NYStateOfMind wrote:One of the dumbest decisions of Game 1: you have your best defender(OG) on Nesmith with around 12.9 seconds left up 3, so they immediately foul to around 12.4 seconds, gifting a 3-point lead cut to 1. If he hits a miracle 3 so be it, you kill some time, and at worst, it is tied. And punk Hali doesn't have the time to shoot that broken play BS luck shot.Also, is it really all OG's fault if he gets a tight pass on the floor instead of an alley-oop, when JB knows about his hands? Earlier, they overthrew him on a breakaway dunk. Either wins this game, not to mention missed FTs. Lastly, I believe KAT was 3 on 2 when he just stopped and waited to be fouled. JB should have been shooting clutch FTs. But, KAT had an open player to pass to, to kill more time, or an easy lay-up or dunk. Don't play to hold on, play to kill. See it in football all the time. Call it prevent-win defense. Low IQ end to this game, on the players and the coach. Where was Deuce when things got out of hand? He led us to a 16pt lead. Deuce over Hart would have made sense; he can defend and score. Hart kept making poor defensive decisions on Obi and is not the guy you want when you need a score.
This is a must-win. However, I'm not sure it matters, as NO ONE is beating OKC.
WHAT?
I don't do cheerleader pics. If so, they would be Knicks' women & cheerleaders, lol. What to what part? The OKC thing?
ToddTT wrote:NYStateOfMind wrote:One of the dumbest decisions of Game 1: you have your best defender(OG) on Nesmith with around 12.9 seconds left up 3, so they immediately foul to around 12.4 seconds, gifting a 3-point lead cut to 1. If he hits a miracle 3 so be it, you kill some time, and at worst, it is tied. And punk Hali doesn't have the time to shoot that broken play BS luck shot.Also, is it really all OG's fault if he gets a tight pass on the floor instead of an alley-oop, when JB knows about his hands? Earlier, they overthrew him on a breakaway dunk. Either wins this game, not to mention missed FTs. Lastly, I believe KAT was 3 on 2 when he just stopped and waited to be fouled. JB should have been shooting clutch FTs. But, KAT had an open player to pass to, to kill more time, or an easy lay-up or dunk. Don't play to hold on, play to kill. See it in football all the time. Call it prevent-win defense. Low IQ end to this game, on the players and the coach. Where was Deuce when things got out of hand? He led us to a 16pt lead. Deuce over Hart would have made sense; he can defend and score. Hart kept making poor defensive decisions on Obi and is not the guy you want when you need a score.
This is a must-win. However, I'm not sure it matters, as NO ONE is beating OKC.
WHAT?
NYStateOfMind wrote:I don't do cheerleader pics. If so, they would be Knicks' women & cheerleaders, lol. What to what part? The OKC thing?ToddTT wrote:NYStateOfMind wrote:One of the dumbest decisions of Game 1: you have your best defender(OG) on Nesmith with around 12.9 seconds left up 3, so they immediately foul to around 12.4 seconds, gifting a 3-point lead cut to 1. If he hits a miracle 3 so be it, you kill some time, and at worst, it is tied. And punk Hali doesn't have the time to shoot that broken play BS luck shot.Also, is it really all OG's fault if he gets a tight pass on the floor instead of an alley-oop, when JB knows about his hands? Earlier, they overthrew him on a breakaway dunk. Either wins this game, not to mention missed FTs. Lastly, I believe KAT was 3 on 2 when he just stopped and waited to be fouled. JB should have been shooting clutch FTs. But, KAT had an open player to pass to, to kill more time, or an easy lay-up or dunk. Don't play to hold on, play to kill. See it in football all the time. Call it prevent-win defense. Low IQ end to this game, on the players and the coach. Where was Deuce when things got out of hand? He led us to a 16pt lead. Deuce over Hart would have made sense; he can defend and score. Hart kept making poor defensive decisions on Obi and is not the guy you want when you need a score.
This is a must-win. However, I'm not sure it matters, as NO ONE is beating OKC.
WHAT?
I was just reacting to your blatant violation of UltimateKnicks boldface guidelines. 
Papabear Says
The last game I just checked out the score until about 2 and a half minutes to go and then I thought it was safe to turn on the game and all hell broke loose. When ever I turn on the game we are ahead and then they start loosing. Maybe I should not turn on the game tonight.
Papabear wrote:Papabear SaysThe last game I just checked out the score until about 2 and a half minutes to go and then I thought it was safe to turn on the game and all hell broke loose. When ever I turn on the game we are ahead and then they start loosing. Maybe I should not turn on the game tonight.
Hmmmm. What if you try pointing the antenna in the opposite direction?
