Knicks · Mobley suing Knicks (page 1)

BasketballJones @ 11/16/2011 7:12 PM
And in other legal news...

Former NBA guard Cuttino Mobley sued the Knicks Wednesday in federal court, claiming the team "saved millions" by sending him to a doctor "they knew would disqualify him from playing" due to a heart condition soon after trading for him in 2008.

Mobley claims the Knicks pulled that stunt to save money in payments toward the NBA's "luxury tax" for teams with high payrolls, and also to clear "room under the salary cap in their request to retain the services of other [marquee] players."

"Mobley's career was effectively ended," says the disability discrimination suit in Manhattan federal court filed by the retired journeyman guard, who before being signed by the Knicks in 2008 had played for the Los Angeles Clippers, leading them to within a game of the Western Conference Finals in 2006.He also played for the Houston Rockets, Orlando Magic and Sacramento Kings.

The Knicks strongly denied the claims.

Mobley's lawsuit claims that he was first diagnosed in 1999 with a condition called hypertrophic cardiomyopathy -- a thickening of the heart wall -- and that he was thereafter "medically cleared every year, by every NBA team he played for, subject only to his signing a waiver of liability, until his arrival at the Knicks." The suit said "the Knicks were aware of his HCM condition when they agreed to take over his contract."

But, the suit said as a means to save about $19 million in league luxury tax payments and in insurance coverage for his inability to play, the Knicks selected two cardiologists to evaluate him, who were "both well-known opponents of allowing players with HCM to play."

Those doctors then "opined that Mobley should not play," the suit said.

"Mobley was forced and pressured by the Knicks to announce his retirement" in December 2008 -- without every playing a second for the squad -- the suit said.

The Knicks, in a statement, strongly denied the allegations that they purposely engineered Mobley's disqualification from playing as a means to save $19 million in related luxury tax and and salary costs. And the contention in the suit that Mobley's retirement helped them get under the salary cap to sign players is flawed. Mobley's contract expired after the 2008-2009 season and the Knicks were attempting to get under the cap to sign players by the summer of 2010. Mobley's retirement was irrelevant to that strategy.

“Although we understand Cuttino Mobley's frustration with the effects of his illness, we are extremely disappointed in his recent actions," a Knicks spokesman said.

"When the Knicks obtained Cuttino in November of 2008, the team fully expected him to be our starting shooting guard. It was a significant set-back to our team when we learned he would not be able to play following initial reports from his physical. The team and Cuttino agreed he would then see top experts, including doctors at Tufts Medical Center in Boston and additional experts, for various opinions."

"On the day of his retirement, Cuttino publicly stated that he had no choice but to follow the advice of the doctors and step away from the league. We are confident Cuttino’s claims have no merit and will not prevail," the spokesman said.

A source close to the team backed that account, saying team then-Knicks president Donnie Walsh was "devastated" by Mobley's retirement.

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/knicks/former_nba_guard_mobley_suing_knicks_NHiJ9VemaHy93iA17ssGcM#ixzz1duu79wIT

Waiting for commentary from eVil....

This is going to be a very educational year regarding our legal system.

eViL @ 11/16/2011 7:20 PM
haha... from basketball courts to civil courts. not a fair trade in my view.

i have a hard time seeing Mobley winning this if it went all the way. perhaps he's fishing for a nuisance settlement. not sure what this will get him.

martin @ 11/16/2011 7:23 PM
shouldn't the dude feel lucky he got his money and didn't keel over?
knicks1248 @ 11/16/2011 7:33 PM
wierd..
nykshaknbake @ 11/16/2011 8:57 PM
ridiculous. I guess it's time to sue the NBA teams while they still exist.
Nalod @ 11/16/2011 9:53 PM
Why didn't he contest it at the time if he wanted to play? He took the money instead?

Didn't his contract still count for cap purpose?

