Off Topic · Proof the Bombs not planes took down WTC (page 10)

The white plane was a WAC. It has a large flat disc on it. This is for transmitting strong radio signals. This is how the U.S Army guided the radio controlled 767's to crash into the WTC's. They also controlled the Global Hawk that slammed into the pentagon lawn from these planes.

Professional Liar ^

What is the job of a WAC?

what happens when you deplane from a WAC?

Whhen a WAC is off course, what is that called?

playa2 wrote:Americans have been "programmed" for the three "S's" Sex, Screen and Sport.

The white plane was a WAC. It has a large flat disc on it. This is for transmitting strong radio signals. This is how the U.S Army guided the radio controlled 767's to crash into the WTC's. They also controlled the Global Hawk that slammed into the pentagon lawn from these planes.

Holographic projection involves projection of a three-dimensional holographic image in project decoys, above the battlefield.

Witnesses DID see “SOMETHING” on 9/11. Likely either the DECOY planes… or perhaps JASSM Cruise missiles? The AGM-158 JASSM Cruise Missile The JASSM is a conventionally armed, low observable cruise missile designed to destroy the enemy’s high-value targets from aircraft that can be launched from outside the area defenses. The missile has automatic target recognition, autonomous guidance, precision accuracy, and a J-1000 warhead optimized for penetration and carrying a new high-yield explosive. These characteristics give JASSM capabilities against heavily defended hard targets such as aircraft shelters and underground command posts, as well as soft targets such as rail yards. www.globalsecurity.org Another possible answer is Uranium tipped missile, launched by a weaponized UAV, like the Global Hawk.

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:Playa,

If its for "oil" then which companies stand to profit? There are hundereds of Oil companies?

This is the elite calling you and giving you the why...."CONTROL"

This is the inside stuff ^

This is the inside stuff ^

YOu tube is "inside"?

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer German philosopher, 1788-1860
playa2

Arthur "Art Schop" Shopenhaur

"Boredom is just the reverse side of fascination: both depend on being outside rather than inside a situation, and one leads to the other."
Arthur Schopenhauer

"This is inside stuff"
Playa

Military guys like myself have something like spidey senses when it comes to stuff like this. Many cilvilians are afraid to believe it's true because it means they and their children have no hope. GET IT

playa2 wrote:Nalod you went from a kid tugging on moms dress for the new vanilla coco puffs , to some ex prostitute who's husband can't satisfy her. Sheesh !

Military guys like myself have something like spidey senses when it comes to stuff like this. Many cilvilians are afraid to believe it's true because it means they and their children have no hope. GET IT

Do you bowl on the sabbath?

The Govt put up some holograph like the one they used in forest gump to make us think a plane flew into the pentagon.

Now, whose really coo coo for CoCo Puffs?

Nalod wrote:They got Vanilla Coco Puffs? Can you call them "Coco Puffs"?

The Govt put up some holograph like the one they used in forest gump to make us think a plane flew into the pentagon.

Now, whose really coo coo for CoCo Puffs?

Class is in session Debunk Nalod pt 2

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nat...

Pentagon planners started to discuss digital morphing after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Covert operators kicked around the idea of creating a computer-faked videotape of Saddam Hussein crying or showing other such manly weaknesses, or in some sexually compromising situation. The nascent plan was for the tapes to be flooded into Iraq and the Arab world.

The tape war never proceeded, killed, participants say, by bureaucratic fights over jurisdiction, skepticism over the technology, and concerns raised by Arab coalition partners.

What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad?
But the "strategic" PSYOPS scheming didn't die. What if the U.S. projected a holographic image of Allah floating over Baghdad urging the Iraqi people and Army to rise up against Saddam, a senior Air Force officer asked in 1990?

According to a military physicist given the task of looking into the hologram idea, the feasibility had been established of projecting large, three-dimensional objects that appeared to float in the air.

But doing so over the skies of Iraq? To project such a hologram over Baghdad on the order of several hundred feet, they calculated, would take a mirror more than a mile square in space, as well as huge projectors and power sources.

And besides, investigators came back, what does Allah look like?

The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that washingtonpost.com has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS application. The "Holographic Projector" is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to "project information power from space ... for special operations deception missions."

War is Like a Box of Chocolates
Voice-morphing? Fake video? Holographic projection? They sound more like Mission Impossible and Star Trek gimmicks than weapons. Yet for each, there are corresponding and growing research efforts as the technologies improve and offensive information warfare expands.

Whereas early voice morphing required cutting and pasting speech to put letters or words together to make a composite, Papcun's software developed at Los Alamos can far more accurately replicate the way one actually speaks. Eliminated are the robotic intonations.

The irony is that after Papcun finished his speech cloning research, there were no takers in the military. Luckily for him, Hollywood is interested: The promise of creating a virtual Clark Gable is mightier than the sword.

Video and photo manipulation has already raised profound questions of authenticity for the journalistic world. With audio joining the mix, it is not only journalists but also privacy advocates and the conspiracy-minded who will no doubt ponder the worrisome mischief that lurks in the not too distant future.