This is a great test for the Knicks. Great teams can win a series when they fall behind. Knicks have yet to do that in the Brunson era. It’s fun to stay ahead or tied the whole way but this is where legends are made. Think of all the series that LeBron fell down 3-2 and still won.
Please win this MUDDAFUGGA
martin wrote:
Jesus the ROBERT RANDLE CURSE on Friday night —— living dangerously Martin.
ToddTT wrote:If we lose today stick a fork in us.
A fork or maybe a wooden stake to the heart.
Panos wrote:Number one issue Knicks need to address tonight is a plan when JB is getting doubled, or beat up while he's simply bringing the ball up. Cannot have him struggling just to advance the ball and have possible turnovers. Need another ballhandler to step up. Looking at you Mikal.
Why even start with Jalen - get him off the ball +70% of the time but I guess than you have to find a way to get to him after crossing 1/2 court 
Alpha1971 wrote:Play Wright on Nesmith.
Been wanting some Delon for 2 series —- he’s a legit defensive guard with size.
Meh offensively but can get ball over 1/2 court and knock down an open 3.
GustavBahler wrote:Im hoping for a blowout, something decisive to get the team fired up. Also hope to see Shamet play, if the defense isnt getting the job done. Payne and Shamet were an effective tandem at times during the season. Not being so predictable, when it comes to the rotation might be what we need. We'll see.
If we lose this game, lets not try to take it out on each other. We all want to see our Knicks succeed.
You and 5M other Knick fans hoping for blowout 
Panos wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Im hoping for a blowout, something decisive to get the team fired up. Also hope to see Shamet play, if the defense isnt getting the job done. Payne and Shamet were an effective tandem at times during the season. Not being so predictable, when it comes to the rotation might be what we need. We'll see.
If we lose this game, lets not try to take it out on each other. We all want to see our Knicks succeed.
Let's not take it out on each other. Just take it out on Gustav! 
AGREED - this ones on Gustav (if we lose).
Alpha1971 wrote:Sleeping entirely thru this one. Knicks are 100 percent successful when I do. 50 percent when I watch only the last 2 minutes.
Haha - you must get so much enjoyment from this club.
martin wrote:KEEPCAMBYNY wrote:Mitch / Hukporti
Towns / Precious
Anunoby / Hart
Bridges / Deuce or Cam
Brunson / D-WrightWe could easily be running this lineup out there to help us keep pace with Indiana on both ends, but no... Thibs is going to stick to his 7-8 man rotation and let them tire our guys out again.
This is not reasonable though? GLeague level or vet min talent for a bunch of those guys.
Hukporti is literally coming off of surgery and we expect something?
Let him/us dream Martin.
BigDaddyG wrote:ToddTT wrote:Panos wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Im hoping for a blowout, something decisive to get the team fired up. Also hope to see Shamet play, if the defense isnt getting the job done. Payne and Shamet were an effective tandem at times during the season. Not being so predictable, when it comes to the rotation might be what we need. We'll see.
If we lose this game, lets not try to take it out on each other. We all want to see our Knicks succeed.
Let's not take it out on each other. Just take it out on Gustav!
Gustav’s mamma is so stupid, she stopped her car at a stop sign and is still waiting for it to turn green.
This is beneath you Bot. Your 'Yo Mama' jokes suck. Now get back to work and start posting some cheerleader pics.
Did someone say cheerleader pics?
ToddTT wrote:NYStateOfMind wrote:One of the dumbest decisions of Game 1: you have your best defender(OG) on Nesmith with around 12.9 seconds left up 3, so they immediately foul to around 12.4 seconds, gifting a 3-point lead cut to 1. If he hits a miracle 3 so be it, you kill some time, and at worst, it is tied. And punk Hali doesn't have the time to shoot that broken play BS luck shot.Also, is it really all OG's fault if he gets a tight pass on the floor instead of an alley-oop, when JB knows about his hands? Earlier, they overthrew him on a breakaway dunk. Either wins this game, not to mention missed FTs. Lastly, I believe KAT was 3 on 2 when he just stopped and waited to be fouled. JB should have been shooting clutch FTs. But, KAT had an open player to pass to, to kill more time, or an easy lay-up or dunk. Don't play to hold on, play to kill. See it in football all the time. Call it prevent-win defense. Low IQ end to this game, on the players and the coach. Where was Deuce when things got out of hand? He led us to a 16pt lead. Deuce over Hart would have made sense; he can defend and score. Hart kept making poor defensive decisions on Obi and is not the guy you want when you need a score.
This is a must-win. However, I'm not sure it matters, as NO ONE is beating OKC.
WHAT?
That was a lot there - hahaha.
Rumor on street Knicks entire staff spent past 1.5 days trying to show/teach Josh Hart to see both the ball and his man.
ToddTT wrote:
Sweet Jesus- VICTORY IS OURS
