Posted by Allanfan20:
And for he record, it has nothing to do with gender equality. It just so happens that woman have more prime external sexual stimulators then men. It's how nature or God or both (Whichever you prefer) chose it to be. American and most European (I think) society decided to say cover up your sexual stimulants.
From a personal perspective (And it is sexual) I prefer them to be covered up b/c I'd rather have that mystery and be able to unveil it. Whether most men agree, I don't know. That's just me personally though, and if it were up to me, I would keep it the way it is, strictly b/c of that whether it's selfish or not. 
Is this an agreed upon scientific fact when you state that women have more prime external sexual simulators? There are many men that find women breasts unappealing furthermore, should we legislate based on what turns men on? I don't know about Europeans because every beach I've been to in women walked around topless you wouldn't believe it children were in the area, businesses still functioned, and there was still order in society. I think it also says a lot that it's perfectly normal for a guy to stay holed up in his room looking at all kinds of porn but if his wife or girlfriend takes her top off anywhere other then the privacy of her home then it's breaking social order.
Look I'm not advocating that people men or women be allowed to get half naked anywhere but rather it should be equal across the board. If a woman can't go topless at a Giants Football game (though I wouldn't advise that ever) then neither should a man or if a woman wants to go topless in Central Park she should be allowed to.
I think women should be allowed to walk around topless, if I can walk around with my stiffy whipped out
Sexually, our society is repressed. You let the boobies free, people just won't know what to do. Ever been to South of France? You can tell who the Americans are based upon whose jaws drop to the sand. We may not be a Christian society, but ours is based upon Puritan values nonetheless
women should only be allowed topless in public if they have nice ones to look at... otherwise, please leave those nazty saggy teets under wraps.
Posted by TMS:
women should only be allowed topless in public if they have nice ones to look at... otherwise, please leave those nazty saggy teets under wraps.
Well when every man had a body like Brad Pitt then they can their shirts off. Oh wait that would eliminate about 75% of the male population over the age 25.
i am a "boobman" by fault. if a girl has nice boobs, i have a bad habit of staring. with that said, i am going to say no to public exhibition of boobs. i can't function, simple as that. i would just stare. maybe on certain situations like the beach, possibly. but the fact that it is a hot day and walk around the neighborhood topless because it is hot, no way.
I see to many potential car accidents. There also could be a run on neck injuries that insurance may not cover. If they could limit it to B cup or smaller--I think they could have something going however.
Posted by Allanfan20:
Decency is the eye of the beholder. However, if you took away the fact that breasts are a part of a womans body used to stimulate sexuality, then I'd say it's fine to let them be exposed. However, the fact in the matter is that they ARE a sexual stimulate. It turns on most men just to look at them and it turns on women to have them touched (By the right guy of course) and it turns some women on if guys are just looking at them.
Therefore, it's best to keep things the way they are.
Nothing sinful about breasts though. I don't know why so many religious extremists say they are. It turns people on, but getting turned on does not equate to pre maritial sex!!!
My whole body is a sexual stimulant. Should I be covered up?
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Decency is the eye of the beholder. However, if you took away the fact that breasts are a part of a womans body used to stimulate sexuality, then I'd say it's fine to let them be exposed. However, the fact in the matter is that they ARE a sexual stimulate. It turns on most men just to look at them and it turns on women to have them touched (By the right guy of course) and it turns some women on if guys are just looking at them.
Therefore, it's best to keep things the way they are.
Nothing sinful about breasts though. I don't know why so many religious extremists say they are. It turns people on, but getting turned on does not equate to pre maritial sex!!!
My whole body is a sexual stimulant. Should I be covered up?
yes you should be as covered up as possible.
Posted by Marv:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Allanfan20:
Decency is the eye of the beholder. However, if you took away the fact that breasts are a part of a womans body used to stimulate sexuality, then I'd say it's fine to let them be exposed. However, the fact in the matter is that they ARE a sexual stimulate. It turns on most men just to look at them and it turns on women to have them touched (By the right guy of course) and it turns some women on if guys are just looking at them.
Therefore, it's best to keep things the way they are.
Nothing sinful about breasts though. I don't know why so many religious extremists say they are. It turns people on, but getting turned on does not equate to pre maritial sex!!!
My whole body is a sexual stimulant. Should I be covered up?
yes you should be as covered up as possible.
Dude, that's send closk
Posted by BRIGGS:
I see to many potential car accidents. There also could be a run on neck injuries that insurance may not cover. If they could limit it to B cup or smaller--I think they could have something going however.
kid you not, briggs, that would be me if it was allowed. have so many car accidents that it wouldnt be funny.