"We already know that seeing isn't necessarily believing," says Dan Kuehl, "now I guess hearing isn't either."

William M. Arkin, author of "The U.S. Military Online," is a leading expert on national security and the Internet. He lectures and writes on nuclear weapons, military matters and information warfare. An Army intelligence analyst from 1974-1978.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Like I have told naysayers before, Govt military technology is usually 15-20 yrs ahead from public knowledge of what they have already invented. The fake planes and people allegedly talking to their love ones on the flight 93 etc.. can be easily done by these brilliant experts.

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

You keep putting up "evidence" that the Government was involved. But those hours and hours of material hardley if at all touches on motive.

"World order" and "greedy oil" is very abstract in nature.

Thes acusations are very serious but they lack the motivation for the final result.

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

You keep putting up "evidence" that the Government was involved. But those hours and hours of material hardley if at all touches on motive.

"World order" and "greedy oil" is very abstract in nature.

Thes acusations are very serious but they lack the motivation for the final result.

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

You keep putting up "evidence" that the Government was involved. But those hours and hours of material hardley if at all touches on motive.

"World order" and "greedy oil" is very abstract in nature.

Thes acusations are very serious but they lack the motivation for the final result.

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?

SO YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING, YET YOU HAVE "EVIDENCE". ALSO, TYPING IN CAPS FOR NO REASON IS ANNOYING, DON'T YOU THINK?

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

You keep putting up "evidence" that the Government was involved. But those hours and hours of material hardley if at all touches on motive.

"World order" and "greedy oil" is very abstract in nature.

Thes acusations are very serious but they lack the motivation for the final result.

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?

Playa,

in simple terms, you can just say "I don't know the answer".

That I can respect. A smart man knows what he does not know.

You really don't have to carry the burdan of proving the conspiracy. so much information is in the public for viewing. If you believe it thats cool.

I have long contended its very plausable but before I could ever become emotionally involved I need not just proof, but a deeper understanding of why. IN fact, one could make a moral arguement if losing a building and 3000 lives helped to save 50,000 people it might be a worthy sacrifice. I can't make that arguement because we don't know "WHY". A crime as you and others who believe in might have been commited but crimes have motives.

If those who commited it believe a pre-emptive strike this would be tough to justify with evidence. A pre-emptive strike is not tangable. LIke dropping the bomb on Japan might have prevented further causualties, its open to debate.

Playa: Look at the evidence presented, do you believe?:

Nalod: Lots of information, its plausable! WHy they do it?

Playa: I don't know.

Nalod: Me neither.

Playa: Go knicks!

Nalod: Right on!

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:What became of the passangers?

What became of them is the same fate as the ones in the World Trade Ctrs, it's called MURDER! Evil men don't care who's randomly sacrificed for their greater cause.

So much written about the act, but not the "Greater Cause".

Ok, 10 years since. What then? What now? What about the "Cause"?

Riddle me this Nalod, what will your knowledge of the "Greater Cause" do to change how you view the events that occurred on 911 ?

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?? Why do you continue to ask me ?

You keep putting up "evidence" that the Government was involved. But those hours and hours of material hardley if at all touches on motive.

"World order" and "greedy oil" is very abstract in nature.

Thes acusations are very serious but they lack the motivation for the final result.

WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO TALK TO THE PARTIES INVOLVED TO GET THE ANSWER?

Playa,

in simple terms, you can just say "I don't know the answer".

That I can respect. A smart man knows what he does not know.

You really don't have to carry the burdan of proving the conspiracy. so much information is in the public for viewing. If you believe it thats cool.

I have long contended its very plausable but before I could ever become emotionally involved I need not just proof, but a deeper understanding of why. IN fact, one could make a moral arguement if losing a building and 3000 lives helped to save 50,000 people it might be a worthy sacrifice. I can't make that arguement because we don't know "WHY". A crime as you and others who believe in might have been commited but crimes have motives.

If those who commited it believe a pre-emptive strike this would be tough to justify with evidence. A pre-emptive strike is not tangable. LIke dropping the bomb on Japan might have prevented further causualties, its open to debate.

Playa: Look at the evidence presented, do you believe?:

Nalod: Lots of information, its plausable! WHy they do it?

Playa: I don't know.

Nalod: Me neither.

Playa: Go knicks!

Nalod: Right on!

So what you are trying to convince me of is if we don't know why JFK GOT SHOT 2 TO 3 TIMES IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, then it's not worth discussion huh?

If we don't know why MLK got shot in daylight on his hotel room balcony then lets just not keep discussing it right.

When did we have to know WHY serial killers kill people to discuss if they did it or not.

You keep saying 911 that it's plausible, so why would you say that when the Govt of the United States said that that guys like Mohamed Atta al Sayed (Egyptian), Waleed al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian), Wail al-Shehri (Saudi Arabian), Abdulaziz al-Omari (Saudi Arabian), Satam al-Suqami (Saudi Arabian) were guilty.

Can you tell me why they supposedly did it, because you among millions say you believe they did it.