Knicks · When Randle sat and the 4 minutes of Frank.......... (page 1)
RJ Barrett gave you a glimpse of the future. In a league that is wing dominant we saw what a brick shithouse this 20 year old will bestow upon the league in the net few year.
But where our wonderful Briggs blurted about “Thibs lost the game”, and then we we win 5 in a row, Thibs is simply coaching his ass off. HE mostly presses the right buttons. Last 5 games Elf’s minutes are down and he his playing very well. Rose is back on stride is why.
Other than Reek, who does not love that frank comes in, makes a big boy Three and take it right to hoop? Randle was on the bench and the team EXTENDED THE LEAD FROM 4 TO 12.......
Not Frank. Not RJ and the future playmaker of the team, and not anyone player. IT was KNICKS!!!!
Thibs is pulling shit. IQ is not on he sits. Next man up. Frank on call and contributed. I can’t tell you his future but he is not out of Thibs mind. At least not yet.
This season is not over so I’m not talking about next year.
But if you want to take about something, it’s was RJ running the offense in place of Burks on the second unit and it looked FanFuckingTastic!!!
TPercy wrote:Agreed. I really think we should keep running staggered rotations where RJ gets to run 2nd unit. The ball just moves a lot better and most teams bench can't handle him. Nets did this a lot with Kyrie/Harden up until 4th Q so it could work for us.
Its good to prune a forest so other trees can grow. Its why I’m not so set on both Bullock and Burks returning as I’d like to see internal growth. Lets just say that both of them have hit their peak and its lovely really, but eyes on a bigger piece. I can’t tell you who that is as much I could have told you that Reggie and Burks would have stepped up as they have. OR that Randle would be at this level, and RJ at age 20 is this steady and expanding his repertoire at the same time.
I don’t imagine us bringing 4 rookies next year and thinking we can develop them with roles for Knox, Frank and Obi as well. The future is wide open............
Nalod wrote:Now that I got your attention.......
RJ Barrett gave you a glimpse of the future. In a league that is wing dominant we saw what a brick shithouse this 20 year old will bestow upon the league in the net few year.
But where our wonderful Briggs blurted about “Thibs lost the game”, and then we we win 5 in a row, Thibs is simply coaching his ass off. HE mostly presses the right buttons. Last 5 games Elf’s minutes are down and he his playing very well. Rose is back on stride is why.
Other than Reek, who does not love that frank comes in, makes a big boy Three and take it right to hoop? Randle was on the bench and the team EXTENDED THE LEAD FROM 4 TO 12.......
Not Frank. Not RJ and the future playmaker of the team, and not anyone player. IT was KNICKS!!!!
Thibs is pulling shit. IQ is not on he sits. Next man up. Frank on call and contributed. I can’t tell you his future but he is not out of Thibs mind. At least not yet.
This season is not over so I’m not talking about next year.
But if you want to take about something, it’s was RJ running the offense in place of Burks on the second unit and it looked FanFuckingTastic!!!
Hardaway was able to push IQ around. He backed him down for a couple of easy baskets. Enter Frank, whose 6'6" and solid frame didn't give Tim the right of way hat he had. There is a place for Frank, Knox and Obi. More situational substitutions will rest our first unit, and build up these players for defense, rebounding and offense, when we use them.
Nalod wrote:Now that I got your attention.......
RJ Barrett gave you a glimpse of the future. In a league that is wing dominant we saw what a brick shithouse this 20 year old will bestow upon the league in the net few year.
But where our wonderful Briggs blurted about ;Thibs lost the game, and then we we win 5 in a row, Thibs is simply coaching his ass off. HE mostly presses the right buttons. Last 5 games Elf;s minutes are down and he his playing very well. Rose is back on stride is why.
Other than Reek, who does not love that frank comes in, makes a big boy Three and take it right to hoop? Randle was on the bench and the team EXTENDED THE LEAD FROM 4 TO 12.......
Not Frank. Not RJ and the future playmaker of the team, and not anyone player. IT was KNICKS!!!!
Thibs is pulling shit. IQ is not on he sits. Next man up. Frank on call and contributed. I can;t tell you his future but he is not out of Thibs mind. At least not yet.
This season is not over so I;m not talking about next year.
But if you want to take about something, it;s was RJ running the offense in place of Burks on the second unit and it looked FanFuckingTastic!!!
I'm thinking more Hodor. Just says the same things over and over.
