The trades they propose are never realistic. Either they are getting a useful player for Fournier's contract and a couple of picks, or they are giving up the farm, or other reason why it doesn't make sense. In this article, its proposed to get PG13, and we are to be giving up Randle, RJ and picks. So, it's supposing that were thin at the forward position and need more size, so he proposes to give up 2 forwards to get 1? How does that make any sense? Wouldn't it be better to give up some depth at guard for depth at forward?
https://empiresportsmedia.com/new-york-k...
but look what you just did…not only did you clicked and read it but now sharing this ludicrous trade proposal.
They win
Swishfm3 wrote:but look what you just did…not only did you clicked and read it but now sharing this ludicrous trade proposal. They win
Panos has to work on his hate.
