Knicks · No Mitch, No Huk — now what? (page 20)

Don't get Mitch near this

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/Krisplashed/status/2104977184402149616?s=20

Click here to view the Tweet

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/JLEdwardsIII/status/2104977152747687957?s=20

Click here to view the Tweet

shinmen wrote:I would steer clear of Wiseman. Everything i read about him in the past is that he has a very low ball iq and is consistently missing assignments on defense. What we need is a good screen setter that can defend the rim and not be lost on a switch.
https://www.metroleague.org/why-is-james...

They are going to find out if Wiseman can actually play in a backup C role soon, if he sucks cut him and trade for a c.

Sometimes it’s bad, sometimes it’s good

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/knickfilmskool/status/2104998666004025678?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA

Click here to view the Tweet

martin wrote:Sometimes it’s bad, sometimes it’s good

Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/knickfilmskool/status/2104998666004025678?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA

Click here to view the Tweet

Yes.

Ironic knicks blow decades of starphuch free spending but in the age of this parity, CBA, with the Apron, they win a chip.

Huk got 3.5 from Philly. One year.
More than doubles his career earnings from his two year Knick Stint.
We might never see him in the nba again, perhaps europe or Austrailia is his future but for him he got his chip, and he got paid. Hate it happend but better now than a year ago.