Panos wrote:Nalod wrote:Now that I got your attention.......
RJ Barrett gave you a glimpse of the future. In a league that is wing dominant we saw what a brick shithouse this 20 year old will bestow upon the league in the net few year.
But where our wonderful Briggs blurted about ;Thibs lost the game, and then we we win 5 in a row, Thibs is simply coaching his ass off. HE mostly presses the right buttons. Last 5 games Elf;s minutes are down and he his playing very well. Rose is back on stride is why.
Other than Reek, who does not love that frank comes in, makes a big boy Three and take it right to hoop? Randle was on the bench and the team EXTENDED THE LEAD FROM 4 TO 12.......
Not Frank. Not RJ and the future playmaker of the team, and not anyone player. IT was KNICKS!!!!
Thibs is pulling shit. IQ is not on he sits. Next man up. Frank on call and contributed. I can;t tell you his future but he is not out of Thibs mind. At least not yet.
This season is not over so I;m not talking about next year.
But if you want to take about something, it;s was RJ running the offense in place of Burks on the second unit and it looked FanFuckingTastic!!!
I'm thinking more Hodor. Just says the same things over and over.
But if you hold the door, you’ll realize there are deeper meanings.
Sangfroid wrote:
Hardaway was able to push IQ around. He backed him down for a couple of easy baskets. Enter Frank, whose 6'6" and solid frame didn't give Tim the right of way hat he had. There is a place for Frank, Knox and Obi. More situational substitutions will rest our first unit, and build up these players for defense, rebounding and offense, when we use them.
Correct. So it is maddening that it has taken 50 games for Thibs to figure out that Frank is the right substitution in such situations. How many times did we see the likes of Kyrie, Dame or Steph totally torch us? Now, Elf is a decent defender and these guys are good, they were going to get theirs regardless. But having Frank disrupt their flow could have meant us winning a few more games and getting a high playoff berth. Which seems to have been the team's goal as opposed to tanking for Cade this season.
ESOMKnicks wrote:Sangfroid wrote:
Hardaway was able to push IQ around. He backed him down for a couple of easy baskets. Enter Frank, whose 6'6" and solid frame didn't give Tim the right of way hat he had. There is a place for Frank, Knox and Obi. More situational substitutions will rest our first unit, and build up these players for defense, rebounding and offense, when we use them.Correct. So it is maddening that it has taken 50 games for Thibs to figure out that Frank is the right substitution in such situations. How many times did we see the likes of Kyrie, Dame or Steph totally torch us? Now, Elf is a decent defender and these guys are good, they were going to get theirs regardless. But having Frank disrupt their flow could have meant us winning a few more games and getting a high playoff berth. Which seems to have been the team's goal as opposed to tanking for Cade this season.
Yeah, noone can shut down leagues top scorers, but if they are made just somewhat uncomfortable and hit just 5% less shots that could make a huge difference in the outcome of the game. Sometimes a single stop and a fastbreak can swing momentum
ESOMKnicks wrote:like the same amount of time we lost with Frank shooting 0-4, 0-3, 0-5, 0-4Sangfroid wrote:
Hardaway was able to push IQ around. He backed him down for a couple of easy baskets. Enter Frank, whose 6'6" and solid frame didn't give Tim the right of way hat he had. There is a place for Frank, Knox and Obi. More situational substitutions will rest our first unit, and build up these players for defense, rebounding and offense, when we use them.Correct. So it is maddening that it has taken 50 games for Thibs to figure out that Frank is the right substitution in such situations. How many times did we see the likes of Kyrie, Dame or Steph totally torch us? Now, Elf is a decent defender and these guys are good, they were going to get theirs regardless. But having Frank disrupt their flow could have meant us winning a few more games and getting a high playoff berth. Which seems to have been the team's goal as opposed to tanking for Cade this season.
Considering you think we should trade Randle to get KP back I suspect you find a lot of things maddening
Allanfan20 wrote:Panos wrote:Nalod wrote:Now that I got your attention.......
RJ Barrett gave you a glimpse of the future. In a league that is wing dominant we saw what a brick shithouse this 20 year old will bestow upon the league in the net few year.
But where our wonderful Briggs blurted about ;Thibs lost the game, and then we we win 5 in a row, Thibs is simply coaching his ass off. HE mostly presses the right buttons. Last 5 games Elf;s minutes are down and he his playing very well. Rose is back on stride is why.
