a rotation would be insane
FYI. Quickley the SG is 1 for 7. If that matters. 
Quick ism't redeeming all my whining.
