"You are empowered to do justice. You are empowered to insure that this great justice system of ours works."
bigpimpin@ 6/14/2007 5:38 PM
"IF THE GLOVE does not fit you must ACQUIT."
NYK3@ 6/14/2007 6:35 PM
WHAT A FUCKING JOKE, OJ'S ASS SHOULD BE IN JAIL...HE'S A MURDERER
playa2@ 6/14/2007 6:42 PM
Im amazed how the public made up there minds before this evidence.
Who were those 2 guys with nicole simpson at the icecream parlor with suits on the day of the murders. Those guys are the ones who should be questioned.
NYK3@ 6/14/2007 6:46 PM
playa do you truly believe that OJ did not kill Nicole and Ron?
bigpimpin@ 6/14/2007 6:54 PM
How should he be in jail when he was found not guilty by the jury.
I just don't understand why people conclude that he is guilty when a not guilty verdict was rendered.
Are you saying the law is f'd up because a white man who supposedly killed two white people walked out the courtroom a free man?
It's the law you should be upset with not OJ.
Jot that down now.
NYK3@ 6/14/2007 7:05 PM
OJ killed 2 innocent people, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy
bigpimpin@ 6/14/2007 7:18 PM
Well put me down with The Dream Team (trial lawyers) and the twelve crazy members of the jury.
The gloves didn't fit dawg.
playa2@ 6/14/2007 8:45 PM
Man didn't the cop lying tell you anything. I still remember to this day what the cop said that was one of the 1st ones on the scene, he said" I've seen many murders in L.A and this looked like a professional hit."
OJ knows who did it, but he can't mess with those underworld dudes or tell on them.
The public just saw the case on the surface and never knew the seedy dealings OJ and his wife Nicole and Faye resnick was dealing with.
Don't forget to protect her self , faye resnick went and checked into a drug rehab after the murders. They were all druggies. IMHO Nicole messed over the wrong drug family or tried to get out of something she was involved in and they said NO !
[Edited by - playa2 on 15-06-2007 11:22]
NYK3@ 6/14/2007 9:06 PM
You guys can tell me all the crap you want till your blue in the face, I believe and will always believe OJ did it, he's a murdering scumbag and should rot in jail for the rest of his life
simrud@ 6/14/2007 9:13 PM
The man wrote a book about how he could have killed his wife, why would he do that if he did not kill her?
You guys are just sticking up for him cause you are black. I don't know what kind of prize you got when he walked away a free man, but last time I checked no black man ever won anything when OJ walked. The whole black/white drama around the case is such idiocy. Blacks did not win anything, and whits would not win anything if he was convicted either.
The only winner was OJ and loosers were his family, who would have lost regardless of the verdict as their lives were torn apart.
bigpimpin@ 6/14/2007 9:14 PM
Explain to me how a man with arthritis could viciously murder two healthy individuals without having a bruise, cut nor scratch on his body?
Explain to me how he could then walk into his plush home and their not be any blood on his carpet
Explain to me where all the blood that "would have been" in the Bronco went?
Explain to me why there was no murder weapon found nor was there any bloody clothes found?
bigpimpin@ 6/14/2007 9:15 PM
Why would he want to murder a woman he was in love with? The mother of two of his children? That doesn't make any sense to me.
This was clearly a mob hit.
simrud@ 6/14/2007 9:16 PM
Was not she cheating on him supposedly?
playa2@ 6/15/2007 6:39 AM
Posted by simrud:
Was not she cheating on him supposedly?
They weren't even married anymore, they were dating other people and were cordial friends. That guy would have kicked OJ's butt by himself , OJ's bad artritic knee's would collapse in a fight with a younger man.
Nobody ever arrest's hitmen , this is why they never looked for another killer in the case. Now how could you assume ONLY OJ as a detective without a trial and verdict?
[Edited by - playa2 on 15-06-2007 06:43]
Solace@ 6/15/2007 9:42 AM
Remember how the law works. You don't have to prove someone innocent. You just have to have reasonable doubt.
Did OJ do it? Maybe. It's been a long time, so I don't remember too many details of the case anymore. The jury felt there was enough room for doubt to let him free.
The whole idea is you'd rather let 10 guilty men go free than have one innocent in jail. While the system isn't perfect, it's better than most of the rest of the world.