Other than Reek, who does not love that frank comes in, makes a big boy Three and take it right to hoop? Randle was on the bench and the team EXTENDED THE LEAD FROM 4 TO 12.......
Not Frank. Not RJ and the future playmaker of the team, and not anyone player. IT was KNICKS!!!!
Thibs is pulling shit. IQ is not on he sits. Next man up. Frank on call and contributed. I can;t tell you his future but he is not out of Thibs mind. At least not yet.
This season is not over so I;m not talking about next year.
But if you want to take about something, it;s was RJ running the offense in place of Burks on the second unit and it looked FanFuckingTastic!!!
I'm thinking more Hodor. Just says the same things over and over.
But if you hold the door, you’ll realize there are deeper meanings.
HOLD THE FRANK!
HOLD THE FRANK!
HOLD FRANK!
HOFRANK!
HOFRANK!
fishmike wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:like the same amount of time we lost with Frank shooting 0-4, 0-3, 0-5, 0-4Sangfroid wrote:
Hardaway was able to push IQ around. He backed him down for a couple of easy baskets. Enter Frank, whose 6'6" and solid frame didn't give Tim the right of way hat he had. There is a place for Frank, Knox and Obi. More situational substitutions will rest our first unit, and build up these players for defense, rebounding and offense, when we use them.Correct. So it is maddening that it has taken 50 games for Thibs to figure out that Frank is the right substitution in such situations. How many times did we see the likes of Kyrie, Dame or Steph totally torch us? Now, Elf is a decent defender and these guys are good, they were going to get theirs regardless. But having Frank disrupt their flow could have meant us winning a few more games and getting a high playoff berth. Which seems to have been the team's goal as opposed to tanking for Cade this season.
Considering you think we should trade Randle to get KP back I suspect you find a lot of things maddening
Point-by-point:
1) The discussion was revolving about "situational" substitutions. I.e., bringing Frank into the game for a specific purpose of defending a hot opposing guard. It was not about his offensive contribution, that one is a well-known issue.
2) In games this season where Frank played over 5 minutes, the Knicks are actually 10-5. That's a 67% winning percentage. The Knicks' overall record is 30-26, or 53% winning percentage. Now, maybe there are other factors in play if you drill down, but at least on first look the Knicks win more when Frank plays meaningful minutes
3) In one of the 5 losses, Frank started the game, played 24 minutes and shot 5-7, scoring 13 points, so it wasn't one of those 0-4, 0-3, 0-5, 0-4 affairs
4) I did not advocate trading Randle for KP, it was Randle plus the two Mavs first rounders for KP. It is Porzingod we are talking about, you oughta show some respect, young man!
I don’t understand the convo to some how reconstruct and bring him back.
I’m content with our status and the notion that both teams have faired well form the trade. I don’t care if KP is happy or not. Naturally I prefer the pick we own of theirs rises in value so for this year it I hope we rise. But really its out of our control. Thibs and the rise of Randle and RJ with a few games over .500 at this juncture of the season is the important part.
Nalod wrote:KP either physically is limited or philosophically less to preserve his body has not fulfilled his “PorzinGOD” potential thus far. The rim protector and surge to the rim offensively is dialed back.
I don’t understand the convo to some how reconstruct and bring him back.
I’m content with our status and the notion that both teams have faired well form the trade. I don’t care if KP is happy or not. Naturally I prefer the pick we own of theirs rises in value so for this year it I hope we rise. But really its out of our control. Thibs and the rise of Randle and RJ with a few games over .500 at this juncture of the season is the important part.
You mean to say we trashed Mills and kicked him out for nothing?
From the looks of it, Dallas has not fared all that well with KP. Feels like there might be a conflict brewing between him and Luka. When Luka hit the impossible game winner vs Memphis, KP was the only Mav who did not congratulate him or express any emotion of joy. Not as easy being in the shadow of a great as he thought.
The Knicks are better off because at that point there was nowhere to go, but up.
ESOMKnicks wrote:Nalod wrote:KP either physically is limited or philosophically less to preserve his body has not fulfilled his “PorzinGOD” potential thus far. The rim protector and surge to the rim offensively is dialed back.
I don’t understand the convo to some how reconstruct and bring him back.
I’m content with our status and the notion that both teams have faired well form the trade. I don’t care if KP is happy or not. Naturally I prefer the pick we own of theirs rises in value so for this year it I hope we rise. But really its out of our control. Thibs and the rise of Randle and RJ with a few games over .500 at this juncture of the season is the important part.You mean to say we trashed Mills and kicked him out for nothing?