MarburyAnd1Crossover @ 11/16/2011 10:14 PM
I don't understand. No one can make you retire if you still want to play.
Moonangie @ 11/16/2011 10:28 PM
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy could have caused him to die if he kept playing in the NBA. They did him a favor. And he still got paid. Must be his agent told him to do this. I'm not all that familiar with him as a player. How good was he actually?
tkf @ 11/17/2011 1:25 AM
mobley out of cash= time to sue knicks..
SupremeCommander @ 11/17/2011 1:48 AM
so this implies that the doctors failed to meet the AMA's eithical standards... wouldn't that have to be proven first in order to win this case? So, yeah, he's probably out of cash and praying the Knicks settle
tkf @ 11/17/2011 2:30 AM
Moonangie wrote:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy could have caused him to die if he kept playing in the NBA. They did him a favor. And he still got paid. Must be his agent told him to do this. I'm not all that familiar with him as a player. How good was he actually?

PRETTY good actually, I thought he could really help us... A healthy mobley would help this current team out a lot.....

Nalod @ 11/17/2011 7:48 AM
Mables gonna sue Knicks for "alienation of affection"?

Eddy gonna sue knicks for "intentional inflated caloric exposure"?

Jerome "Deceptive Hybernative Metabolic Abuse"?

eViL @ 11/17/2011 8:39 AM
Nalod wrote:Mables gonna sue Knicks for "alienation of affection"?

Eddy gonna sue knicks for "intentional inflated caloric exposure"?

Jerome "Deceptive Hybernative Metabolic Abuse"?

i wonder if Mobley is going to use the Knicks allowing Curry to play as part of his argument. they didn't have the same condition did they? what doctors did they send eddy too?

Bonn1997 @ 11/17/2011 10:32 AM
martin wrote:shouldn't the dude feel lucky he got his money and didn't keel over?

There isn't much detail in the article. Are you sure he got his full salary? If so, then the lawsuit seems entirely baseless.
Nalod @ 11/17/2011 10:35 AM
eViL wrote:
Nalod wrote:Mables gonna sue Knicks for "alienation of affection"?

Eddy gonna sue knicks for "intentional inflated caloric exposure"?

Jerome "Deceptive Hybernative Metabolic Abuse"?

i wonder if Mobley is going to use the Knicks allowing Curry to play as part of his argument. they didn't have the same condition did they? what doctors did they send eddy too?

ITs a good question. I think Eddy's conditoin was related to ephedra intake and perhsps they found a few docters who signed off on that. As long as Eddy was not taking it perhaps his condition was arrested.

We see he had weight problems and his legs could not support the weight.

Mobley situaton is a bit different. I don't know if the knicks are really guilty as charged but Mobley got paid every cent of his huge contract and was put on waivers. Could he have been claimed by another team at that point?

Nalod @ 11/17/2011 10:47 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
martin wrote:shouldn't the dude feel lucky he got his money and didn't keel over?

There isn't much detail in the article. Are you sure he got his full salary? If so, then the lawsuit seems entirely baseless.

I would have thought the time to fight this would have been when he was denied, not 3 years past. I thought also he was to attempt a comeback last year?

Lawyers can be very convincing to motivate folks into a suit. Even if they can settle for a small amount they get to make a name for themselves and build their reputation.

As I recall, Mobley was not happy with not playing but knicks paid him.

Bonn1997 @ 11/17/2011 6:26 PM
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
martin wrote:shouldn't the dude feel lucky he got his money and didn't keel over?

There isn't much detail in the article. Are you sure he got his full salary? If so, then the lawsuit seems entirely baseless.

I would have thought the time to fight this would have been when he was denied, not 3 years past. I thought also he was to attempt a comeback last year?

Lawyers can be very convincing to motivate folks into a suit. Even if they can settle for a small amount they get to make a name for themselves and build their reputation.

As I recall, Mobley was not happy with not playing but knicks paid him.


I agree that the time to fight it was 3 years ago and it doesn't make sense now.
Page 1 of 1