From the looks of it, Dallas has not fared all that well with KP. Feels like there might be a conflict brewing between him and Luka. When Luka hit the impossible game winner vs Memphis, KP was the only Mav who did not congratulate him or express any emotion of joy. Not as easy being in the shadow of a great as he thought.
The Knicks are better off because at that point there was nowhere to go, but up.
Not saying we trashed Mills for no reason. I’m saying I wouldn’t trade for KP.
I don’t care what KP does or does not do except if it matters for our pick.
Now, should he have talent that shot? Yeah. But a guy who instinctively will pass first did so to a 40% all star and with the slimiest of margins did not hesitate to do so, and because of that the shot was good!!!!!
Injuries and RJ and Bullock fouled out but good to see Thibs go with IQ and Frank. Funny, announcer had Payton coming in at first. To be fair they are calling the game remotely. Doris did go a little “bill Walton” on frank for his foul but outside of that I like the outcome.
Now if Frank had talent the shot and hit it all hell would have broken loose in the house of Reek1248.
BTW, its not “Game of Thrones” reference. Its when you make up shyt, it smells. If you let it go unnoticed it emboldens the creator. This site does very well over two decades because we don’t put up with it.
6 in a row!!! What a fun season this has turned into. don’t know where it goes but half the fun is getting there!
Nalod wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:Nalod wrote:KP either physically is limited or philosophically less to preserve his body has not fulfilled his “PorzinGOD” potential thus far. The rim protector and surge to the rim offensively is dialed back.
I don’t understand the convo to some how reconstruct and bring him back.
I’m content with our status and the notion that both teams have faired well form the trade. I don’t care if KP is happy or not. Naturally I prefer the pick we own of theirs rises in value so for this year it I hope we rise. But really its out of our control. Thibs and the rise of Randle and RJ with a few games over .500 at this juncture of the season is the important part.You mean to say we trashed Mills and kicked him out for nothing?
From the looks of it, Dallas has not fared all that well with KP. Feels like there might be a conflict brewing between him and Luka. When Luka hit the impossible game winner vs Memphis, KP was the only Mav who did not congratulate him or express any emotion of joy. Not as easy being in the shadow of a great as he thought.
The Knicks are better off because at that point there was nowhere to go, but up.
Not saying we trashed Mills for no reason. I’m saying I wouldn’t trade for KP.
I don’t care what KP does or does not do except if it matters for our pick.
**** KP and the horse upon which he rides.
Knickfury11 wrote:Nalod wrote:ESOMKnicks wrote:Nalod wrote:KP either physically is limited or philosophically less to preserve his body has not fulfilled his “PorzinGOD” potential thus far. The rim protector and surge to the rim offensively is dialed back.
I don’t understand the convo to some how reconstruct and bring him back.
I’m content with our status and the notion that both teams have faired well form the trade. I don’t care if KP is happy or not. Naturally I prefer the pick we own of theirs rises in value so for this year it I hope we rise. But really its out of our control. Thibs and the rise of Randle and RJ with a few games over .500 at this juncture of the season is the important part.You mean to say we trashed Mills and kicked him out for nothing?
From the looks of it, Dallas has not fared all that well with KP. Feels like there might be a conflict brewing between him and Luka. When Luka hit the impossible game winner vs Memphis, KP was the only Mav who did not congratulate him or express any emotion of joy. Not as easy being in the shadow of a great as he thought.
The Knicks are better off because at that point there was nowhere to go, but up.
Not saying we trashed Mills for no reason. I’m saying I wouldn’t trade for KP.
I don’t care what KP does or does not do except if it matters for our pick.**** KP and the horse upon which he rides.
F@%k his goddam horse.
Kemet wrote:Frank's defense and Quickley's offense should've been running our 2nd-unit lineup a long time ago, December .. the two young-guards would've created a dynamic chemistry together by now.
Nice thought, but we cant have a backcourt for long, where only one player can be counted on to produce offensively. We've tried that with Prigs, Calderon, Baker. Doesnt move the needle enough.
Frank has the proper role right now, situational PT. Considering his consistent lack of production on offense. Frank should be grateful to Thibs that he's still finding minutes for him. Especially since he's got two way players ahead of him. Frank shows he can average double digits on offense. Without heavy minutes. Quite sure the PT will be there for him. Believe thats all Frank ever had to do, since getting drafted.